Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Stitchers - A Stitch In Time - Review: "Saves Two and More"


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Stitchers - A Stitch In Time - Review: "Saves Two and More"

3 Jun 2015

Share on Reddit


Pilots are a unique animal. They have a very difficult job to do. They're suppose to introduce the regular characters, build the world and then demonstrate what the viewer can expect from each episode. This pilot was successful at world building. I had some fun with the crime solving part of the episode as well. However, the main characters were a problem for me. I began the episode really disliking the main character. I think that might be a problem for a casual viewer who's not interested enough in the premise to stick the episode out. Then again, this is ABCFamily and I'm not the target demographic. I'm told the target demographic has a chronically short attention span so, if the characters don't grab these viewers it could cost ratings. Because this is a pilot I'm going to spend most of my time reviewing the show setup.

The episode starts in the middle of a “Stitch”. It’s kind of freaky and we don’t really know what’s going on or what the rules are. But color me definitely returning after the opening credits.

Then we meet our main character Kirsten Clark (Emma Ishta). Kirsten's roommate Camille (Allison Scagliotti) are meeting with the head of the computer department. Camille accuses Kirsten of sabotaging her research and wants her put on academic suspension. Kirsten obviously doesn't care enough to be bothered. My problem is, Camille's reasoning makes no sense, she has zero evidence and once the discussion descends into an argument about doing the dishes it's obvious the Dean of the Department is being subjected to a childish temper tantrum that he *should* ignore, but instead, he does put Kirsten on academic suspension. My basic reaction was extreme dislike of both female characters. We do learn that Kirsten has a condition called "Temporal Dysplasia." More on that in a moment.

Much more interesting is watching Kirsten having to identify the body of her father. She’s completely unaffected. When the police inform her that he committed suicide she declares that he was murdered. The police are absolutely certain of their conclusion and dismiss her. Suddenly this woman who showed NO feeling at all while standing over her father’s dead body stops at nothing to find out what happened to him. Suddenly I’m getting the feeling that there might be a person here that I would like spending an hour a week with.

Kirsten discovers that, due to the academic suspension, she can no longer log into the university's computer system. (I'm guessing this is the main reason the roommate argument wasn't cut from the episode.) So she heads out of the house to break into the department head's office. As she crosses the street a black SUV follows her.

After an example of why a simple 3 digit pass code is inadequate against anyone who took high school statistics, Kirsten finds her first clue. I'm sure we'll be seeing this again. Hopefully, we won't have to wait until episodes late in the order. A moment later a SWAT-ish team swoops in and puts a black bag over her head.

When the bag is removed we find ourselves in the first exposition scene. And it's pretty good. It’s difficult to lay out these kinds of details in a scene where one person has to explain it all to another. Not only did the scene work well for me but I started to warm up to Kirsten. I think Salli Richardson-Whitfield and Emma Ishta have good on screen chemistry.
Kirsten explains to her soon to be new boss Maggie Baptiste, how temporal dysplasia works. She doesn’t know what feels like for time to pass. For those times she can’t just look at a clock she has to for, example, perform complicated calculations to figure out how much time she’s spent doing something. Of her father's death she says “The reason I didn’t react when I saw Ed dead at the morgue is because the moment I saw him, it was as if he’d been dead forever."

Once this explanation is finished Maggie offers Kirsten a job. Kirsten seems interested more because she realizes that her odds of finding a job, given her personality issues, are slim. So she decides to check it out.

The Stitchers Program secret base is beneath a Chinese restaurant. (I couldn’t help the flashback to Special Unit 2.) And we’re getting more series regular introductions. I didn't hate these characters, but I was disappointed by how cliched they were. None of these characters made my list of why I want to watch the show. Not even the male lead, whose name I immediately forgot. Cameron Goodkin (I looked it up.)

We’re also given the next important piece of exposition…filling us in on what the Stitchers Program is and how it will work. Basically, if the program gets a body fast enough they can keep its memory accessible for about 48 hours. During that time they can "Stitch" Kirsten’s consciousness into the dead person’s memory and she can provide clues and information crucial to solving a crime.

But here was the other moment that made my brain scream ‘wait a minute!’ Kirsten goes from “Has anyone ever done this before?” healthy skepticism to “So, what do you want me to do once I’m inside his memories?” in the space of a couple of lines of dialog.

Hang on! She took the job? What? Why? I mean was there a reason other than ‘because it was in the script?’ I completely understand why she checked the project out but I have no clue why she agreed to it. But agree she did. And we’re off.

This is the part where they actually got me on board. I liked the way they used the stitching to solve the case. A bomber was killed in an accidental explosion and a second bomb he built went off killing several people. The cops know he’s planted two other bombs but they don’t know where. This is Kirsten’s first assignment.

