Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Revolution 1.12 "Ghosts" Review: Haunting Memories


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Revolution 1.12 "Ghosts" Review: Haunting Memories

2 Apr 2013

Share on Reddit
     This week’s solid episode of Revolution, “Ghosts,” was written by the team of David Rambo and Melissa Glenn who also wrote a solid episode in “Ties that Bind.” Once again, the story deals with family. Most of the characters are dealing with a loss and fragmentation of their family. The episode was directed by Miguel Sapochnik whose credits include another JJ Abrams’ show: Fringe. Sapochnik’s use of tight focus and light and shadow in the first scene between Monroe (David Lyons) and Flynn (Colm Feore) is particularly effective in being evocative of the cat and mouse game the characters are playing as they vie for dominance in their relationship. There is also a beautiful transition between a slow motion shot of Flynn walking in the present to a regular speed shot of him walking in the past.
     All the characters are still reeling from Danny’s (Graham Rogers) death, and Rachel (Elizabeth Mitchell), Charlie (Tracy Spiridakos), and Miles (Billy Burke) each deal with his death in their own destructive way. While many viewers felt cheated that the entire first half of the season was about saving Danny only to kill him, his death is an important catalyst going forward. It also is in keeping with a precedent that Kripke began in Supernatural when the entire first season was about finding John only to have him die in the season two premiere. It’s also a device used by Abrams in Lost when Boone survives the plane crash only to be killed relatively shortly thereafter.
    Danny’s death, perhaps most importantly, really causes Miles to commit to helping the rebels and he embarks on a mission to gather all his own former senior officers, starting with Jim Hudson (Malik Yoba). Going forward, this supplies us with at least a few episodes that will revolve around the quest to build Miles’ special force and has the potential to supply us with a number of interesting characters going forward. When Nora (Daniella Alonso) tries to reach out to him about Danny’s death, he tells her, “I’m fighting for your stupid rebels, what more do you want from me?” He’s committed to getting revenge for Danny’s death as opposed to the rebels themselves.
    Hudson, for his part, wants no part of Miles or their old life. He’s moved on, gotten married and wants to build a better life – as the librarian of a small idyllic community. Miles tells Hudson, “You can’t run from who you are. You cannot wash that much blood of your hands. Sooner or later it’s going to catch up with you.” Miles is, of course, talking about himself and he obviously feels that the blood of both Ben and Danny rests squarely on his shoulders. He tells Hudson, that guys like them can’t have a family because “if you care about somebody, you’re just going to let them down. Or worse, get them killed.” He tells him “We are killers. That’s all we are.” This is what Miles has become – or at least what he thinks he’s become. In the end, Hudson seems to demonstrate this when he kills his wife’s attacker. I did find myself thinking that in this very brutal world, it seems unlikely that she’s never been faced with violence or that on some level at the very least, she would appreciate being saved from certain death. In the end, Hudson’s love is not enough for her, of course, as the plot demands. Hudson going with Miles only reinforces Miles own belief that he is bad news to all those around him. It may be interesting going forward to see if Hudson is actually going to remain loyal to Miles.
    Both Charlie and Rachel bury themselves in their work. Rachel tries to reach out to Charlie, but when she tries to comfort Charlie at Danny’s burial, Charlie pulls her hand away and refuses all of Rachel’s attempts at mothering her. I thought she was right in accusing Rachel of too little too late in the mothering department. Rachel wasn’t around to raise her children after all, regardless of the reason. Rachel is still keeping a number of secrets, and I still wonder how those secrets may have factored into the course of events. However, Danny’s death has clearly made her realize that she needs to fight, and she destroys the pendants so that Flynn can’t get them and so that no more kids die. Charlie’s coldness helps Rachel to realize just how badly she has let her kids down, especially how much she put on Charlie’s shoulders.
    We see that Flynn’s motives aren’t that much different from Rachel’s. The flashbacks show Flynn and his wife receiving notification that their son has been killed in active duty in Afghanistan. He is clearly motivated by this to design some kind of weapon at the Department of Defense – and we learn that not only Rachel worked for him there but also Ben. Flynn’s motivation seems to be for good, to “stop the bloodshed” so more soldiers won’t die.
    Whatever it is that they’ve designed it is housed in the mysterious “Tower.” I keep thinking of the tarot card “The Tower” every time they mention it. The meaning of the card in its upright position is disaster, upheaval, change and revelation. It’s not necessarily a bad card, but represents the positive changes that can result from a sudden upheaval – creation that can come out of destruction. Flynn tells Rachel that he doesn’t want to turn the power back on. “The blackout wiped the world clean. Burnt it down. When you burn down the old, new things grow. We can make a better world, Rachel. A safer one.” This completely reflects the tarot card. Flynn’s heart may be in the right place, even if his methods are suspect.
    I’m also not convinced that the tower is actually a tower in the way we think. The final flashback talks about “executing” a “virus” – both computer terms. We came very close, I think, to the moment the power actually went out. I wonder if Ben hid some kind of failsafe in the machine/weapon they built for Flynn so that when it was activated it actually killed the power so it couldn’t be used or whether Flynn’s plan was to turn the power off, and the failsafe is how to turn it back on. I thought it was an interesting twist that Flynn is fixated on putting his dream team together again. I also wonder if he knew that Aaron Pittman (Zak Orth), computer genius, was with them, if Flynn wouldn’t want him even more. I’m really looking forward to seeing Aaron get to strut his smarts going forward. We get more clarification that Rachel was the one who first took Aaron in. Rachel promises to tell Aaron everything, including about the Tower. If anyone can help to fix a computer virus, I’m betting it’s Aaron.
    Giancarlo Esposito (Neville) only has one small scene in this episode, and he is magnificent in it. He goes to Monroe because he’s heard about the mission to retrieve Rachel. As he asks Monroe why he’s not on it, Esposito’s voice quavers. Monroe has just asked how Neville and his wife are, considering their son’s passing. Neville’s voice quavering may be because he is nervous that Monroe has found out that Jason isn’t dead or it could be that Neville is simply concerned that Monroe is replacing him with Flynn. Monroe’s answer isn’t designed to set Neville’s mind at rest on either point, as he says that he doesn’t trust Flynn, but doesn’t trust anyone else either – implying that he also doesn’t trust Neville. Again, this could be a reference to Jason or simply letting Neville play a bigger role. Esposito continues to create a fascinatingly nuanced character with layers of insecurity coupled with ambition, troubled by his love for his family.
    While the two parallel fight scenes were exciting enough, there weren’t enough long shots to make the skirmish with Miles, Nora, and Hudson really coherent. Once again, the characters with guns either don’t shoot or are ridiculously bad shots. This week’s pet peeve is about Nora and Rachel’s leather jackets. Fifteen years after the blackout, where are they getting these lovely new leather jackets? The leather is not worn at all.
    Overall, this was a really solid episode. Family remains a consistent theme going forward that motivates all the characters for good or ill. All of the characters are haunted in some way by the “Ghosts” of their past. I’m pleased that they aren’t going to drag out the tension between Charlie and Rachel, but that Miles is still grappling with his own inner demons. Colm Feore is proving to be an intriguing adversary. What did you think of the episode? Let me know in the comments below.

