Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon POLL: Favorite Scene in Game of Thrones - Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

POLL: Favorite Scene in Game of Thrones - Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken

18 May 2015

Share on Reddit
About the Author - Lisa Macklem
I do interviews and write articles for the site in addition to reviewing a number of shows, including Supernatural, Arrow, Agents of Shield, The Walking Dead, Game of Thrones, Forever, Defiance, Bitten, Glee, and a few others! Highlights of this past year include covering San Diego Comic Con as press and a set visit to Bitten. When I'm not writing about television shows, I'm often writing about entertainment and media law in my capacity as a legal scholar. I also work in theatre when the opportunity arises. I'm an avid runner and rider, currently training in dressage.

60 comments:

  1. Baelish' scheming is always a delight, especially when manipulating an abhorrent of a woman in Cersei.

    ReplyDelete
  2. For me the only real stand out scene this week was Jorah and Tyrion's heart to heart...
    It showed some real emotion without feeling over-the-top or forced. Both Peter Dinklage and Iain Glen were brilliant!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Debsterforever18 May 2015 at 09:53

    I can't write what I think about the people who voted for the last scene...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ondřej Byzon Kazda18 May 2015 at 14:31

    This. How that could have been a favourite scene for someone is beyond me.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I like how you couch Sansa's rape in prettied up language. Euphemisms are so much more palatable.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Giorgio Corrado18 May 2015 at 15:04

    Cersei, Cersei, Cersei how long before the Sparrow starts looking at your sins and asks the question of your children being bastards ? OOPS not so clean are we !!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I found the wedding be really beautiful. Sophia turned into this great actress and channels her inner Stark so well.

    And why are people voting for the sex scene?

    ReplyDelete
  8. "Favorite" doesn't only mean that you like it/it's beautiful - it can also mean favorite powerful or series/character changing scene. It just means that it was the scene that stood out for you the most.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I canNOT wait for Cersei to get hers!

    ReplyDelete
  10. "Favorite" doesn't only mean that you like it/it's beautiful - it can also mean favorite powerful or series/character changing scene. It just means that it was the scene that stood out for you the most.

    ReplyDelete
  11. "Favorite" doesn't only mean that you like it/it's beautiful - it can also mean favorite powerful or series/character changing scene. It just means that it was the scene that stood out for you the most. (see above)

    ReplyDelete
  12. I loved the moment when Tyrion realized that Jorah didn't know about his father's death and how even though Tyrion hated his own father, he knew how painful this news was to Jorah....

    ReplyDelete
  13. Part of the horror of that scene for me was Ramsey's euphemism.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Yeah, I get that. I give U the character changing part. Overall I found the scene quite forced and put there just for the shock effect.

    ReplyDelete
  15. We'll have to agree to disagree there. I thought the scene was exceptionally well done. We were forced to watch through Theon's eyes rather than the act itself.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Considering the number of people I've seen who don't think it was rape at all, I'd appreciate it if real life media would stop using euphemisms. Call a spade a spade.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I agree. I thougt it was a horrible moment, but I was still kind of relieved the writers didn't make Sansa suffer what happened to Ramsey's bride in the books

    ReplyDelete
  18. Well, come back for my actual review. I will certainly mention the euphemism, but I will also talk about the rape.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Yep. Completely agree.

    ReplyDelete
  20. It was pervy to even list it on the poll. Especially to describe it in those words.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I disagree. The word favorite carries with it the implication of liking something.

    ReplyDelete
  22. So now we rank our favorite torture scenes ?

    ReplyDelete
  23. So now we applaud gratuitous sadism if it is well done ?

    ReplyDelete
  24. I wouldn't partake..
    Even if I realize torture scenes sometimes need to be included in some episodes, I find them distasteful.

    ReplyDelete
  25. We always have.
    That's why The Passion of Christ was nominated for so many awards.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I can only tell you what the criteria is for "Favorite Scene" here at SpoilerTv.

    ReplyDelete
  27. It's hardly "gratuitous" if there is a deeper meaning to what is going on. I wouldn't watch a show that I thought was that superficial.

    ReplyDelete
  28. But you did not call Sansa's scene distasteful - you called it "powerful". Misters Dan and David indulged in some sick manipulation of their fans in this particular retrofitting of the story for TV.

    ReplyDelete
  29. The two words are not mutually exclusive to me.

    Case in point, the 1985 movie KIDS.
    I found it utterly disturbing and often very distasteful, but yet powerful.

