Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Stitchers - Connections - Review


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Stitchers - Connections - Review

20 Jun 2015

Share on Reddit



For me this episode wasn’t as good as the last episode. They delved into one of the side effects of Stitching but between the directing and performances I felt they were less successful than they could have been.

I did not like the cold open. These kinds of ‘end first’ opens only work when the tension is so high the viewer has to keep watching so they can out what is happening and how the story got to that point. This scene had zero tension. It’s obvious that Kirsten has lured the killer to this location and she’s laying out the case against him. She, as usual, isn’t afraid of the situation. There are no questions raised that we need to watch to get the answers to. This isn’t a case of them trying to create tension and failing, it’s a poor choice of scene to open the episode with.

For me the episode would have been better served by opening with the Kirsten and Camille. Camille has convinced Kirsten to start bringing some of Ed’s boxes into the house and going through them. She envisions a treasure trove of interesting old stuff…that they can sell. They find an old tube style stereo system and another clue to the arching mystery; a torn picture of Ed, Kirsten’s mother and…who? This scene was far more interesting than the previous scene.

Kirsten goes to Maggie about the photo. Maggie guesses the person ripped out of the photo was someone Ed didn’t like very much. She does tell Kirsten that her mother, father and Ed worked together on the Stitcher technology. We get another fun cat & mouse scene between Kirsten and Maggie. Kirsten wants to know why Maggie insists on withholding selected information. Maggie withholds that information. I’m waiting for the day Maggie lets something go.

Linus shows the young men watching how NOT to woo 21st century woman. He insults Kirsten and Camille by implying they couldn’t possibly figure out how to fix that old stereo system without the big genius men to do it for them. Linus is clueless. Even after Cameron tells him he needs to learn how to talk to women (his mother doesn’t count) Linus seems confused.

Its time for our Stitch of the week. A young newlywed, Lilly, was robbed and killed at the Santa Monica Pier. Her jewelry was stolen. This isn’t the first robbery but it is the first murder so they get the case.

In the Stitch Kirsten sees that the husband lied to Lilly just before he walked off and left her alone. While he was on the phone she’s attacked. Lilly’s memory is affected by the blow to the head so her memory begins to jump around. Kirsten is dropped into an earlier memory. It’s a bit of a jumble and she gets several snippets of the last days of Lilly’s life. What she sees leave her suspicious of the husband. Kirsten bounces and announces that the husband, Scott, had enough cash on hand to pay for a hitman but for some reason she still feels he’s innocent.

Kirsten and Camille explore why Kirsten believes this guy is innocent as they work on the old radio. Camille finds an old cassette tape left by Ed that says “For When I’m Gone.” Kirsten has a flashback from when she was a little girl and Ed gave her the cassette. We don’t get the full picture of this flashback yet.

I think this is the moment that I realized that not all of my issues with the episode were performance related. Kirsten’s look up and away ‘I’m having a flashback’ signal was heavy handed and cliche. I would have expected the director to fix that.

Det. Fischer, our new resident cop, brings Scott in for questioning. Kirsten wanted to be present because Scott’s actions in the Stitch don’t match up with how Lilly felt about him. The questioning frustrates Kirsten because Fischer never asked about the clues Kirsten picked up during the Stitch. His response that if he can’t explain how he knows something he cannot ask the suspect about it.

Kirsten’s tries to convince Fischer that Scott is innocent by pointing out Scott didn’t ask for a lawyer. ‘Guilty people ask for a lawyer not innocent people.’ (One of the reasons so many innocent people wind up having to fight to prove their innocence. Innocent people should have lawyers too!) Kirsten being Kirsten charges into the interrogation room and starts questioning Scott. She freaks the poor man out by asking questions about things no one could know.

Kirsten’s certainty of Scott’s innocence is built upon left over emotions she picked up from Lilly. We are told several times during the rest of the episode that Kirsten was feeling residual effects of Lilly’s emotions. Cameron tells her that the Stitch has changed her; made her different.

Unfortunately, this element of the episode was difficult for me to watch because it left me feeling that Emma Ishta wasn’t up to the job. I needed to see a change in Kirsten’s character. Instead I was told that’s what I was supposed to be seeing. The change was in the dialog but not in the performance.

Kirsten Stitches again and begins to understand the flashes she saw earlier. She now knows that Scott was telling the truth when he explained that the lies she saw in the first stitch were him setting up surprises for his new bride. In addition, Kirsten emerges with a new suspect: the couple’s limo driver. Everyone is startled when the LA PD finds the driver and confirms his alibi.

Cameron is more concerned about Kirsten than he was last week. His guilt over what happened to Marta is causing him to try to force Kirsten to be careful; something Kirsten is not inclined to do.

Kirsten talks to Scott, but her efforts to comfort him only upset him further. She does find out who ordered the limo. This gives her an idea.

Camille invited Linus and Cameron over to help put together the old radio. Cameron is off trying to keep Kirsten out of trouble so they’re on their own. They get the radio working then have one of those meaningful near kiss moments. Moments later they’re going at it on the floor. Given that these actors have no chemistry whatsoever I do not buy the ‘we couldn’t keep our hands off of each other scenario.’

Cameron, as usual, goes along with Kirsten’s plan. This time she places for them to set themselves up as bait. Her plan works. But they may not have the back up they think they have because instead of texting Fischer that they’re with the killer, Kirsten texts Camille, who is a teeny bit preoccupied, and asks her to text Fischer.

Kirsten is a little off with her theory. The limo driver isn’t the killer. His partner is. For a change Cameron doesn’t just stand back and let Kirsten handle the situation. He knocks the killer out with a bucket (extra lucky because Cameron needs to excuse himself to vomit.)

