Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Gotham - Episode 1.03 - The Balloonman - Advance Preview


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Gotham - Episode 1.03 - The Balloonman - Advance Preview

5 Oct 2014

Share on Reddit


I'll probably be the loudest to say that Gotham's Pilot was not all I thought it'd be. I'd spent months remaining spoiler-free as to maintain excitement, just to be slightly disappointed. It wasn't that it was bad, it was just okay. Thankfully, Episode 2 "Selina Kyle" was actually an improvement for me. On the scale of West to Bale, it was a solid Keaton in Batman Returns. Yet, that is not what we are here for. The question now is, Will episode 3 "The Balloonman" keep momentum set forth in "Selina Kyle"?

Well it does. Gotham is quickly turning into a great ensemble show. It's not being held up by just one performance but several. The odd Couple dynamic between Bullock and Gordon continues to be the best dysfunctional bromance I've seen since Sam and Dean Winchester. The episode title takes it's name after the vigilante in the episode striking back at the corruption in Gotham by tying victims to weather balloons.Yes, this is absurd, but it's also awesome. While the episode takes it's name after the character, it's not solely devoted to it. That's what I found most intriguing, the intricacy of how well the story seems to be plotted that it doesn't rely on the case of the week to keep it going. I love that the writers are not just setting up subplots to be explored later, but that they are casually mining them and giving us payoff little by little. In this sense a lot of what we saw in the pilot comes back around this week and that's what makes this episode solid, the commitment to follow through on setups.


All in all the weakest part of the episode is the Balloonman storyline. Not because it wasn't good, but because there are things that are just simply more fascinating. The case almost felt background to everything else, which wasn't a problem for me. The struggle for the soul of Gotham has so many players and angles that the case of the week should be background. It's just one part of the arc here and while it helps reinstate that there is a battle on the horizon for our characters, it doesn't masquerade itself as the center of it.

Now for the Gripe:
Maybe I'm alone in this, but I'm not sold on Smith's portrayal of Fish. She does nothing for me except grate on my nerves, so I was happy we were spared from another Jim and Harvey's awesome trip to Fish's. Though when we did see some of her this week (much to my dismay) I found myself distracted by the thought of what Disney villain Jada is trying to emulate with that awful accent. (I'm sorry but I'm not sorry) I know she's supposed to be a gangster, and this is a comic-book based show, but I can't help but feel she's trying too hard. My biggest gripe though, comes from the constant mention of Gotham's corruption. I know Gotham is a centerpiece to the show and it's just as much a character as the actual characters, but if the show took more time to SHOW me corruption, then it wouldn't have to keep using exposition lines to tell me. If you just show me, I won't have to roll my eyes so much, because I truly fear they will get stuck that way, and that's not pretty. I do fear it will get old, as we are already 3 episodes in and I feel I should start a drinking game every time someone mentions just how corrupt Gotham is.

Final Verdict: While not a groundbreaking episode of television, it is certainly an engaging one, and plays to the strengths of the show thus far. It's pretty great watching the seemingly unconnected stories unfold, knowing that at some point all of it is going to come together seamlessly.


Some great moments to look for:

The dynamic between Selina and Gordan is electric, and while their time is short it definitely has the underlying allure of the cat who is playing with the mouse knowing how this ends.

Harvey getting tossed around like a ragdoll by a very buff and brawny prostitute.

Robin Lord Taylor serving up major mojo and creep factor as usual. (He's my episode MVP, the guy is perfection as Cobblepot)

Some pretty intense chemistry from two former lovers on opposing sides.

Death by falling corpse. (Has this ever been done? It was pretty awesome)

The final scene.

I repeat, THE FINAL SCENE! It has me anxiously anticipating the follow-up episode, because I most certainly did not see things escalating this quickly.


You don't have to take my word for it though. Catch Gotham on Monday at 7c on Fox and you'll see what I'm talking about, especially in reference to the final scene.

So are you liking Gotham thus far? Where do you think it needs to improve, if you feel there is room for it? What is it that you like? I know some people give it a certain amount of episodes before they decide if they are staying or going with the show, are there any readers who are on the fence? I would love to hear what you think, hit the comments below!

About the Author - Winston Mize
Winston is a 24 year old goofball, born in the north, and currently living in the south. He loves TV.... for some it's coffee, for him it's TV talk that gets his day going. He wants to be a screenwriter, and watches some of everything. You name it, he's probably checked it out. And he would like you to know that it is okay for a 24 year old to play with action figures... well, he does anyway.

31 comments:

  1. Nice preview. I was let down by the pilot as well, Selina Kyle picked up my hopes that the show can repair the dynamic and character issues.
    Jada's Fish Mooney is really awful, I can't take her seriously and she doesn't seem dangerous.
    My favorite part of the show are Jim and Barbara together. So pure and honest, quite the contrast to the city.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks.
    I feel like since the pilot was so much of a story we already knew there wasn't much to peak interest, aside from Jim's handling of the Penguin situation.
    I'm glad I'm not the only one who is not too keen on Jada's portrayal. Something about just rings false.
    As far as Barbara and Jim go...as a couple, pure and honest is what they appear to be, but I would say watch for some cracks to appear in the glass.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nice preview. So glad I'm not the only one who doesn't like Fish Mooney, I tend to look away when she is on.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yeah I assumed their happiness wouldn't last for too long, would be boring if it would stay this nice. But that is somehow the whole theme of the show Trust/Betrayal/Corruption. Who can I trust?
    About the pilot, the story and known facts weren't my issue. It simply felt forced and to needy. Explain all the relationships right away, determine sides, roles, to many characters.But it gathered momentum towards the end just like the 2nd episode. I decided I would watch till mid-season and than make my decision about if I stick with it or move on.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you!