    Likewise, I found the Sansa rape scene very well executed. It was visceral and disturbing. I can appreciate the skill used to make me feel that way. That does not stop me from finding torture and rape (and other violent acts) distasteful.

    it does not matter if its is a "good" or "bad" feeling, I can appreciate scenes that make me feel strongly either way. Art is supposed to evoke emotion - not only happy emotions.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Look, you have your own opinion. I just feel that rather than being art it was more blatant exploitation.

    ReplyDelete
  31. What's the deeper meaning that couldn't be conveyed without Sansa's character regression?

    ReplyDelete
  32. I too cringed at our poll-mistress's choice of words for that particular poll item - merciful heavens what was she thinking - I plant my grayscaled foot firmly on the phrase used

    ReplyDelete
  33. I don't think you are going to convince anyone who is a fan of the books...

    ReplyDelete
  34. The whole point is even WITH her character progression she was helpless to avoid this. Most women are helpless in this society - with some amazingly wonderful exceptions. All of whom have been through great trauma - as have most of the male leaders. Come back are read my review.

    ReplyDelete
  35. By *this* do you mean the sex or do you mean the rape? Because my whole point is that WITH her character progression, she wasn't helpless at all. Keep the following points in mind when you write the review:


    1. Sansa should have no illusions about these guys - Boltons are her enemies and if she wants to avenge her family (the whole point of going there, really) then she needs to make them dead. She should also know that the Boltons aren't particularly fond of her either - they only need her for her name. What they did to Theon should only serve as a reminder of how cruel they could be. Unlike with Joffrey and Cersei, this time, she should be walking into it with her eyes wide open and either have a plan to ensure her own safety and well-being or be constantly working on one.



    2. She should know that her name is the only currency she has. But unlike King's Landing, its worth a lot more in the North. Try to parley that into an advantage - ask Roose to invite other Northern Lords to witness the wedding (In the Books, Roose invites a lot of other Lords to *prove* to them that his son is marrying a Stark - the whole point of the wedding - and that their claim is legitimate now). Sansa could use the same thing here to delay the wedding (and therefore, the bedding) and get in touch with potentially powerful allies.



    3. Littlefinger told her to "make this boy Ramsey her own" and she has seen Margery do that with Joffrey. Where are her attempts to charms Ramsey? She is getting a lot of information, left and right, Walda pregnant, Myranda jealous, Ramsey insecure etc. any of which she could use on Ramsey. I'm not saying that she should be able to hatch a Machiavellian scheme where her enemies take each-other out (though that would be awesome) - but atleast she should use it to get closer to her target.



    4. She should've known and understood what was coming tonight and she should've prepared herself for it. Remember that great whore speech from Littlefinger in season 1 - I was expecting something like that from Sansa - Ramsay is never going to forget that she is a Stark who is supposed to hate him, but he can be made to believe that he is winning her over.



    5. Or, if all this was too tough for her, she could've picked the escape option. She knows that people out there are willing to help her escape. She also knows that Stannis is close and he is likely to provide her with sanctuary. In fact, Stannis might actually welcome her with open arms - all the Northern Lords who are still loyal to Robb Stark would come flocking to his side now.



    Sansa had all these options and her character progression is supposed to mean that she is smart enough to see them and brave enough to attempt them - she did nothing, which is why is looks like character regression.

    ReplyDelete
  36. The "sex" was rape. There is no distinction between the two. You, like Baelish, vastly over estimate Sansa. She is nowhere near doing any of those things. I will be writing my review based upon my reading of the episode - the entire episode.

    ReplyDelete
  37. The "sex" was rape. There is no distinction between the two.

    There is a pretty big distinction - and its called consent. Sansa may not want to have sex with Ramsay, she may be revolted by the idea and the man - but she could still choose to agree to it rather than just letting it happen. She didn't and was once again a "bystander to tragedy".

    You, like Baelish, vastly over estimate Sansa. She is nowhere near doing any of those things.


    Sansa isn't capable of figuring out that the Boltons are monsters?



    She isn't capable of asking Roose to invite other lords to the wedding?


    She isn't capable of flirting with Ramsay? Smiling at him and talking to him?


    She isn't capable of faking pleasure in his company?



    They are not that hard - she should be capable of doing atleast some of those.

    ReplyDelete
  38. "She could choose to agree to it" ARE YOU SERIOUS? She did not want to have sex with him PERIOD. THAT is rape.

