Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Stitchers - Friends in Low Places - Review


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Stitchers - Friends in Low Places - Review

11 Jun 2015

Share on Reddit


This week Stitchers settles in and starts to find its feet. We started to get to know these characters better and how they will fit in the big picture.

Camille makes dinner for Kirsten in an attempt to apologize for getting her put on academic suspension. Unfortunately, Kirsten doesn’t recognize it as an apology. Once that’s clarified, Kirsten makes it clear she doesn’t accept it. (Personally, I don’t blame her. The academic suspension could have cost Kirsten everything. I’d expect more groveling.)

Later at the Stitchers Central, Kirsten is ready to get down to the job of finding out what happened to Ed. Cameron is worried about Kirsten’s safety. He’s concerned that something may be wrong with the system. Kirsten wasn’t supposed to be able to touch anything in the previous Stitch, because nothing is solid or touchable in a Stitch. He doesn’t want her in there until he’s certain she’ll be safe. Nice moment to illustrate that he may like to call out Star Trek dialog as he’s running a Stitch, but he does know it’s not a game and what’s at stake. But because he has no evidence that whatever happened to Marta will definitely happen to Kirsten, she climbs into her seat and is ready to go. Before the system boots up, it powers down.

Maggie announces that Ed can wait. At this moment I decided that Maggie is one of the bad guys. An 18-year-old, whom we later find out is the daughter of a judge, died of a drug overdose. This drug is, apparently, so bad that they can’t afford to let it into LA. This case is top priority.

Kirsten doesn’t see the point in putting the 18-year-old first. Her sample is fresh; Ed’s isn’t, so Ed should go first. The writers seem to have settled on who Kirsten is and what makes her character different from the others. Kirsten is blunt. There’s no stopping to think how someone will react to her words or choosing her words more carefully to, for example, to soften someone up so she can get her way. She just says what she’s thinking and I love it.

Meanwhile, Detective Fischer is back. He’s trying to figure out why Kirsten has the juice to avoid being taken into custody. He is told to let it go and is then handed the same case that Kirsten and the team were just assigned. In other shows where the police and the special team don’t know they’re on the same case, the police usually get a case that doesn’t appear to be related. I like the fact that both teams are, literally, working the same case. I was immediately looking forward to any and all scenes where the two teams would show up at the same location.

Kirsten is in a rush to finish this assignment. It is her only roadblock to Stitching into Ed. No one holds her up though, and finally she’s able to Stitch into the dead girl’s mind.

There’s no repeat of any technical issues, but, because Lisa died from a drug overdose, the Stitch is a little trippy. (Liked Kirsten yelling into everyone’s headset because she’s in a room with really loud music.) Kirsten tries to process what she’s seeing but it’s difficult because of the drugs. People turn into monsters. Just before Kirsten bounces out, she sees someone forcing the drugs into Lisa’s mouth. They now know that Lisa was murdered.

During the post Stitch meeting, Kristen informs everyone that Lisa was trying to protect someone. She mentions the issues she had with the Stitch because the drugs made everyone look like monsters. This led to an interesting flashback of Ed looking under Kirsten’s bed when she was a little girl. I found it really interesting that Kirsten, a woman with real difficulty connecting to people, would have such a normal childhood fear. It intrigued me. It also made me really like Ed and has me convinced that there is a really interesting back story here.

The last half of this scene had me distrusting every character involved. Unfortunately I’m not entirely convinced that was intentional on the writers’ part. First she’s told that she can’t Stitch into Ed until this case is completed. She asks to Stitch back into Lisa to get more information and close this case as quickly as possible. Cameron announces that it’s impossible because of something called an Absolute Refractory Period that lasts 5-12 hours. Because the drug case is officially on hold, she asks again to Stitch into Ed. But nnnooooo, that still can’t happen because the system can only be calibrated to one subject at a time. It all feels artificial and conspiratorial. I wish we’d been given this information in a manner that felt more organic to the story. As it is, it feels to me that the writers are trying to find a way to hold off on solving the mystery surrounding Kirsten’s father and guardian. Which is okay. I just wish they had been more subtle.