Stepping into the memories wasn’t as simple as the team expected it to be.

First, they allow Kirsten to go into this mission with zero preparation. Apparently Marta (the first Stitcher) didn't react like this because the team is completely taken aback by Kirsten's crashing vital signs. They almost abort mission but Kirsten calms and settles into the job.

Second, she touches the bomber's girlfriend and nearly all of the hardware powers down. No one on staff had a clue this could happen. But this action winds up netting them the biggest clue of the case.

Third, Kirsten doesn’t come out of the stitch unscathed. She steps out of the pool, approaches the scientific head of the project, gives him a clue about a Blue Door, kisses him then collapses.

When Kirsten discovers that the government’s official field agents can’t find the Blue Door she declares that field teams are obviously doing it wrong and she could do it better. Maggie informs her that the project is “as clandestine as they come” and if she’s caught working outside the mandate they will all be swooped up and disappeared. Therefore, they will adhere to their mandate and stay in the building. Other groups will do the leg work. Kirsten ignores Maggie completely and heads off to do what she's certain she can do better.

Kirsten winds up back at her house eliciting help from her roommate. (who, happily, is no longer annoying) They piece the clues together that lead them to the other two targets.

The bomber wasn't a terrorist. He was a grief stricken man whose girlfriend was hit by a car when she, upset because her bosses stole her invention and sold it, ran into the street. He destroyed the building where his girlfriend worked, blew himself up intentionally, and planned to kill the two people he felt were responsible for her death.

Using more clues garnered from the Stitch, Kirsten and Cameron stop the final bomb from going off saving two targets and the potential innocents that would have been killed as well. Their thank you is to get their hands slapped by Maggie (because she got her hands slapped for letting them out of the building.) Since Kirsten didn’t want to be there in the first place she walks. I cheered.

Cameron stops her and she explains that she had to learn to read emotions from flash cards of people’s faces when she was a child. The Stitch allowed her to experience emotions she’d never felt before and she finds that she’s not a huge fan of feeling these emotions. Despite that, when she was offered the possibility of solving her father's murder she says she’s in and we have a series.

I thought they did a better job with the story than they did with the character work but they did manage to get me to like Kirsten. She may have some serious problems with interpersonal relationships but I really like her passion for solving these crimes. I hope that the other regular/recurring characters get better treatment once the regular episodes start to roll out. I think this is going to be a fun show.

Agree? Disagree? I'd love to hear your thoughts on the episode.

About the Author - Prpleight
Prpleight is a screenwriter and senior software engineer with solid geek cred. When not writing code, screenplays, or watching TV (sometimes she does all three at the same time), she uses her broadsword Bessie to battle evil. She's been a frequent contributor to the SpoilerTV discussion boards for several years now. Currently, she's reviewing Stitchers and Ash vs. Evil Dead.
Recent Reviews (All Reviews)

15 comments:

  1. Congrats on your first review!


    Welcome to the team!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sorry but i like all the characters EXCEPT Baptiste, there's a twist coming with Kirsten's roommate.

    ReplyDelete
  3. So I just found out that the show's EP and the guy who wrote the pilot used to wrote for one of my favorite sci-fi shows as a kid, Black Hole High. The pilot itself have a lot of promise so I'm hoping it gets some really good ratings right off the bat

    ReplyDelete
  4. Strange Days at Blake Holsey High?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yeah. That one and The Zack Files.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wow i haven't heard about that show in a long time! That show was great, i can't remember but i think it was my first time seeing a time travel show.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I love a LOT of shows that I don't think are perfect. Perfection is rare....especially in television. I went into this review sight unseen. But it does sound like I need to work on my balancing act and make sure to give as much time to the pluses. There were numerous important pluses for me here.


    The largest plus for, me, was that they made me really like a character I had an initial negative reaction to. Character is my number one reason for watching a show. They got me to really like Kirsten and they got me to enjoy this show.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thank you. Fun challenge.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm hoping the ratings are great for the show as well. ABCFamily has done some interesting shows that I wish had gotten more time to gain an audience. I think Stitchers has great potential.

    ReplyDelete
  10. This show wasn't on my possibles before, but now I am intrigued enough to add it to my DVR and give it a trial.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Glad to hear it. I think it is going to be a lot of fun.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Yeah i get that but you made it sound like you had NO pluses and all minuses, i mean i get what you mean about perfection but it made it sound like you didn't like it enough, sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Remember that it's a supernatural/sci-fi show and they don't last on ABC Family, but hopefully this'll be the one that breaks the pattern.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Please don't apologize. Your feed back will help me improve as a reviewer. Thank you for taking the time to give me the feedback.

    ReplyDelete
  15. You're welcome, i always feel bad for giving feedback. I feel like i'm being mean towards someone.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.