    ReplyDelete
  39. And that's the difference between being a player in the game and a pawn. You think Cersei wanted to have sex with Robert after the first time? Did Margery want to have sex with Joffrey? Did Osha want to have sex with Theon?

    Women on GoT have limited weapons available to them - but sex is one of them. They often have sex with people they don't want to sleep with in order to gain the necessary advantage. That is a choice that Sansa abdicated - which makes her a victim and a pawn, not a player.

    ReplyDelete
  40. I find your definition of consent abhorrent.

    ReplyDelete
  41. So, by your definition, if a woman doesn't want to have sex with a guy, but does so anyway because she has something to gain from it or because she wants to manipulate him - she was raped?

    ReplyDelete
  42. Loras' trial !!

    ReplyDelete
  43. Rape, according to Black's Legal Dictionary, "unlawful sexual intercourse committed by a man with a woman through force and against her will..... without consent and usually by force or threat of injury."
    As for your question - "if a woman doesn't want to have sex with a guy" - I don't need to go any further than that to determine it is rape. Any other niceties you want to hang on your explanation are simply coercion.
    A woman may want to have sex for many reasons - but if she doesn't for _any_ reason, and still feels that she has to, it is rape.

    ReplyDelete
  44. AGREE! Thanks for adding it here - it was definitely on my long list.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Rape, according to Black's Legal Dictionary, "unlawful sexual
    intercourse committed by a man with a woman through force and against
    her will..... without consent and usually by force or threat of injury."

    Looks like Black supports my definition against yours. I see the term "against her will", but not "against her want".

    As for your question - "if a woman doesn't want to have sex with a guy" -
    I don't need to go any further than that to determine it is rape. Any
    other niceties you want to hang on your explanation are simply coercion.


    So, according to you, "woman wanting to manipulate a man" or "woman expecting to gain something from him" - that's the same as a man coercing a woman? Your definition is the abhorrent one.

    A woman may want to have sex for many reasons - but if she doesn't for _any_ reason, and still feels that she has to, it is rape.


    So, by your logic:



    Cersei didn't want to have sex with Robert for 17 years. (that she did it regularly to hide the true parentage of her children was Robert coercing her).
    Margery wouldn't want to have sex with Joffrey. (that she would've to consolidate her power is Joffrey coercing her)
    Osha didn't want to have sex with Theon. (That she offered it herself to get a chance at rescuing the Starks at night was Theon coercing her).


    So, basically, all three women were raped (Margery *would've* been raped, but still) and Cersei had the worst of it. She was raped repeatedly for 17 years.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Clearly _you_ are not a lawyer. Neither the law nor common decency support your views.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Favorite LIKE scene: Jorah/ Tyrion
    Powerful (but disturbing) scenes: Sansa/ Ramsay (and Sansa/ Myranda):
    Altho Sansa gets raped at the end of the episode - both that scene and her scene with Myranda are powerful. the scene with Myranda (and Theon) shows us that Sansa isn't just gonna 'suffer' as she did in Kings Landing. she (to a certain extent) knows how fucked up Ramsay is and she knew (to a certain extent) what would happen on her wedding night (obviously not the theon part) - to me she's just biding her time - enduring Ramsay until the right mmt to strike. (- she has started to play the game of thrones - which is above all a game of patience, and using things to your advantage - also really cant believe that Petyr would leave her with the boltons with a bit more in her arsenal)
    So from this I do think Ramsay will continue to abuse her in the sick way that he does - but I do hope it wont be like Jeyne in the books... Sansa (and Petyr?) have something planned...

    ReplyDelete
  48. Dominick Grace21 May 2015 at 13:46

    King Lear is my favourite Shakespeare play. it is also the most bleak, despairing play written prior to the twentieth century. "Liking" something does not mean you endorse what you see, or that it makes you feel good. It means that you find its artistry somehow profound or powerful. Admittedly, in the internet age, when the concept gets reduced to things like "favouriting" 5,000 web pages, or "liking" every third cat video you see, that notion can get lost.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Dominick Grace21 May 2015 at 13:47

    So you object to euphemisms with . . . a metaphor? ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  50. Actually both do. And I don't have to be a lawyer to know that.

    ReplyDelete
  51. The last scene was so horrible it made me cry. And that is the reason I voted for it - it was the only scene in this episode that left/awekened feelings in me.

