Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon NCIS: Los Angeles - Episode 5.21 - "Three Hearts" Review - This was "The Talk?"


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

NCIS: Los Angeles - Episode 5.21 - "Three Hearts" Review - This was "The Talk?"

18 Apr 2014

Share on Reddit


“NCIS: Los Angeles” finally devoted an episode to exploring the budding relationship between Kensi and Deeks. But unfortunately, most of the journey of that exploration was hard to follow, felt forced and seemed untrue to the characters. It also left too much confusion and interpretation in the end as to what they had decided. Though I did enjoy a couple poignant ending scenes, overall it was much harder than it should have been to figure out what had happened between the characters and why.

After “NCIS: Los Angeles” writer Dave Kalstein promoted on Twitter that “Three Hearts” would be a “game-changer” for Kensi and Deeks, I was hoping for a lot more. I braced myself for the possibility that Kensi may not be ready to move forward with Deeks because she still needed time to heal. As much as I didn’t want that outcome, I knew it would at least make sense with the characters’ recent history. It’s very possible Kensi may still be struggling with guilt, doubt and fear after finding her ex-fiancé Jack again. (Although since returning to L.A. she really hasn’t shown any signs of that, which is a little odd in itself.) But when Deeks suddenly was the one who was afraid of moving forward, it felt strange.

Ever since he (somewhat) expressed his feelings, Deeks has been the one to push to move the relationship forward while Kensi was afraid of the repercussions. But in “Three Hearts,” the roles were reversed – for no apparent reason. Well, no apparent good reason, anyway.

Deeks starts doubting the relationship because of Paul Angelo, the undercover NCIS agent suspected of switching loyalties. As Deeks and Kensi interrogate the potentially rogue agent, the man’s arguments start to upset Deeks. But the problem is, those arguments were convoluted and made no sense. I found myself trying to figure out what they were even talking about half the time.

From the beginning, agent Angelo could see right through Kensi and Deeks. This in itself seemed implausible as they had hardly even said anything to him before he started analyzing their relationship. While the partners try to find out where Angelo’s loyalties lie, he explains that an old ranch hand taught him everything he needed to know about deep-cover operations. He says everyone has three hearts: the first you show only to strangers, the second you show only to your family and soul mate, and the third you never let anyone see because there’s too much truth and risk inside. This whole vague explanation that carried through the entire episode made no sense to me. It seemed by his explanation that the third heart was innately a negative situation. Angelo made it seem like if you ever let anyone see that third personal heart that holds secrets and truths and everything that you value and fear and love, you are doomed, no matter who it is. After all, he’d mentioned that the second heart was for a soul mate. So who could be worthy of your third heart? It seemed to me no one, which would make no sense because it would have no purpose.

During their conversation Angelo points out how much Kensi and Deeks care about each other. He needles Deeks by telling him that Kensi has seen his third heart and it isn’t going to end well. At one point Angelo says, “We’re all too close to this.” Turning to Deeks, he asks, “Have you ever seen the way she looks at you when you fidget with your hair?” To Kensi, he poses the question, “Have you ever seen how he gets stronger just by hearing the sound of your voice?” He implies things go bad when they get too personal – but to me it came across as hollow because he never talked about why getting personal is so bad. He never aimed his dialogue at a partner-type situation, which would have made more sense. Instead, he spoke all-inclusively. And in that case, I couldn’t see how any of the “accusations” he threw at them were bad.

Other things Angelo said made no sense, either, like how Deeks and Kensi were two people living in a world of their own creation and how cover stories strip you away layer by layer until nothing is left. That made sense in the context of being undercover but I couldn’t figure out how that was supposed to transfer to Deeks and Kensi.

By the time he got to the raccoon story, meanings were getting very hazy. Angelo says he had a raccoon that used to terrorize the house until they got rid of it. But soon another raccoon was back – the female. After listening to this dialogue several times, I believe he was trying to say that the female raccoon was going crazy without the male and putting herself in a dangerous situation all because they were mates for life. In essence, she couldn’t do anything else; that was her role and she may get killed for it. Though Kensi said raccoon mating for life was a myth, I believe his intention with the story was to show the negative consequences of them being mated for life, again trying to prove if you get too close to someone it just hurts you both in the end.