Kirsten smoothly cons Cameron into taking her out for a bit of field work. Cameron is hurt that he’s been lied to by a teammate. He feels they need to trust each other. (The previous scene left me feeling distrustful of Cameron, so I chuckled when he said that.) Kirsten informs him that she is NOT a member of his team. She’s paying the price required to allow her to Stitch into Ed. She tries to apologize to Cameron for hurting his feelings. Apparently, she’s as bad at giving apologies as she is at accepting them.

They get the name of another potential witness and determine they have to go to a rave. Kirsten’s roommate invites herself along. Linus joins them. At the rave they find the girl they’re looking for and try to convince her to come with them. She takes off with her boyfriend. They try to follow, but run into Detective Fischer in the parking lot. Armed with a taser, he orders them to the ground.



Kirsten, who it appears has not been asked to sign a non-disclosure agreement, has no patience for this. She tells the Detective everything. She even takes him (and Camille) to Stitchers headquarters. I knew their confrontation was going to be fun and I was NOT disappointed.


Maggie is so upset by this that she outs Camille as a spy. Camille received tuition and expenses in exchange for reports on Kirsten. This explains the academic suspension that made no sense to me in the pilot. Maggie needed Kirsten in a vulnerable position, so she had Camille file the charges. Kirsten, logical woman that she is, accepts that the deal Camille got was indeed really good, but the betrayal of trust is a pretty big one.

Maggie offers Detective Fischer a job. A cop could be useful. As soon as Kirsten identifies the killer (Surprise! The Refactory period was real and not a stalling tactic.), Maggie demands Fischer get them a search warrant. They get their man and his computer records and finish Lisa’s goal of rescuing Denise.

When the team returns to Stitcher Central, Kirsten is set to Stitch into Ed. Linus stops them. He hands Cameron the data leaving it to him to break the news to Kirsten. Smart move on Linus’ part. Kirsten is not happy at all. But she doesn’t take it out on the messenger. She, rightly IMHO, goes straight to Maggie. Maggie tries to turn it back on Kirsten by telling her it’s her fault because it took her too long to solve Lisa’s murder.

I’ve officially filed Maggie under the heading ‘villain’. I think Kirsten is right. There is something Maggie doesn’t want her to know. Instead of answering Kirsten’s questions, Maggie offers to send all of Ed’s belongings to Kirsten. It’s a start. Maggie gives everyone a pep talk about the good they did with this case. Kirsten has another flashback to Ed checking under her bed for monsters. She informs Maggie that she hates monsters and signs on. (I’m thinking a non-disclosure agreement is in Kirsten’s near future, so Maggie can stop Kirsten telling people about the Stitchers program every time she needs to get past a roadblock.)

In the final scene we get an answer to what happened to Marta. Cameron pays her a visit in her hospital room. She’s in a coma. Does this bode ill for Kirsten, or are the differences in her brain the thing that allows her to survive the procedure? Is this the reason Maggie needed Kirsten on the project?

This is the first real episode of the series, and it was all the fun that the last half of the pilot promised. I am starting to like Linus and Cameron together. They’re a bantering team. Camille won me over as well. I would have loved to watch the scene where Camille coaxed Kirsten into her rave appropriate outfit.

ABCFamily seems to like shows with hidden mysteries. With a couple of the network’s canceled series, it seemed as though the bulk of the potential audience wasn’t as willing as I to wait for the clues and answers to be revealed. That trend (the slow reveal) seems present here as well. We’ve only gotten small clues so far and I am intrigued. I hope the audience finds the crime solving aspect of the show as much fun as I do and that the series stays on the air long enough for us to get all of the answers promised.

Favorite moment: Maggie outing Camille by accusing Camille of outing herself.

About the Author - Prpleight
Prpleight is a screenwriter and senior software engineer with solid geek cred. When not writing code, screenplays, or watching TV (sometimes she does all three at the same time), she uses her broadsword Bessie to battle evil. She's been a frequent contributor to the SpoilerTV discussion boards for several years now. Currently, she's reviewing Stitchers and Major Crimes.
Recent Reviews (All Reviews)

22 comments:

  1. I really enjoyed the episode this week. It's looking like Stitchers will hit my summer much watch list. What did you guys think?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great review! I'm addicted to this show. I think it's a good sign of the direction the network seems to be moving. I look forward to watching the Camille and Kirsten duo evolve as Kirsten starts to get a basic understanding of emotion. Should be a fun journey to watch.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks.