12 comments:

  1. This was an alright episode, but I guess I had more problems with it. The fight stuff really bugged me. Really? you're going to fire a maching gun into a tight cluster of people that includes your mother? Well, I guess that, if so, it's a good thing you can't hit anything.
    I quite like Colm Feore and agree that he's doing a good job of playing Randall, but I didn't find the flashbacks particularly edifying this time out. They were so brief that they do little other than establish that his big bad status all traces back to the death of his son, which seems just way too simplistic for me--at least, without anything more in terms of characterization. Given his government position in the DoD, you'd think he'd have more equinamity than that. Of course, it does tie into the show's almost obsessive focus on family dynamics as at the root of everything.
    Tower/tarot eh? Interesting speculation. Clearly, computer viruses (computer tower!) are an issue here. I don't think Randall deliberately shut down the world's power, though; we're told that things haven't been tested enough but he goes ahead anyway. I think that this was supposed to be a controlled shutdown in ... wherever it was, Afghanistan? that cascaded and took out everything.
    Randall and Miles both setting out to rebuild old teams does provide some episode fodder, but I hope we don't spend too long tracking down these game pieces--one of the most frustrating thing about the final Fringe season was all that time spent tracking down video tapes and objects in a massibe plot coupon hunt, rather than in forward movement, so I hope we don't see that particular Abrams tic worked out too excessively here.
    Good review, though!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice touch with the Tarot Card!!!!!!!!!. I keep thinking about The Dark Tower (Stephen King), but had not thought of Tarot cards, which is so appropriate when you think both about their Medieval/Renascence origins (and reproduction today often still in Medieval styles) and that Revolution and the Dark Tower are about "fated" groups people!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Agree with your post. Yes, the reasons are too simplistic. Not this time but also the reason Rachel agreed to do such a damaging project just for the sake of saving Danny. I felt the reason is not very compelling there too, especially considering the fact, there are a lot of ways she can do it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good and refreshing review as usual, Lisa.
    Well, this show is no Supernatural when it comes to family and emotions, but it is doing a better job now than the pre-hiatus episodes, regarding the family drama.
    Also, am I the only one, who felt the way Randall walked along with the soldiers in the rebellion camp is like a scene from Star Wars where Darth Vader marches along with his army?
    Action scenes especially with swords are really entertaining. I am glad half the episode is filled with of well-choreographed action and I hope it remains the same for future episodes. I am eagerly waiting for a war between two or more republics in the USA now. Also, I want Neville to rebel against Monroe soon. Rest of the season looks promising.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think family/the costs of family is pretty central. The first major arc focused on getting a brother back. Now that he's dead, we have a dead son/brother/nephew fueling the desire for vengeance of the major characters. We have in that same episode where Danny died Neville telling his own son that he's dead to him--a literal and metaphorical death of a child in the same episode. In THIS episode, the death of Randall's son is really harped on as his defining trait (he's holding the kid's dog tags when he gives the blackout order, for Pete's sake!). So that's three literally or metaphoricallydead sons attached to five major characters.