I wouldn’t have thought Deeks would buy into any of this. Deeks is usually very smart at seeing through people and none of Angelo’s arguments were very powerful. If there had been some kind of event or circumstance that happened during this operation that showcased how dangerous it was for Kensi and Deeks to be so close, I could understand. But in this case an angry and arrogant man simply rambled about things that made no sense and it rattled Deeks. This simply did not feel genuine to the character.

Nonetheless, Deeks expresses fear that he and Kensi could be too personal on the job and get burned. He says though they haven’t been burned yet, he could see it happening one day. When Kensi replies she wouldn’t let that happen to him, he retorts that she would be the reason it happened in the first place.

These back and forth matches of who is scared and who is defending their relationship are beginning to feel like a ping-pong match. First Kensi is scared of getting too close and what that will do to them, and now it’s Deeks’ turn. But without a genuine reason to make him feel like that, the ping-pong game is feeling a little fixed.

After all this, the end scene is the climax. And it was also hard to figure out. That is partly because it was left somewhat open-ended and partly because it was based on the earlier confusing dialogue. I watched the scene several times and got different things out of it each time.

One thing that I did like was that even with Deeks’ hesitation to getting personal, he still couldn’t resist flirting with Kensi. The whole conversation about the Wonder Woman sports bra and his Superman underwear was classic. Even with his reservations, he can’t resist being playful with her. This was also apparent in the earlier scene where they start talking about rock ‘n roll music. Their conversation wouldn’t have made sense to anyone else; but it makes sense to them because they speak each other's language.

When they finally get serious and have the “talk,” Deeks says he doesn’t know what to do with “their thing.” Kensi then asks him what his third heart tells him and he slowly, sadly gives her knife back. His third heart with all its inherent risks isn’t ready to make the leap. Kensi says okay and they are both clearly upset. It seems they are deciding they are not ready to take that chance, or at least Deeks isn’t. But then it gets confusing when he tells Kensi he actually believes that raccoons mate for life. Simply hearing that, it sounds positive – like he is offering her some hope that they could be meant to be together. But thinking back to the original context, Deeks would actually have been agreeing with agent Angelo that the raccoons stuck together simply because they were mates, not because it was good for them. As I watched the scene over again, this reality became clearer as I noticed the solemn expressions on their faces. Deeks feels terrible for what he is saying.

But there is still some hope that comes in my favorite scene of the box. Deeks has been waiting to open this box that Kensi gave him for a long time now. She previously told him it was something he’s always wanted. Despite that, he’s never opened it. In this solemn moment of realizing they may not be ready to move forward, Kensi gets out the box and uses her newly returned knife to open it. Deeks’ heartache is now mixed with anticipation as he eagerly wonders what’s inside. It was the perfect moment to open the box. After slicing it open, Kensi walks away with a smile on her face that gave me hope. She could have been smiling because she knew Deeks would appreciate the fun revelation. But I think it was more than that. To me it was a smile of satisfaction – a satisfaction in knowing that they weren’t done. They weren’t done with their friendship and they weren’t done exploring the layers of what else was to come.

That’s exactly what the box represented. As Deeks removes a sealed smaller cardboard box from the larger one (“touché,” he says), I couldn’t help but think of the layers of their relationship. They are still going through the needed outside layers to figure out what they want the inside to be. The box analogy was perfect. Even the tape on the outside box said “Fragile – Handle with Care.” Deeks still has something left to open – and something left to figure out relationship-wise. It just wasn’t time yet. That comparison to their relationship did leave hope. This was something that the two of them were both not ready to proceed with yet. But if they continue to handle it with care and unwrap every layer slowly, it’s hard to say what is at the center. Even Granger and Hetty had differing views. But Hetty had the last word when she said their relationship was not the beginning of the end, but the end of the beginning.

