This table shows the early overnight ratings. These ratings are normally adjusted later in the day when all the ratings have been consolidated to take into account any local preemptions and/or overruns. You can find all the final adjusted numbers in our Ratings Database. (See the About section below for details about ratings)
Each day (except Sunday) during the main TV Season we post the TV Ratings for the previous nights primetime shows for the major broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, CW, FOX, NBC). Cable Network ratings will be added to the Ratings Database.
The first item that gets posted (normally around 2pm GMT) is the early overnight analysis based on the early household numbers (these are not the same as the Total Viewers and 18-49 Demo numbers that are posted later).
Next, if available, we will post the Top 25 Market 18-49 Ratings to give you a rough idea of the ratings to following.
Later on (normally between 4pm-5pm GMT) we post the official early overnight Total Viewers and 18-49 Demo numbers in the table above (We also where possible now post the 18-34 and 25-54 Demo Numbers).
Finally, later in the evening (10pm-11pm GMT) or the following day, the final adjusted ratings numbers are released, these are then posted in the Ratings Database. The Final Adjusted numbers are what we use for all our Renew/Cancellation Tables, Full Season Tables, Ratings Scorecards etc (see below). Friday's Final Adjusted Ratings are normally available on the following Monday.
If you’re interested in Ratings/Renewals/Cancellations then we have a number of resources here at SpoilerTV that we recommend you check out.
That is Poor for the revenge repeats but repeats don't matter
ReplyDeleteOf course, since you sad the show is heavily serialized then I wouldn't be too worried. Its chances for renewal are the same now as always—persnally I'd give it a 40%-60% chance, and a 20% chance to get a full season. If it keeps a 11-1.2 it could be fine, but if it goes sub-1 the rest of the season then there would be only a slim chance for renewal. You probably know that already though.
ReplyDeleteDoes someone could view the hearings and rate half hour?
ReplyDeleteThey have not been released yet.
ReplyDeleteMost of country started CBS on time (7:30), it was in a few markets like KC, Indy, Nashville, that carried that other game (OAK-DEN), most of ET/CT had the CAR-ATL, which finished on time.
ReplyDeleteCBS had a very decent night. Revenge repeats did terribly but that was to be expected. Its purpose was always to raise awareness, not to have decent ratings.
ReplyDeleteCsI was outstanding last night but it was quite late in the midwest
ReplyDeleteWow nice bound for CSI !
ReplyDeleteYeah a great episode for Jorja Fox !
ReplyDeletenot necessarily, last week CSI was delayed of 40 minutes and it was adjusted up for the final ratings ;)
ReplyDeleteWow good to know!!! Thanks:D
ReplyDeleteSo I guess the total viewers for TM will adjust up again like last week...this 7.91 was confusing me a little...Why is that with a 8.14 and a 8.13???
ReplyDeleteOT- Is anyone having trouble loading this site with Google Chrome? Every time I visit, it freezes up and kicks me out. On my laptop and tablet. I had to go the old unfaithful Internet Explorer to post. I've never had problems with GC before and I don't like not being able to visit STV. I'm spoiled.
ReplyDeleteI've been having some trouble, too. I think it's the FYI advertisement.
ReplyDeleteThank you. I'm still using ie to visit here but it's slow, it just doesn't freeze or kick me off.
ReplyDeleteWell it did a 0.6 (which is quite good) before it's 4th season premiere got a 1.3, and it also did a 0.6 before its 2nd season premiere got a 3.2, so repeats really don't matter too much. But I still wish it had been higher.
ReplyDeleteHave you reported the problem?
ReplyDeleteShould be under the Features Tab in 'Send Feedback' then 'Report a Bug'. Andy will most likely follow up after the New Years break to get it fixed :)
Thank you! I looked for where I could do that but I must not have looked hard enough. Y'all are awesome.
ReplyDelete