Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Revolution 2.05 "One Riot, One Ranger" Review": The Calvary Arrives


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Revolution 2.05 "One Riot, One Ranger" Review": The Calvary Arrives

27 Oct 2013

Share on Reddit
  
      This week’s episode of Revolution, “One Riot, One Ranger,” was directed by Frederick E. O. Toye and written by David Rambo and Ben Edlund. Toye and Rambo are familiar names and collaborated on season one’s penultimate episode “Children of Men.” Edlund should be a familiar name to fans who followed Eric Kripke from Supernatural as Edlund wrote some of the best episodes on that show. I watch (and review) both shows, so I was torn to see Edlund leaving Supernatural, but I’m also a fan of his, so I was glad to see him join one of the other shows I love, and I’m really excited to see what he’s going to do on Revolution. I’m sure I’ve already detected some of his distinctive style in the dialogue...

    This episode advances a lot of the storylines and brings some of our characters back together. I really enjoyed the dialogue, acting, and action this week. The best running gag this week had to be all the Butch and Sundance references – and I attribute this to Kripke and Edlund being back in the same room. Miles (Billy Burke) protesting that he and Monroe (David Lyons) weren’t Butch and Sundance, just highlighted how much they were. “Who are these guys?” is a direct reference to the movie too and is a running gag in it. The fact that they are such a team was highlighted by their referencing tactics with just town names – eg Ann Arbor. Bonus? How pissed off it made Charlie (Tracy Spiridakos)! I loved her line – “You’re just saying towns!” But Miles and Monroe knew exactly what the other one was going to do.

    I’m really happy to see David Lyons getting a more central storyline this season. It’s almost heartbreaking that he’s like an eager puppy wanting to be accepted back by Miles. Miles tells Monroe that he’s a black pit that he spent years crawling out of. I suspect that Miles may be putting more blame on Monroe than Monroe actually deserves out of a sense of his own guilt. On the other hand, so far this season, Monroe seems to be a changed man. He doesn’t seem quite so paranoid or vindictive. While I’m happy for the change, is it believable? I may be predisposed to simply let that inconsistency go because I like the character so much, but is it realistic that wanting revenge for what was done to Philadelphia – his city – is providing enough incentive for Miles to be such a changed man? However, as he shows by shooting John Franklin Fry (Jim Beaver), he is still definitely a bit of a loose cannon.

    Is Fry dead? I thought so at first, but on reflection, I’m not sure. I sure hope not because Jim Beaver is a fantastic addition to the cast! They don’t actually say that he’s dead, and it will be a lot more difficult to arrive to see the General with Fry’s corpse than a Fry that they have “saved.” I loved Beaver’s entrance as he announces that he’s “John Franklin Fry, Secretary of the Interior of the great nation of Texas, and you’ve brought an armed force on our sovereign soil,” after scoffing at Truman’s (Steven Culp) announcing they are the US government. Fry has little use for Truman but says he’ll talk to the General. Truman calls Fry a “dick” (Edlund alert!). Miles has a more fruitful conversation with Fry even though he had tried to kill Fry in the past when he was a part of the Monroe Republic. They both realize that Truman and his army are not the “good neighbours” they are purporting to be.

    Charlie has a sweet reunion with both Miles and Aaron (Zac Orth) who are both happy and relieved to see her. Rachel (Elizabeth Mitchell) is too distracted by Monroe’s presence and Charlie’s part in bringing him with her to be happy to see her daughter. In fact, she once again exhibits no maternal instincts whatsoever. Charlie tries to explain to her mother that she had wanted to shoot Monroe at first too. Instead of listening to Charlie’s explanation she cuts her off and says, “and you trusted him because he’s a saint? Are you really that stupid?” To which Charlie replies, “For coming back here? Yeah, think I am.” And I couldn’t blame Charlie. After all, Charlie came back to save her mother – again – and – again – gets no thanks from her mother. I really disliked Rachel again by the end of the episode. It made sense that she would be angry at Monroe – he did hold her captive, torture her, and kill her son – but that’s no excuse for being cruel to Charlie.

    I loved Aaron’s response to seeing Monroe – “So... Monroe. That’s quite a twist.” Once again in this episode Orth has quite a bit to do and delivers another terrific performance. In the present, he is being torn up over his connection with the nanites. He goes to Miles and Rachel and tells them about his vision, confirming with Miles that it actually happened. Rachel wants to deny that it’s possible because the nanites would have to have been networking and they aren’t remotely designed to do what they did. Miles wants them to “dial back the crazy,” but the evidence seems clear. In flashback, we also see Aaron meeting Cynthia (Jessica Collins) when he has a job interview for the teaching position with her. She wants to turn him down, even though he’s insanely qualified, because he smells of liquor (a non-starter) and has “a sad, unmarried uncle thing.” It’s clear in the flashback that Cynthia is actually a pretty astute judge of character, with the exception, perhaps, of her husband Carl who is clearly a bully and a cheat. In the junkyard after finding Carl cheating and being threatened by him, as Aaron walks away, his fist clenched in anger, you can clearly see the lantern in the front window and a fire pop up in the back seat as Aaron causes Carl to burst into flames. In the present, Aaron confesses to Rachel that he’s running away because he’s afraid that he will hurt Cynthia because he can’t control the nanotech and he is being consumed with guilt over the people he’s killed. Rachel assures him they’ll figure it out and convinces him to come back to Cynthia; it’s while on their way back that he has the vision that leads them to the Mill at the time of the rendezvous with Fry.