They are now moving to the next phase – the middle. The big question is: the middle of what? This could simply be the middle of a new revised friendship or it could be the middle of something more. I felt it was open for interpretation. I got the feeling that with their current fears, the relationship conversation would be tabled for a little while. But it will likely come back up again. For now the ping-pong ball has stopped. But it feels like the game isn’t over quite yet.


What did you think of "Three Hearts?" Do you agree with this interpretation of the ending or did you see things differently? What did you think of the box? What do you think is going to happen with Kensi and Deeks now? Let us know in the comments below.

About the Author - Tonya Papanikolas
Tonya Papanikolas is a freelance journalist who loves covering entertainment and television. She spent more than 10 years as a broadcast news journalist and now does everything from hosting to writing. She is excited to cover NCIS: Los Angeles for SpoilerTV. (She loves Kensi and Deeks!) She also writes SpoilerTV articles on other great shows.

39 comments:

  1. This was not a talk .You must see three hearts about 3 times for start feel again good but still.....having an acrid taste!Disappoint all week wait for a great episode and reunion and we take sadness!EXCELLENT REVIEW!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I didn't think the hearts analogy felt like it worked with Kensi and Deeks, but I agree with what he said about people having three (this is ttue for me). The rest of the analogies were hard to follow and it just made me get annoyed at the episode. Deeks was scared even before the relationship even hinted at starting - if you'll remember the scene in the armoury in the season 4 finale, Deeks looked terrified when Kensi told him to say what he actually meant (which he obviously did later on in the episode). And I was a little disappointed by the box opening. Kensi said it was the thing he wqnted most in the world (or words to that effect) and yet it was a box inside? I know there's probably something more inside that box but it felt like a let down. Good review Tonya.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jackie Jormpjomp18 April 2014 at 10:10

    The Kensi and Deeks stuff was unsatisfying. Hopefully it will be rectified. As for the rest, Angelo is a great character brought to life by an excellent performance. I want to see more. His sparring with Hetty was great.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Tonya Papanikolas18 April 2014 at 10:21

    You're right - this was not a talk! Acrid taste is a great description of what it left you with in the end. Ugh. The more I re-watched it, the more unsatisfied and angry I felt! I wanted a nice reunion, too; but no, like you said - just got sadness. Thanks for the nice comments on the review. I felt strongly about this one! Looks like you did, too. :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. It was one of the most boring episode of the series as the Angelo talk was nothing but random ramblings which will hardly affect anyone yet they affected Deeks so much

    ReplyDelete
  6. Tonya Papanikolas18 April 2014 at 10:30

    Interesting about the three hearts being true for you, Bradley. (I want to know more! Invasion of privacy but now I'm nosily curious. :) Ha ha.) I also was getting annoyed at the episode because the analogies were so hard to follow! My goodness. And you're right, Deeks was scared before. But he hasn't seemed to be lately. Do you disagree? (So to you did it not feel out of character for him to back away like this?) Also, I can totally see how you would be disappointed by the box opening. Yes, I too had thought Kensi had said the contents were what he wanted most in the world. (I couldn't find any notes to confirm that, though, so I wasn't positive. Glad you mentioned it so I know for sure.) So basically we got nothing out of it. (Which were my sentiments about the entire episode!) Yes, the more I think about it, the more I can see how the box would be a let down. Another teaser with no reveal. Ugh. Thanks, Bradley!

    ReplyDelete
  7. ;)
    I do think Deeks is the type to get easily scared, and dealing with someone who has been NCIS for so long and is intentionally trying to intimidate them, even the least scared people may end up doubting themselves. I saw it as a way for them to try to figure out what is going on between them. See here http://ncisredteam.com/ncis-los-angeles-4x18-red-part-one-recap-and-review/ about 3/4 the way down the page there is a paragraph about the box. I think it'll be about season 7 by the time we learn what is actually in the box.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Tonya Papanikolas18 April 2014 at 10:39

    Totally unsatisfying on the Kensi and Deeks stuff! It left me annoyed. But like you say, maybe they will rectify it. Who knows. As for Angelo, it is a good performance that can make you feel something, even negatively, for a character. And I thought Angelo was an arrogant, smarmy guy whom I wanted to yell at - proof of a good performance, I guess! Ha ha. ;) I actually didn't like his character, but mostly because I didn't think it was written very clearly. He confused me like the rest of the episode! But I'm glad to hear you really liked him. His sparring with Hetty was great! I didn't really understand why she let him go, though! That seemed odd to me. But maybe we will see more of him down the line. They definitely left it open...