    (Speaking of Stephen King, what about The Stand? The big bad there was Randall Flagg, to which Randall Flynn is pretty close.)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks! I think part of the difference in treating family in Revolution vs Supernatural is that there are more different family dynamics. Just having a bigger cast, we don't get as much screen time with them, so I think it's taking longer to warm up to them. I really hope they don't get the power back too soon because we might lose all the sword-fighting! Neville is quickly becoming one of the most interesting characters to me...

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think in the end, though, Miles is willing to do whatever it takes for his own family - regardless to the cost of others. And I think that might be the point. Also, soldiers are frequently referred to as "brothers in arms" and I think that adds another interesting dimension. Monroe insisted that he and Miles were like brothers, but Miles rejected him in favor of his biological family. That killing distances Jim and Miles from their loved ones is, I think, part of the point. I don't think we are supposed to take away that maintaining a family unit is easy, but that it is something worth fighting for... I hope that makes sense...

    ReplyDelete
  8. OMG - can't believe I didn't see the parallel team building! Even though I mentioned both! *facepalm* I think that tracking down these puzzle pieces can be a lot more interesting than the way it was done on Fringe. I love the speculation that the shut down just ended up running away from them... great theory!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I wasn't saying that the show isn't about family, but rather it expounds and challenges the traditional definition of what that may be.

    Like Lisa had stated in response to me, there are all of these "groups" like "brothers in arms" We all live in act with people in groups within groups within groups and thus family becomes a word associated to loyalty to a group one lives daily life with.


    If Charlie would be Mile's daughter, for instance, it challenges it again by betrayal to Ben.
    Or what about Nora and Sister, the choice to stick with Miles?



    This things then also pertain to anti-family (ex: moving away from one group in support of another) and/or the sociopolitical behaviors we humans have to be apart of "something" greater than ourselves.


    I agree with Lisa that ultimately the show is mostly about Miles redemption of his betrayals and families lives he has destroyed including his own immediate biological family, by finding salvation from them, but I think the road is long and winding and not a straight one.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Y'know, maybe Charlie IS Miles's daughter--there certainly seems to have been something between Miles and Rachel at some point. Hope not, though.
    I haven't read The Stand since it came out, so the Randall thing is the only one I noted, and I didn't even consider that one until you mentioned King in your earlier post! If it's been discussed before, I missed/forgot about it

    ReplyDelete
  11. "I don't think we are supposed to take away that maintaining a family unit is easy, but that it is something worth fighting for... I hope that makes sense..."

    I generally agree, but by Sophie leaving Jim, opens up that debate, because it's setting precedent that it's not just about maintaining a family unit, but that also not all families (people one might think they want to be in a family with) are worth maintaining/fighting for! So it's also about being with 'the right people'/ finding where you belong.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I agree that it is about being with the people who return the sentiment and are willing to see past your flaws etc to still love you enough to do whatever it takes to maintain that unit. Family isn't just about blood or even sex. I think it would be easy to be too hard on Sophie though. My knee-jerk reaction was she isn't worth it, but on the other hand, we really know nothing of her backstory and she _was_ completely lied to. That said, what Jim was when with her should count for something. Who knows, maybe we'll see her have a change of heart in the future...

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.