Kirsten says goodbye to Scott by fixing his collar in the way Lilly always did. I am convinced the man thinks the ghost of his dead wife was watching over him. Not a bad thing from Scott's perspective.

Kirsten and Cameron return to the house to find a very awkward Camille and Linus. After dinner Kirsten finds the cassette tape and puts it in the machine. Ed made it for her, when she was a little girl, so she wouldn't miss bedtime stories while he was out of town on business. Young Kirsten drops it in the garbage. (It wasn’t clear if this was because she was angry with Ed for leaving or if she just didn’t care. Given that her father dumped her it could have gone either way.) Grown up Kirsten finally plays the tape.

As Ed reads the story (Sleeping Beauty) I thought it was a nice way to clue the audience in on how happy Ed and his wife were to have Kirsten with them. (Too bad her personality quirks seem to have frequently hurt their feelings.)

Ed reading Sleeping beauty plays over several short scenes:

Maggie reveals that she has the rest of the photo. Maggie is the third person in the photo. I understood that Maggie knows more about the program than she’s let on but I hadn’t expected Maggie to be friends with Kirsten’s father.

Marta wakes up in the hospital.

There were some nice things about the episode. Unfortunately, I had some real issues. The backbone of the episode was Kirsten being affected by the Stitch and I just didn’t think the actress was up to the job of making me believe it. I wanted to like this episode a lot more than I did.

I liked the initial discovery in Ed’s belongings and the fact that Camille and Kirsten are becoming friends. I still like the scenes between Kirsten and Maggie. I like the energy of the two of them having a battle of wits. Cameron and Kirsten are gelling into a team and it's really nice that what happened to Marta is still with him. Kirsten isn't a throwaway tool for him to use to get his job done. I also like the way the murder mystery worked out. The three person robbery ring worked well in a show that needs to keep some mystery when the investigator has the best witness of all...the victim.

I hope that they’re able to get back to the level of the second episode (or better.) What did you guys think about this episode? Did you enjoy it?

About the Author - Prpleight
Prpleight is a screenwriter and senior software engineer with solid geek cred. When not writing code, screenplays, or watching TV (sometimes she does all three at the same time), she uses her broadsword Bessie to battle evil. She's been a frequent contributor to the SpoilerTV discussion boards for several years now. Currently, she's reviewing Stitchers.
Recent Reviews (All Reviews)

12 comments:

  1. Very curious to hear what everyone thought of the episode. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm not done with this episode yet do I haven't finished, but I did read your comment about the cold open and wanted to mention that I've seen this type of cold open more and more lately, and I don't like it. They usually are still good episodes, but it plays like a cheap trick. Alias used that type of opening scene a few times and it always worked, but on shows that are just starting it really just is ineffective in its goal.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great point about doing this on new shows. I hadn't thought of it that way. Every time I can think of where this type of opening worked for me, it was a situation where a character I cared about was in serious jeopardy and that emotional connection pulled me in. Generally with new shows the audience doesn't yet have that kind of connection to the characters.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I really like the concept of Kristen experiencing feelings and slowly becoming more loving and not so cold-hearted. I do really like this show but on the same note I don't like it at all. I will defs watch the next episode tho :) Thanks for the review. :D

    ReplyDelete
  5. This episode just introduced us to Kirsten's arch-enemy in Marta, what did you think of Cameron having tears in his eyes? Yeah i was surprised that it was Baptiste in the picture, you need to see the new "On This Season" promo they put out, it's INSANE! They also have Oded Fehr in that promo.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "In Media Res" openings or cold opening as you called it, are probably
    not that effective in a relatively straight forward procedural episode. If the scene had one of the other characters besides the two leads, than maybe you might have at least that there was real jeopardy. If the crime was more complex, maybe there would have been one clue in the opening that would have been worthy of the In Media Res opening, but all the writers did was give away the name of the killer's accomplice in that scene.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I saw that promo. I AM AN ODED FEHR FAN! hee hee


    I wonder how they're planning to make an arch enemy work...is she going to be piggybacking on Kirsten's stitches?

    ReplyDelete
  8. I quit working a­t m­­y desk j­­o­­b and since then I have a profit of Eighty-Five Bucks each h. Wondering how? I work over internet! My old job was bad for me ,s­o I made a decision to take my chance on something new… Two yrs have passed since And I can say I couldn't be happier! Let me show you what i do...< w­w­w.P­a­y-R­e­v­i­e­w.c­o­m >

    ReplyDelete
  9. Right?! he ROCKS!!! I think he is DEFINITELY Kirsten's father, and yeah that's what i'm guessing Marta will do.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Totally agree with everything you’re saying. I feel like this show has done nothing to wow me yet and I’m having a really hard time getting past Kirsten’s obnoxious personality. I too would like to see her character change a bit more with the victim’s personality. This show actually reminds me so much of iZombie. I don't know if you watch that show, but the main character eats a victim's brains, sees their memories and takes on their traits. In my opinion, that show, and the actress, do that so well that the comparison really makes Stitchers seem kind of like a cheap rip off of a much better show. Idk... I'm still going to watch but only because it's conveniently timed for my schedule. But I won't be going out of my way to keep up. Anyways, you had some really thought-provoking comments here, thanks for the review! :)

    ReplyDelete
  11. I am really starting to enjoy this show, wasn't getting into it the first episode but somehow I can see myself watching it in the future. Just hope it doesn't get cancelled yet..

    ReplyDelete
  12. I like the unique concept of this show and although the pilot was a little shaky, the last few episodes have shown some improvement to the point where I think if they hit their stride this show has a lot of potential. I really like Camille, all of her interactions with the other characters are the most memorable parts - she's definitely more interesting to me so far than Kirsten.

    Also loved that they used "Call Me" by St. Paul & The Broken Bones during that scene when Camille is cleaning up and Kirsten and Cameron talk about what love is.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.