    ReplyDelete
  9. Tonya Papanikolas18 April 2014 at 10:41

    Nicely put! That's exactly why I couldn't figure out why they affected him so much. Thanks for commenting!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Tonya Papanikolas18 April 2014 at 11:41

    It might be season 8 at this rate! We're never going to know what's in that box. ;)
    Yes, Deeks is definitely the type to get easily scared. But it felt to me like he had gotten past a lot of that. He had seemed so excited recently about Kensi. Thanks, though, for sharing your perspective on how easy it would be to get scared at hearing something like this from a longtime NCIS agent. I see your point. I guess I would agree more if the intimidation conversations had been more straight-forward. They would have been more effective that way. But because the analogies were so confusing the whole intimidation felt really weird and not very persuasive. Since the writers wanted to use this as a way for them to figure out what was going on with each other, I just wish they'd done it in a different way that didn't feel so forced and strange.
    Love debating the motivation behind these characters. Thanks, Bradley!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yeah, and I think it's because Deeks has wanted this for so long and is so excited about it that he got freaked out. He doesn't want anything to interfere/ruin him and Kensi. But I do agree they should have been more straight forward than telling us stories about racoons.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thank you for trying to make sense of a senseless episode. As you point out, the metaphors were often irrelevant, illogical or just laid on too thick. I don't mind that the ending leaves some room for interpretation as to what Densi's future holds, but at the very least any decisions they make should be based on valid reasons. We still don't know what if any resolution Kensi has come to regarding Jack, or if Deeks has revealed to her or anyone else the measures he resorted to in order to get information from the cleric in Spoils of War. Maybe that's yet to come, but deciding their future relationship based on the ramblings of an arrogant smarmy fool who doesn't even know them? Well, that's just ridiculous.
    I wonder if the writer was trying to create a Hetty-like character, very perceptive and mysteriously omniscient, even when he's never met the people he's talking to. If so, I think the writer failed. The best I can come up with for Angelo's supposed insight into their souls is that he knows Hetty, and understands that she would have chosen Deeks and Kensi to interview him for a reason, and then guessed what that reason was. I know, it's a stretch with nothing to support it, but it's the least nonsensical explanation I can come up with.

    ReplyDelete
  13. This episode was a bunch of phooey.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Elizabeth Harvey18 April 2014 at 19:55

    Meh, although I could not see a reason for it, there are plenty for Deeks to be afraid. He has had a partner/lover blown up, And he has seen how Kensis death affected him when he thought she was dead.
    It all seemed a little contrived. The box thing could go on for years. I for one, would like Kensi to be a little more forward if she is interested. I know it has been a while since she has done it, but all the digs about people would have to be desperate or stupid to be attracted to him, still leave a bad taste (yes I am holding a grudge) and taking his card away from any other female he gave it to. I am coming down off my Densi ship. They are great partners, and I don't want to see that end.
    I am still bothered by Hetty, she does not seem to have to answer to anyone for her actions. I am liking Granger more and more.
    Really enjoyed your review, thanks for putting this so well. Like this episode got us nowhere!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Great review! It's one of the best I've read about this episode. I was all sorts of heartsick after Three Hearts. It was a little less sad (yet more confusing) the second time around. I'm bummed at your take on the raccoons mating for life though. I want that to be a good omen for the future, damnit! If only I could control TV characters (or better yet—their writers) with my brain. Would that be too much to ask? See what you can do about that.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Tonya Papanikolas19 April 2014 at 06:35