    ReplyDelete
  52. My two law degrees would indicate that a law degree does give you a better understanding of the actual law. Thankfully, you are simply wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Two law degrees should give you a better understanding, but they seem to have failed to do so in your case. By the very definition you provided, rape is "unlawful sexual intercourse committed by a man with a woman through
    force and against her will..... without consent and usually by force or
    threat of injury" - the key phrase being "against her will", not "against her desire". A woman can consent to having sex with a man she does not desire sexually in order to accomplish other goals and that is not rape.



    But, there is an easy way to prove me wrong - show me a case where a woman of sound judgment consented to have sex with someone she didn't want to sleep with, without any threat or coercion present and later claimed rape and the courts decided in her favor. Because that would demonstrate that the court does not see a difference between "want" and "will".

    ReplyDelete
  54. I don't have to "prove" you wrong. You are. It's not consent if she doesn't want to have sex. Clearly, you have trouble with the English language. You are also "arguing" two totally different scenarios.

    "A woman can consent to having sex with a man she does not desire sexually in order to accomplish other goals" is NOT the same as having "sex with someone she didn't want to sleep with."



    I'm done discussing this with you.

    ReplyDelete
  55. A claim without proof is meaningless. So yes, you do have to prove me wrong. Didn't they teach you that in law-school?

    And clearly, you are the one having a problem with the subtleties of English language if you equate "want to have sex" with "consent". "Want to have sex" speaks only to sexual desire - it says nothing about any other aspects of the situation which may affect the decision making process. These other aspects may result in the woman agreeing to have sex even if she doesn't want to - but as long as those other aspects are not some form of force, coercion or threats, its not rape.

    ReplyDelete
  56. I pity the women in your life.

    ReplyDelete
  57. And I pity those who take legal advice from you. What does that have to do with anything?

    ReplyDelete
  58. Dominick Grace26 May 2015 at 18:38

    About five minutes if internet searching:

    in D.C., you could be charged with first degree sexual abuse if you
    cause a person to submit to a sex act using any of the following
    tactics: by physically forcing them; by threatening them; by rendering
    them unconscious; or by drugging them. This crime can be punished with
    up to life in prison. You could be charged with second degree sexual
    abuse if you have sex with someone when you have reason to know that
    they are incapable of knowing what's going on, incapable of saying no,
    or incapable of "communicating unwillingness" to have sex. This crime
    can be punished with up to 20 years in prison. In these crimes, the
    rapist is aware that their victim does not want to participate in the
    sex act, and does it anyway ("no means no"), or is aware that their
    victim cannot consent, and does it anyway ("passed out means no").

    Misdemeanor sexual abuse requires a less stringent standard of
    consent. Under D.C. law, the misdemeanor charge applies to "whoever
    engages in a sexual act or sexual contact with another person and who
    should have knowledge or reason to know that the act was committed
    without that other person's permission." This crime can be punished with
    up to six months in prison.

    (from http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/09/legal-consent-morning-after-regret-and-accidental-rape/)


    Note: active resistance, active assertion of "no" on the part of the victim are not necessary for second-degree or misdemeanour conviction. Consent does not legally = explicitly saying yes, and lack of consent does not legally = either active resistance or explicitly saying "no." It IS rape if the "rapist is aware that the victim does not want to participate" "or is aware that their victim cannot consent."


    Can someone choose to have sex for reasons other than actually wanting to have sex with the other person? Of course. Prostitutes (of all genders) do it all the time, and I'm sure many other people do it as well, for numerous reasons. Does that therefore mean that unless someone explicitly resists or says no, but acquiesces, or does not actively resist, that person has not been raped? It absolutely does not.


    Nice hijacking of the thread, btw: what any of this really has to do with Sansa's situation is opaque. Sansa manifestly did not want to have sex with Ramsay. Ramsay manifestly knew this. The consequences for resistance or refusal were pretty clear--and pretty clearly a lot worse than those for not resisting. There is not a lot of room for ambiguity about the fact that Sansa WAS raped.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Can someone choose to have sex for reasons other than actually wanting
    to have sex with the other person? Of course. Prostitutes (of all
    genders) do it all the time, and I'm sure many other people do it as
    well, for numerous reasons.


    This is the crux of my whole point. Sansa could have agreed to have sex with Ramsay in an attempt to seduce him or fool him into thinking that he was winning her over. This level of deception isn't beyond her and had she done so, she would've maintained her agency and not been a victim of rape.



    However, on the show, Sansa was raped. Nothing ambiguous about that.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.