Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Allegiance - Surreptitious Entry - Advance Preview: "Another Solid Episode"


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Allegiance - Surreptitious Entry - Advance Preview: "Another Solid Episode"

19 Feb 2015

Share on Reddit

While Allegiance fans were tuning into the NBC freshman's second episode Thursday night, I was lucky enough to be tuning into the third episode, due to air this coming Thursday, at 10|9c.

Allegiance's first two episodes have been very solid, and "Surreptitious Entry" is no exception. It picks up seconds after Katya O'Connor dispatched a Russian sniper who had her son Alex in his sights. Simultaneously, Alex has his own challenges to deal with as he and colleague Michelle have to defend themselves and Vaso against the barrage of bullets destined for them.

This episode turns up the secret agent stuff a couple of notches more than what we've seen. The hour is built around the race between the SVR and and CIA as they seek the files the deceased Vostrov stole. Katya and husband Mark are compelled by Victor to represent the SVR in the hunt, while Alex makes their job rather difficult as he puts together a plan of attack for the CIA.

The hunt leads the teams to the Philadelphia City Hall, and the nearby Masonic Temple. Much of this sequence is shot on location which is fantastic to see. For a geek like me it's always interesting looking at Google Earth to see where the various characters walked, and where the cameras would have been positioned. Geeky things aside, the race is very well put together. Unlike other television series or movies which kit out their agents with ten thousand tools that work perfectly every time, in Allegiance, Katya and Mark have to improvise and overcome when they are confronted with various obstacles and inadequate resources. The CIA have their own set of challenges to face too - though the increased manpower and legal standing do give them an advantage.

Allegiance is getting it right when it comes to the humor and light-hearted moments. The showrunners have a knack for it, and Gavin Stenhouse excels in the portrayal of a socially awkward geek. Kenneth Choi once again provides some great entertainment in his humor-ridden role as Sam Luttrell.

Alex's sisters, Natalie and Sarah, have more substantial roles to play in this episode. The parents enlist Natalie to help them in the race for the files, and her relationship with Victor doesn't go unnoticed. The hour ends with a really good cliffhanger too.

In summary, this is another solid episode from Allegiance. I'm enjoying the humor and character interaction, and the story is well thought out and unfolding nicely.

Thanks for reading! Check out Allegiance on my TV ratings website, www.seriesmonitor.com/allegiance. Share your thoughts, theories and questions on the episode in the comments below.

Allegiance, "Surreptitious Entry", airs Thursday, February 19, 10|9c, on NBC.

About the Author - Jimmy Ryan
Jimmy Ryan lives in New Zealand, and works in the IT industry. He is an avid follower of drama television and has a keen interest for television ratings and statistics. Some of his favorite shows right now are Person of Interest, Scandal, House of Cards, Orphan Black, The Blacklist, The 100, How To Get Away With Murder, Elementary and Castle. You can visit his television ratings website, www.seriesmonitor.com or follow him on Twitter, @SeriesMonitor.
Recent Articles by Jimmy (All Articles by Jimmy)

10 comments:

  1. I felt that last week's episode felt short, in a good way. I honestly thought the show merely cut back to commercials before resuming for the episode's final act, but as it turns out, that WAS the final act.


    I think I may have a hard time letting this go if NBC decides to execute this show early on.

    ReplyDelete
  2. is there a victory in the episode? you don't have to say who but is there?

    ReplyDelete
  3. You'll be pleased (or maybe not) to hear that this week's episode has a similar sort of ending. And yeah, I'd like to see it run its course. It's better than many other freshman shows this season

    ReplyDelete
  4. a victory concerning the files

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ah, nearly. The cliffhanger at the end leaves that in jeopardy.

    ReplyDelete
  6. oof well that sounds intense and this show seems to like cliffhangers huh? LOL

    ReplyDelete
  7. My wife and I have been fans of "The Americans". I started to watch "Allegiance". So far, it's been really disappointing. I believe the body count in "The Americans" is unrealistically high, yet overall I'm pleased with the series. "Allegiance" takes the body count to a whole new level. Also, the first scene of "Allegiance" started with a gathering of SVR agents. Why would any clandestine agency gather so many agents together in one place? The whole idea is to have cells, and to keep those cells apart. Also, the casualness of the SVR in executing an agent who "didn't follow orders", those orders being countermanded, well, that's unrealistic also. Are SVR agents a dime a dozen? Whatever moral ambiguities are shown in "The Americans" are totally lacking in "Allegiance", which portrays everything as black and white. NBC I think didn't want to take a chance with this series the way FX took a chance in making KGB agents sympathetic, and with the audience (at least, most of the audience) rooting for Elizabeth and Philip whenever the FBI seems about to apprehend them. My preference would be a series with the pace of a John Le' Carre novel, but I suppose few viewers would tune in. I'll watch this series a little longer, but if I'm to stay with it, it has got to improve. Mainstream TV being mainstream TV, I doubt it will.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I wouldn't compare 'The Americans' with 'Allegiance'.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Sorry, but "solid" and "Allegiance" just do not come together. This show is just ridiculously bad.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.