    Thanks, Jaybird. It was hard trying to make sense of this one. I also wouldn't have minded if the ending was open to interpretation if they had just been based on valid reasons. You put it perfectly. I completely agree!
    Interesting thought on what the writer may have been trying to do with the Angelo character. I love that you tried to come up with "the least nonsensical explanation" you could find. Who knows? You may be right. Because we know there's no sensical explanation. So your reasoning sounds as good as (or better than!) any other. Thanks for helping me try to make sense of the senseless! I loved hearing your thoughts.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Tonya Papanikolas19 April 2014 at 06:36

    Phooey indeed! I'm in complete agreement.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Tonya Papanikolas19 April 2014 at 06:52

    You're right that Deeks has a lot of potential reasons to be afraid. I think if the writers had made us see the ones he's struggling with, things would have made more sense. But they didn't let us see any of that. It felt contrived to me, too. I know, who knows when we'll ever really see what's in the box.
    I can see how you would want Kensi to be more forward and stop making digs at Deeks. I don't blame you for holding a grudge. :) To me, they don't usually feel like put-downs but a playful way of joking with each other. But I wouldn't mind Kensi making a few moves, either. Bring it on!
    Yeah, good observation: Hetty does get to do whatever she wants, even letting a guy go who earlier was a feared threat to national security. But leave the decision up to Hetty; she knows everything. Ha ha. I'm interested to hear that you're starting to like Granger more. That's good since he's a series regular, which always baffles me. I feel like they never give him much to do so I still have not taken to him. He feels like a waste of a character to me. But I'd love to hear why you're starting to like him more. Interesting.
    Yes, maybe the bottom line was this episode got us nowhere. Maybe that's why it was so darn frustrating! Thank you SO much for your comments. I love reading them!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Tonya Papanikolas19 April 2014 at 07:01

    Thank you so much for your comments! I know exactly where you're coming from when you say it was less sad yet more confusing the second time around. Ha ha. The commiserating of Three Hearts! We all understand that sentiment, it seems. As for the raccoons, I can't even say I'm 100% sure of the analogy. But that made the most sense to me out of all the nonsensical options. I didn't want it to be true, either. No!! But when I finally realized I thought that's what it meant, it seemed to fit with their reactions. Who knows, though. I get more confused by the minute thinking about it. :) Oh my goodness. This episode! Yes, I agree - if only we could control the writers and characters with our brains! I don't think it's too much to ask. Maybe if we all try together... ;)

    ReplyDelete
  20. On second and third viewing of this episode, I think that whether it turns out to be nonsense or not depends on what happens next. Is the metaphor of the raccoons just a lot of Angelo's manipulative phooey, or does it foreshadow something bad happening to Deeks (the male raccoon) and Kensi (his mate) losing her mind over it? There is a lot of potential to explore how a long term undercover affects an agent's sense of self - will those questions be asked about any of our regular characters? So many threads this season have been left by the wayside to die an inglorious death, so I hope that is not the case here.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Tonya Papanikolas19 April 2014 at 21:25

    Hmmm, interesting. Yes, there could be potential to explore that and then this episode would make more sense. My guess is it's not foreshadowing. But let's see. If it happens, you totally called it!

    ReplyDelete
  22. Okay, just playing devil's advocate here...

    I'm not doubting your interpretation of the scene's dialogue if you're doing a word-for-word dissection. If we follow Angelo's metaphor exactly, the female raccoon represents Deeks, as he's the one who so desperately sought out his "mate" in Afghanistan and would do anything to save her, even if it was destructive to himself and others. That said, I think the essence of "mates for life" is what the writer (Kalstein) was getting at in the final scene.

    Let's face it—Angelo's use of the metaphor was flimsy at best, and while I do think it served to illustrate to Deeks why he should use caution, ultimately I believe Deeks was responding directly to Kensi's statement about the "myth" of mating for life. It was classic Densi: Kensi with her facts/cynicism/smarty-pants style and Deeks with his heart on his sleeve (even though that's what he's trying to protect). Wow, now that I think about it, that's pretty freakin' sweet!

