Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Final Adjusted TV Ratings for Monday 3rd February 2015


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Final Adjusted TV Ratings for Monday 3rd February 2015

3 Feb 2015

Share on Reddit


Remember you can view ALL Ratings and Charts for all shows/seasons in our Interactive TV Ratings Database.

NOTE: The Interactive table below allows you to sort the various columns. The table will be updated live as the ratings come in. Refresh for updates.


If you are new to ratings or still confused, we recommend you read this excellent Ratings FAQ.

Don't forget to follow our Ratings Only Twitter Account for the latest Ratings News

9 comments:

  1. Typical for Jane,Fosters.Too bad for Chasing Lfe.Im sick of people Wong about moving it,it wasn't benefiting from PLS leadin and was doing 0.4s behind it already and since it's high was 0.5,it was gonna hit 0.3s eventually especially since it was renewed Wheather or not it stayed behind a aging decling PLL or not.AbCfamily was clearly tired of trying and failing to find new hits post PLL

    ReplyDelete
  2. Eye Candy is getting better now. That's good. Still holding hope for this series.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sad for Chasing Life it deserves so much better. I really hope ABCFamily changes the schedule around. Great episode last night too. Show gets better every week.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Chasing Life did fine after PLL.. it pulled 0.5s every week except a couple 0.4s and its high was a 0.6 so it was fine where it was. The Fosters is a weak lead in.. and Chasing Life is suffering because of it. Cant spin it any other way.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I know you're the like the biggest Chasing Lufe fan but 0.4-0.5 out of a show normally getting 1.0 or better is not doing "fine"& is exactly why it was moved and they hoped it would do better after a more compatible leadin but it's not-can't spin it any other way.My statement & point still stand.Chasing Life would've gone to 0.3evtuslly behind PLL since PLL is decling and CL wasn't doing well there aleady anyway,

    ReplyDelete
  6. I am happy that the Originals did fairly good. Even though being a big fan of Daniel Gillies wish there was more of him and less Jackson this is turning to be the Haley and Jackson show- sorry cant stand that whole marriage storyline and it does not help that I am on the opposite ship.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Alright first off I'm not 5 so stop talking to me like I am. Second, I am not the "biggest chasing life fan" either. I am only saying that the fosters isn't strong enough to be a lead in, its in its 2nd season? And the ratings started to decline.. it started off really good they said it was a hit, then it dropped and it didn't take long. When Chasing Life was airing after PLL it pulled 9 0.5s, 2 0.4s and 0.6 out of 14 episodes. Sure I get it wasn't compatible with PLL and they idea was to move one family drama and pair it with another but the fosters isn't working with it either. CL was stable on tuesday night's.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Series high for Eye Candy.
    Chasing Life though....

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.