    I hope that, as Kirsten starts to get a handle on emotions, she doesn't lose that blunt edge. It's already one of my favorite things about her.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I didn't see the Absolute Refractory Period as a stall at all actually, it made sense to me. Did you like Cameron and Kirsten dancing and actually seeing Kirsten smile for a change? I'd put Baptiste as a totalitarian and not so much a "villain". After all she's their boss and the boss can't be the Big Bad unless they're "The Flash" LOL.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think as she evolves she'll lose a tiny bit of that bluntness, but I think it's so fundamentally part of her that she won't ever lose it all. I think it's a very interesting character trait and makes her quite unique, so they'll hold onto as much of it as the story will allow them to.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have to agree about Maggie, I don't really see her as a villain. I think she's in a tough spot as she's caught between her team and the government, but when push comes to shove I have a feeling she'll protect the team. I feel as though they are on the verge of getting ready to introduce us a "villain", but I do not foresee it being Maggie. I do however predict Maggie will end up stuck in some very precarious positions as she tries to navigate the landscape of the world Stitchers is building. Will be interesting to see how they orchestrate the introduction of a villain or adversary for Kirsten and the team.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think I'm just naturally suspicious of these things. I know, in a TV show they can't stand there and give us the list of rules all at one time, it would be boring. But when you have a character that is anxious to get something done and every time there is a hopeful step forward there's a never before mentioned reason why it can't happen I start to wonder...and when all of those reasons are listed in one scene....my radar goes up. I think that's why I wished it had been more subtle.


    You are probably right about Maggie...or it might just be that she has her boss too.


    It's just that I found myself really on Kirsten's side, especially where finding out what happened to Ed is concerned and DARN IT Maggie kept blocking her. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think and i may be WAY off but i think the villain will be Marta, am i crazy? Yeah i feels the same way about Baptiste.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Aw that's nice, you feel protective over Kirsten already? LOL. You have to remember too that we don't know all the rules to Stitching yet, it's not like they time-jumped whereas Kirsten is basically a veteran at being a Stitcher, it was still the same day when the episode began and then the day after.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It's a possibility they could go that route with Marta but they'll need to provide some buildup to that first. Would be interesting to watch her and Kirsten go at it.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Jeffrey A. Schechter12 June 2015 at 15:02

    Thanks so much for the thoughtful (and thought provoking!) recap. I also like everyone's insights into the show. Keep 'em coming!

    ReplyDelete
  12. I was really liking this show (especially the whole "She's a female Sheldon Cooper" thing) until it became obvious that that Cameron character was going to be her main love interest. I hate the whole She's uptight/He's life dynamic. It always comes across as sexist to me to show women falling in love with men who spend a lot of time verbally abusing them and mocking them.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Glad you're enjoying it.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I pretty much agree with you. On the one hand I have for years been annoyed at the idea that a man and woman cannot work together without falling in love. On the other hand I think they've flipped She/He dynamic you mention because she seems to be falling more into the "abusing them and mocking them" category. (I agree it's sexist. It's a sexism that the entire romantic comedy genre is built on.)


    Both topics (the rom/com paradigm and the co-workers must fall in love ) are on my rant list. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  15. Thank you. I'm really please you enjoyed it.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Oh, I LOVE that idea! That could be so much fun.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Did you ever see a movie called Dreamscape? It was made in 1984. When you mentioned Marta and Kirsten going at it I immediately thought they would be doing so during a Stitch and that just led me to that movie.

    ReplyDelete
  18. So a Dark Stitchers Program?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Uh oh. I hadn't gone that far. :-)


    Are you thinking Quantum Leap or Tru Calling?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Never saw Quantum Leap but if Kirsten's Tru then Marta's Jack,

    ReplyDelete
  21. I think the "She's uptight/He's life" dynamic pretty much only appeals to teenage girls (which seems to be ABC family's target audience nowadays). The adult women I speak to about on-screen romances all say they would like to see more male leads who are gentlemen rather than the snarky jackasses.

    ReplyDelete
  22. It's the drama/conflict thing. I suppose when you're telling a story about a relationship you have to find conflict within the relationship. Though when you're talking about influences on young people it would be nice if there was the "ideal" present for contrast. There are too many young people (it's not just girls) with real problems because of media influences (elective plastic surgery at 15?)

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.