    The thing that keeps getting to me though is how can Deeks (and the writers) think his response to seeing Kensi in danger would be any different if they were in a romantic relationship? I mean, he loves her whether or not they're acting on it. Am I missing the point here? Things got a little hazy for me there in the boatshed.

    Bottom line: Deeks believes in mating for life, and I certainly hope it's his way of telling Kensi he needs time but still sees them being together for the long haul. (I know I do!)

    Now all we have to do is find a way for Talia to meet an unfortunate end. (I hear she's making another appearance soon.) Might I suggest she have a run-in with a rabid woodland creature? Like, say, a raccoon...?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Tonya Papanikolas20 April 2014 at 10:43

    You play a very good devil's advocate! Your arguments are quite convincing. They reeled me in. :) I definitely think it's possible that Kalstein could have simply been using the essence of "mates for life" and that Deeks may just have been responding directly to Kensi's statement about the "myth" of mating for life. Hmm. I hadn't thought of it as him responding directly to just that one part of Kensi's statement. I think that's possible. If it's true, I could still see his reaction being sad and upset because even if he was saying he believed in mates for life, he wasn't doing anything to move forward toward that, in essence still showing he wasn't ready yet. So he would have been sad. But that about-face still doesn't really make sense to me in terms of his character. Nonetheless, that doesn't mean it isn't what was intended. So I believe it is a possibility.

    (I hadn't even thought of Deeks seeking out his mate in Afghanistan as going with the raccoon analogy, by the way. That's good. I'm not sure if that was intended or not, but it works with the metaphor. Well, you're right - up until the point you mentioned. Boatshed haziness is a "Three Hearts" syndrome. Lol.)

    I am starting to think more and more that it's impossible for us to figure out what he meant because it was written so poorly that none of his intentions come through clearly.

    But I do see your bottom line. Yes, Deeks believes in mating for life. Whether he does anything about it or not, that's a hopeful sign. I like that point. Yes! In fact, no matter what the raccoon story meant, I think that's true. Their feelings are still the same. They just have to get over their reservations about being together. And with time, there's hope! (I still see it happening, too. I just hope they don't do this push and pull and push and pull forever. That ruins things!)

    Oh, thanks for the heads up about Talia, by the way. I totally forgot about her. Ugh. Yes, I like your idea about the raccoon! Ha ha ha. Now we have a valid reason to like the raccoon. :)
    You're awesome!

    ReplyDelete
  24. Totally! Of course he's sad—he's probably kicking himself, even though he did what he thought he had to do. Poor guy. Now, what was going on with him as Kensi's walking over to get the box? It almost looks like he's yawning, but I know that can't be right. I assume he's freaking out over what just happened—maybe even regretting it? It's kind of like the deep breath he took at the restaurant at the end of "Recovery," except that time I was much happier about it. (And let's face it, this is all about my happiness.)

    Clearly, I've spent far too much time thinking about this episode. What can I say? It just seems critical that these two gorgeous creatures hook up. The universe requires it.

    So, speaking of hooking up, what's your opinion on the "did they or didn't they" question at the end of "Recovery?" I was surprised to discover this was even in question! Apparently a lot of people think they didn't. How is that even possible? Am I crazy? Then again, if they did, HOW could they not want to do it again??? Cray.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Tonya Papanikolas22 April 2014 at 01:43