    It really is a relief to know I'm not the only one. For a show I'm supposed to take seriously, she's just so cartoonish.

    ReplyDelete
  6. That's a good plan. I do think by then they should have at least have all the kink's worked out. I did feel that Ivy's inclusion in the pilot was pretty unnecessary other than to pander to fans. It held no real weight, and just annoyed me.


    and yes to see them in bliss all the time would be pretty boring. To quote Logan Echolls "No one writes songs about the ones that come easy" ..so they do need their own obstacles to overcome and I'm okay with that.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I wasn't, but then I'm more easily pleased then others. And once I can grab a chance I'll keep watching. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  8. did you like bruce in the episode

    ReplyDelete
  9. The few moments we saw were okay. Heavy with forshadowing.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Is Selina in a lot of the episode, or her just her 2 or 3 scenes?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Jada's performance is pretty bad. Way too over the top.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Just about maybe 5-7 minutes maybe,

    ReplyDelete
  13. Damn. I'm hoping she gets a bigger role in upcoming episodes.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Me too. The actress who plays her OWNS this role.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Agreed. My number one complaint about the show is that there are just too many characters that Heller is contractually obligated to include in every episode, like Gordon's girlfriend for example. She should just be a recurring character. Not one that pops up in every episode.

    ReplyDelete
  16. First, good preview.
    -I love the whole cast and I think they are doing a very good job, I am personally enjoying JPS as Fish. I think she is doing a good job, is she brilliant? No but I certainly don't think she's awful and I'm excited to see the scene where she finally finds out Pengiun is still alive.
    -I like you love the dynamics between cast members in this show from Bullock and Gordon to Gordon and Selina to Alfred an Bruce. By the way I think the kid playing Bruce is doing a fantastic job, coming from a life long Bats fan.

    Overall I love this show. No show is perfect, but for me as a life long Bats fan I am very satisfied.
    Thanks again for the preview!

    ReplyDelete
  17. This I agree on. It's not that I dislike the actress or character I feel sometimes she just simply doesn't need to be in the ep or scene whatever.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Did the episode reveal what happens to Penguins frat boy hostage?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Still bothered by Pamela Isley's name change.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Nice Preview. Whomever cast Jada Pinkett Smith must not have watched any of her movies. Overacting is just one of her acting issues. She is by far the weakest link in the shows dynamic. Penguin is the highlight thus far.
    This show still has potential. I think it is limited by the restraints of network tv. If it were on say, Showtime or HBO or even FX you could really explore more depth into the violence and corruption of Gotham. I'm in for the long haul. I just hope Fox doesn't ruin it.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I think we are to assume he killed him after the mother thought penguin was joking and wasn't going to pay the ransom.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Me too. Poison Ivy is actually in my top 3 bat villains, so I was annoyed by her name change and her seemingly useless cameo.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Thanks.
    I agree that Jada is the low point and that Robin Lord Taylor is the high.
    I do think that if they were on cable the show could be epic.
    I'm hoping that with the poor state of dramas on fox they let Gotham do its thing and let it shine.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Thanks for reading!
    I guess we must agree to disagree about Jada.
    The cast dynamics are pretty good and I will say I am interested to see what happens when everyone discovers penguin is still alive because several dynamics will change.

    And the kid playing Bruce is pretty good.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I disagree with all of you. I think Fish Mooney is fantastic. I think all of the ensemble cast is fantastic --- Barbara Gordon could use a little depth, personality wise (but I'm curious to find out her history with Montoya). JPS' accent is odd, but its reminiscent of those yuppy white women who say "daaaaahrling, kiss, kiss!"--- but twisted in some way that I haven't quite figured out. She's tiny, hot, fierce, a little crazy, has a surprisingly emotionally side (as we saw with the waiter incident in the Selina Kyle episode), and is in apologetic in her quest for power.

    She's a fascinating character, female or not---villian or not. They've shown enough of her that I want to know more... and that's the yardstick I measure a character's worthiness this early in a series.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Bertha Strongham5 October 2014 at 21:33

    I think JPS is actually quite good. The issue is the overall show itself. It is trying for that "Dick Tracey" vibe, and has all the characters speaking as though they are from a gangster film from the 1930's while all the settings could be from the 1970's or 1980's. I feel as though if the show would pick a time period and keep to it, many of the characters or rather actors would be helped out and would be able to inhabit their characters more comfortably. The ambiguity of time and place aka era, is what is holding the show back. I think the show could have been depicted in any era and would still be relevant.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Bertha Strongham5 October 2014 at 21:39

    I think the whole mention of the corruption within Gotham is really more of a way to show the viewer how complex corruption is. As the people who are supposed to keep the law and order are just as corrupt as the villains. I feels as though the show is trying to illustrate the shades of corruption, as the criminals, that one would think as typically being the evils, can arguably be construed as being the ones that keep the peace within the City. I also think that the show wants to catch the viewers up to a certain place in the story arch of the comic so that it can really begin to tell its story. Right now it is way to early in the show to really say how things are, as they are trying to develop the back drop of the characters.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Fair enough, I think it's trying to go for the Batman Animated Series vibe. Honestly it doesn't bother me personally but I get what you're saying though.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Exactly. It really does seem like Heller is contractually obligated to include her in every episode even if she serves no purpose. Personally I want to see more Bruce and Selina. Perhaps even together, but I have a feeling they're never going to let the two of them meet on-screen. Hope I'm wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I admit, I loved the slow drawl of Fish Mooney. I kind of reminded me of Eartha Kitt without the incessant purring. Jada is great.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Oops it reminded me....she has a dangerous edge to her character. I look forward to seeing her.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.