    Rachel has a point that so far, the nanotech really hasn’t killed anyone who wasn’t a threat – and really it’s been people who threaten those Aaron cares about. It was interesting when Rachel ran into Cynthia that she asked her if she’d seen “Miles.” Doesn’t Cynthia think his name is Stu like the rest of the town? Even if Aaron had told her that along with everything else, there was no way for Rachel to know that... perhaps a bit of a minor gaff in the episode.

    Meanwhile, Tom (Giancarlo Esposito) thinks he’s made some real headway when Allenford (Nicole Ari Parker) tells him she’s taking him to the capitol with her. However, they are ambushed, and Tom finds out that she’s no longer in the administration’s good graces because she wrote a letter protesting the new reprogramming camps. It was positively chilling watching Esposito go from caring and helpful to just abandoning Allenford to her fate when he realized she could no longer help him achieve his goals. He tells her that he doesn’t want to be a fugitive, he wants to be a Patriot. She manages to secure his help when she informs him that Jason (JD Pardo) is at one of the camps. He forces her to promise to take him there. It was nice to see Tom actually put his son first for a change.

    I found this a very satisfying episode. Burke should be singled out for a great performance here. We see him tender with Rachel, at his best strategically with Fry, torn over having to work with Monroe (he’s clearly finding it easy to get back into a rhythm with his old friend), tender with Charlie in a different way, and exasperated over the behavior of the group. It really felt to me like Burke was having a blast filming the episode. The fight scene between Monroe, Miles and the Patriots was fantastic – clearly demonstrating as I’ve said, how in sync the two are and demonstrating why they survived going to war both before and after the blackout.

    What did you think of the episode? Is it plausible for Monroe to join Miles’ group? Do you think Fry is dead? Let me know your thoughts in the comments below! Just a quick note as well that my review will be delayed next week.

18 comments:

  1. Another Great Review, Lisa!

    I think the Anne Arbor reference might also be relevant to LOST fans, as this is where DHARMA Headquarters resides...

    "Rachel has a point that so far, the nanotech really hasn’t killed anyone who wasn’t a threat – and really it’s been people who threaten those Aaron cares about. It was interesting when Rachel ran into Cynthia that she asked her if she’d seen “Miles.” Doesn’t Cynthia think his name is Stu like the rest of the town? Even if Aaron had told her that along with everything else, there was no way for Rachel to know that... perhaps a bit of a minor gaff in the episode."

    Good catch with Cynthia! Hard to say which way it is, but I suspect that she knows a lot...As for Aaron and the nanite protection squad, it does seem to have only hurt [mostly] bad people, because I think Carl was just an all out bad person and not just a cheater, but at the same time, I can't imagine that there won't be a stipulation. I hope the nanite tech some how ties in with Monroe during the next episode, given the title: 'Dead Man Walking" !!

    I keep thinking it would be fun to see a "re-programmed" Jason, but I have this feeling that Allenford lied to Tom to save her own skin! As much as I like Julia, I really like this pairing with Neville and Allenford better, but it's probably a sign that Allenford may not be in it for the long haul :D

    "It made sense that she would be angry at Monroe – he did hold her captive, torture her, and kill her son – but that’s no excuse for being cruel to Charlie."



    To be fair, Charlie did just get up and leave Rachel at a rather bad time (and she did set out to do what I think Rachel would have liked to do herself). It's not to say that perhaps Rachel didn't deserve it for leaving her and Danny at such a young age, but since she and the viewers still really don't fully understand the deal behind that, I think it's hard to judge Rachel for that, but ultimately I think Charlie has been written to be a little more like Rachel in the sense that she's going to do what she's going to do.