    Gwen, I love that you have me thinking so much about all this, too! I have gone back and watched the ending scenes over about 5 times and really think your interpretation of what Deeks meant about the raccoon may be right. Because Kensi gives a little mini-smile like she is surprised that he thinks people mate for life and likes it. I still am not 100% sure but watching it from this perspective made me a lot happier!!! Seriously. :) So I am going to choose to think of it that way.
    I love the expression/reaction you mentioned that he makes as Kensi is walking over to get the box. Yes, I think he's taking a deep breath (yeah, kind of like in the end of "Recovery!"). It's like this conversation is really tough and intense for him and while Kensi is walking away, he has to take a breath and recover (especially because he feels bad that he's essentially saying he's not ready yet). It's more of Deeks wearing his heart on his sleeve like you mentioned earlier. Yes, I think he is freaking out and regretting HAVING to say it. (I don't think he'd take it back but he hates saying it.) The more I think of all of this, it gives me hope for them. His feelings are in one place and his head is in another. And his head just has to be overcome! It's just another glitch on their road. I totally laughed out loud when you said, "It just seems critical that these two gorgeous creatures hook up The universe requires it." I agree!! I want it to happen - NOW! Ha ha. But good things come to those who wait. :)
    I'm glad you asked about the "did they or didn't they" question. I totally agree. How can that even be a question???!!! I don't understand that at all. I once read something that a viewer had posted implying it hadn't happened and I thought, "WHAT? Are you crazy?" I didn't realize there were a lot of people who thought that way, though. Insane! I really don't see how they could think that. It was pretty clear to me what they were leaving to do. Sure, they didn't show it, so technically they could have changed their minds. But it was clear what was about to happen. And then it still seemed clear to me in the awkwardness at work as they eagerly (yet nervously) want to see each other before Kensi is sent away. I am sticking to my story on this one!! It happened. :)

    ReplyDelete
  26. Tonya Papanikolas23 April 2014 at 00:35

    Ha ha ha. Oh my gosh, that picture is AWESOME! Lol. I love it! Nice job! Yes, I am the official NCISLA reviewer for SpoilerTV. Great job, huh? I review every episode. But I just started with SpoilerTV a month ago so I have reviewed four episodes so far. I started with "Windfall," I believe (episode 18). You'll have to come back now and keep chatting after the episodes! Yes, much cheaper than therapy. Ha ha. (I try to post the reviews by Wednesday night unless I'm having a really busy week.)

    I'm curious, too, if producers read fan sites. I don't know for sure but somebody has to keep a pulse on what fans like and don't like, right? Because I'm sure it makes a difference for ratings. It would be interesting to know how much pull the Densi army does have, wouldn't it?
    Well, glad that it's Tuesday so we have another episode to watch tonight! Hope to chat more very soon!!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Tonya Papanikolas23 April 2014 at 00:38

    Oh shoot. Just realized tonight is a re-run. Bummer. :(

    ReplyDelete
  28. At least it was a good rerun--although now it makes me really sad, considering what happened at the end of Three Hearts. :(

    On a lighter note, did you see the preview for next week's ep? I believe Densi fans are now being treated like the begging mutts we are:

    Writers: "Well, what're we going to give the Densimals this week? Oh, here's an idea-- What if Deeks jumps on top of Kensi in the least sexual way possible?"


    Producers: "Brilliant! Those fools will discuss/debate that for another week."


    Fans: "Squeeee!!!"


    We're pathetic. (Okay, maybe just me.)

    In other news, I see that you're of Greek descent. Have you lived there? My husband and I got married on Santorini, then traveled to Mykonos and Crete. Totally in LOVE with Greece! (and Marty Deeks)

    ReplyDelete
  29. ...oh... and my husband. (oops!)

    ReplyDelete
  30. Okay, I've been living a lie. My username, Gwen, was an alias. Unlike Max Gentry, however, Gwen is just a boring version of myself because I'm embarrassed to be a fangirl. That said, I was starting to feel schizophrenic, so here I am. Ilene the fangirl. (I promise this isn't another lie! I'm even on the internets!) Twitter: @ileenieweenie Sorry for fibbing. :-/

    ReplyDelete
  31. Catarina Godinho23 April 2014 at 23:07

    I think when kensi opened the box, she opened her heart to him. In the box is written "fragile - handle with care" because her heart is fragile and need someone to care.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Tonya Papanikolas24 April 2014 at 05:52

    Ha ha. It craps me up that what you picked out of the preview for next week's ep was "Deeks jumps on top of Kensi in the least sexual way possible." Lol. That's hilarious! It looks like he had to protect her by jumping on top of her. Seems normal to me, right? ;)
    And yes, I am of Greek descent but I've never lived there. I'm jealous you guys got married in Santorini and then traveled to Mykonos and Crete. That's awesome!!! I have family from Crete. Oh, so jealous. Why did you choose to get married there? (Great decision!)

