Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Revenge - Episode 3.18 - Blood - Press Release


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Revenge - Episode 3.18 - Blood - Press Release

22 Mar 2014

Share on Reddit
EMILY HELPS AIDEN FACE HIS DEMONS AS VICTORIA SEEKS OUT
A FAMILIAR FACE, ON ABC’S “REVENGE”

Guest Star Roger Bart Returns as Mason Treadwell

“Blood” – Investigations into Pascal lead Emily and Aiden to uncover some long buried family secrets, while Victoria pays a surprise visit to former ally Mason Treadwell as she gets ever closer to exposing Emily, on “Revenge,” SUNDAY, APRIL 6 (10:01-11:00 p.m., ET), on the ABC Television Network.

“Revenge” stars Emily VanCamp as Emily Thorne, Madeleine Stowe as Victoria Grayson, Henry Czerny as Conrad Grayson, Josh Bowman as Daniel Grayson, Nick Wechsler as Jack Porter, Gabriel Mann as Nolan Ross, Christa B. Allen as Charlotte Clarke and Barry Sloane as Aiden Mathis.

Guest cast TBD.

“Blood” was written by Karin Gist and directed by Wendey Stanzler.
Source:

12 comments:

  1. Mason Treadwell!!!! Was wondering if we would ever see him again.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Interesting title. Revenge usually goes for abstract nouns that aren't tangible but I'm even more intrigued by the title of the season finale (Execution).

    ReplyDelete
  3. I wonder what he's gonna tell Victoria about Emily's true identity. I know they made a deal that he wouldn't rat her out so im sure he will tell her something else.

    Pascal really? What's so interesting here, his daughter is so boring. Obviously he knew Victoria, maybe they met in France after she gave up Patrick and had a love affair but *yawn.* Even Conrad would find that storyline boring. Maybe she almost married him over Conrad?

    ReplyDelete
  4. This sounds juicy! :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well, good for you. In my mind she's a refreshingly straightforward character in this show full of lying, cheating, a-moral douchebags and if that's 'boring' then so be it I guess. But they're clearly trying to give her something more 'substantial' to do in future episodes (by introducing her father and possibly trying to tie them to the central plotline) and yet STILL people bitch about it before they've even SEEN the storyline (or even been introduced to Pascal) to judge properly. She can't win and it's just tiring to read. She doesn't get given much to do other than be Jack's girlfriend and it's bitch, bitch, bitch she's boring blah blah blah and then the writers TRY to give her more to do and it's still bitch, bitch, bitch what she's boring why are they giving her a plotline blah blah blah. Whatever.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'll guess we'll have to agree to disagree. The show hasn't really done a good job at introducing new characters this season and the last thing Revenge needs is yet another new character. It already is crowded as is.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well said. I'm sick of fans giving Margaux crap for no reason. I find her character refreshing and I look forward to seeing her role become more of a pivotal one next season.

    ReplyDelete
  8. http://eonline.com/news/523241/spoiler-chat-scoop-on-revenge-reign-sleepy-hollow-and-more

    ReplyDelete
  9. How do you know the title of the season finale ?

    ReplyDelete
  10. 'The show hasn't really done a good job at introducing new characters this season'


    Now that we CAN agree on, which is what makes it especially frustrating for me. I believe that Margaux has the potential to be a really good addition to the show but the writers have completely squandered it so far by sticking her in a hasty relationship with Jack and making her float around in the background having occasional scenes with different characters (Victoria, Conrad, Daniel, e.t.c) that never really go anywhere.Having seen the actress Karine Vanasse in other projects (including ABC's failed series 'Pan Am') I know what an incredible actress she is and what she's capable of and I can't even express how annoying it is to see such a talented performer be completely wasted. That's why I'm excited to see that she's finally (with any luck) going to be given a storyline other than being an obstacle in the tired Jack/Emily saga, but time will tell how the show will actually deal with it, so we'll see I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I agree with Erica, right now Margaux is a boring character. Maybe she'll grow on me once the show gives her something substantial to do but right now, I couldn't care less about her, her relationship with Jack, her father and her magazine.

    ReplyDelete
  12. 'What's so interesting here, his daughter is so boring.'

    Maybe to you but not to everyone, I love Margaux and so do lots of other viewers of the show. Just because she's actually a decent human being, it doesn't mean she's 'boring'. They clearly haven't even properly started to go into her true purpose on the show yet anyway so why not give her a chance? Pascal LeMarchal was an 'investor' in Grayson Global apparently so there's every chance he could also have been involved in the downing of the flight which would tie him, and Margaux by extension, into the central plotline, They must have larger plans for the character of Margaux or they wouldn't have bothered promoting her to series regular.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.