    Another facet is the way they wrote Monroe and Charlie together. I know it's the expectation and probably the likely choice to still go with 'Miles being Charlie's real dad' line of thought, but she and Monroe do have commonalities too ( They both have those large piercing blue eyes and high cheekbones, he's the only one that calls her "Charlotte", and he keeps saving her life), especially now with the choice to have Charlie be written in contrast to Monroe and have her be the one to bring him back into the fold this season...Maybe it's a ruse, but I feel like they're toying with us on this XD




    To your questions posed:


    It would be neat if Fry was not dead, but I'm not sure what purpose it would serve? I think Monroe still might be able to join Miles group, but I think if it's Monroe that dies and gets Resurrected, he basically would force himself to join them, since he apparently can't die (and thus we play with "fate" and "purpose" in this universe again)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really think the dead man walking is going to be Fry. I actually don't think he's probably alive - though I adore Jim Beaver and want more than the little we got to see him do here. I think it will be dead man walking in the sense that the group is walking the dead man back to Austin to the General.
    I just can't like Rachel. I love Mitchell as an actor (and loved her on Lost - and rooted for her and Sawyer), but I just can't like Rachel. Maybe I just need to know more about what happened for all the years she was gone...
    I really like the dynamic between Charlie and Monroe - and I've made no secret of the fact that I've loved Lyons from the beginning.
    I'd forgotten the link to Ann Arbor in Lost! I've spent a fair bit of time there, so it did resonate with me at the time too!
    I agree about the chemistry between Allenford and Tom! Would love to see more of them together - maybe they will form an alliance somehow? I'm betting Jason is totally drugged up... maybe this is the turn his character is getting this season that we were promised?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good review. Totally agreed about Neville's chilling transformation the moment he thought Allenford was no more use to him. I think I might have actually muttered, "wow, that's cold!" at the time.
    Also agreed that the show is making it difficult to get on side with Rachel--maybe because there's stuff we don't know yet, but more luikely, it seems to me either an inability in the writers' room to figure out how to do plausible women, or the all-too-common desire on many shows to amp up the angst and character tension at the expense of sensible behaviour.And yes, I know that people often don't act rationally in the real world, either, but Rachel's whipsawing over her kids--they're the mos timportant thing in the world, they can be abandoned for years, whoops they're important again, uh-oh time to demean and push them away again--makes her a tad hard to understand, which of course makes her difficult to identify with or like.
    Also agreed that, nice as it is to see more David Lyons, the jury is definitely out on whether Monroe can plausibly be redeemed--without reconning him, anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Monroe as Charlie's father? Hmm. Interesting possibility.

    ReplyDelete
  5. WHOA! Holy crap! JUST saw the scenes for next week! How exactly are they going to get there from the end of this week??!! I like the idea of Monore redeeming himself by surrendering to save the others - dying - and coming back with a clean slate. If Dr Gene is the one who gets to kill him, the jury is totally out on whether he might give him something that only mimics death or whether he's really a sleeper and won't help the resistance. In other news - I KNEW the patriots knew where Rachel was and that was important!

    ReplyDelete
  6. The nanotech didn't kill her, she just couldn't get out of the car... and really? She was guilty too... Harsh, I know...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Great review. I can understand why people are a bit upset with Rachel this season. It's great to have Miles + Monroe back together again. I'm loving the Aaron storyline & the mystery of it. Hope Neville finds Jason soon!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm having a major bran fart wondering if the word should be "Cavalry" instead of "Calvary"

    ReplyDelete
  9. Calvary = Site of the Crucifixion outside Jerusalem
    Cavalry = soldiers or warriors who fought mounted on horseback
    :)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Whoops. Clearly I shouldn't write anything when I've only slept for about 5 hours in the last 72... But both work if you squint, right?

    ReplyDelete
  11. LOL! I was leaning towards that specifically because of next week's promo, but was trying not to spoiler you!!! XD

    I'm thinking the Patriots probably want her for a technology related reason, otherwise I think they would have just killed her already...

    ReplyDelete
  12. It's probably a ruse, but there have been a couple of times where it has crossed my mind. I first time was when they first meet. (My memory is a little fuzzy on this, but I think it was "Nobody's Fault But Mine')

    ReplyDelete
  13. "...but Rachel's whipsawing over her kids--they're the most important thing in the world, they can be abandoned for years, whoops they're important again, uh-oh time to demean and push them away again--makes her a tad hard to understand, which of course makes her difficult to identify with or like."



    Although I generally agree with this, I still think Charlie holds her to unfair standards as well, but I do think there needs to be some kind of turn over soon, which is what I'm hoping for after next week's episode.


    I also agree that it's hard to know if the nanotech is only hurting extremely bad people or if it gets directed towards anyone who Aaron gets enraged with, as I agree it's unclear just how bad "what's her face" was and if like with POI if these network of machines can label and segregate?...I feel pretty certain that there is going to be some kind of stipulation with Aaron and this tech, especially considering just how worried he is about it, let alone if it turns out he's not the only one who's in touch with it!!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Well considering what's about to happen next week, I think Calvary works just fine :P

    ReplyDelete
  15. It's called a typo, folks. These things happne.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Agree with everything you say!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Also, "The Calvary arrives" would make for an awesomely ominous title!

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.