    ReplyDelete
  33. Tonya Papanikolas24 April 2014 at 05:53

    lol. Of course. You can love Marty Deeks and your husband, too! :)

    ReplyDelete
  34. Tonya Papanikolas24 April 2014 at 05:55

    Ilene, yay! Don't be embarrassed to be a fangirl. Fangirls are awesome!!! I'm one, too. :) No apologies necessary. Fangirls have to stick together. :)

    ReplyDelete
  35. Tonya Papanikolas24 April 2014 at 05:57

    I love that!!! It makes so much sense. Nice analogy. Can't wait for Deeks to start caring for her fragile heart. :) It's nice to see Kensi open up a little bit.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Heh - Yeah, but I'm a little old for this silliness. Maybe I just need a new title: Fanwoman? Fanlady? Fanopausal fancrone?

    So Mr. Ilene and I decided on Greece for two reasons: 1) We'd never been there. 2) Both our families are crazy. **BEST. DECISION. EVER.** It was just the two of us, and it was AWESOME. :) We told our friends and family what we were doing in advance, so I don't know that it technically counts as eloping. Regardless, I highly recommend it (marriage optional).

    And of course the part I picked out was Deeks saving Kensi. That's why I watch the show! I get to pretend to be pretty Kensi while sitting on my couch eating potato chips in my ratty, man-repelling bathrobe. It's great - and I don't even have to go to the gym to keep up her lovely figure! #fancroneftw

    ReplyDelete
  37. Tonya Papanikolas25 April 2014 at 09:09

    Lol. Fanwoman is just as a good as fangirl. You're never too old for a little fun! That's the beauty of TV. We get to insert ourselves in these characters' lives as if we are them! (Speaking of that, man, does Daniela Ruah have an amazing figure! If only we could really look like her while eating potato chips, wearing our bathrobes and not going to the gym! Ha ha.) Greece sounds like an awesome wedding decision!!!

    ReplyDelete
  38. I like your review and how you analyzed it all till the last detail. But I think the episode was shallow and yes, a little bit fake. The analogy between Kenzi and Deeks relationship (that hasn't even started by the way) and what Angelo said all along is completely missing the point, in my personal opinion. That guy was giving some not so related examples and myths for a screwed up relationship that he had undecorver with some guy's wife So, what is the similarity if you ask me? I mean after all those season s constructing the "thing" between my favorite characters,and after the last episodes with so much depth and emotion, now Deekes is changing is mind after some stupid remarks somebody made in the interrogation room? It's just not like the normal characters and usually episodes I have got used to. And all those "beginning of the end" and "end of the beginning" meant the same stupid thing, if you ask me because actually nothing has happened and after the last episode it looks like nothing is going to happen. Personally I think the writters have screwed things up with this last episode. I mean I didn't expect the two pf them to be holding hands right now but honestly the last episode was a disappointment for me. Sorry for ruing your mood because your review was actually too perfect taking into consideration the episode:)

    ReplyDelete
  39. Tonya Papanikolas28 April 2014 at 07:33

    I agree with you! You didn't ruin my mood because I agree with everything you said. I agree that the episode was shallow and somewhat fake and that the analogy between the Kensi and Deeks relationship and what Angelo said missed the point and didn't work. And that it was stupid for Deeks to change his mind after the depth and emotion we've seen recently to suddenly he's listening to stupid remarks someone made in the interrogation room! It was maddening! They acted like something was going to happen and then nothing did. Annoying! I thought the writers screwed up, too, with this episode! Thanks for your comments on the review. It was hard to find some good in it because it made me so annoyed. I'm glad you posted your comments. It's kind of therapeutic to write about how disappointing it was! Right? :)

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.