Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Revolution - Season 2 - Key Art Banner
Sign Up


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Get In Touch
 Join SpoilerTV
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Revolution - Season 2 - Key Art Banner

14 Sept 2013

Share on Reddit
-
Sign Up for the SpoilerTV Newsletter where we talk all things TV!

8 comments:

  1. DarthLocke414 September 2013 at 23:46

    Love this key art banner/poster!!! Hope it will be the DVD/Blu-ray cover art!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dahne15 September 2013 at 00:24

    I really like the nanite power symbol. The rest is meh.

    ReplyDelete
  3. lsbloom15 September 2013 at 02:07

    My hope that they will kill off Elizabeth Mitchell just keeps dimming. :-(


    What is going on above Aaron's head?


    PS. Too much photoshop.

    ReplyDelete
  4. CGS15 September 2013 at 03:12

    Elizabeth Mitchell is the only good thing about this show. So I'm with you, hopefully she gets killed off so she gets a show worthy of her.

    ReplyDelete
  5. DarthLocke415 September 2013 at 14:43

    The second season both story and mythos sounds and looks SO much better than the first season, that I think we could be very surprised by it. Plus I think it's integral to the story that Miles and Rachel's redemption arcs play out together and we come to understand their relationship better, especially if Charlie is Miles daughter...this is their second chance to be a more honest family and to protect the nation instead of destroying it.


    The cast they have is a good cast. They just needed to up the production values, get more additional cast to keep things moving a little more, and work out their execution problems and everything I've seen and read so far seems to point in that direction.

    ReplyDelete
  6. DarthLocke415 September 2013 at 18:32

    But I think if your writing a long term character, one that you introduce to the series as being dead, then you have to spread her story out over the course of series...I mean Alias didn't have many flashbacks and we didn't know Irina was alive until the very end of season one, as she was introduced as "The Man".


    It makes sense to me that her character is not meant to be clear, because that is how we establish a kind of enigmatic quality to her. Do we trust her? Do we like her? Do we think she's trying her best? Do we know why she did these things -those are questions that the series needs to answer over time, since for Charlie especially, it's the relationship that is much needed, but most severed. Given Rachel's father is featured (and that it seems to be blend of 3 J.J. Abrams characters: Dr. Brian Porter-Felicity, Walter Bishop (cow named Gene references to "genetics") -Fringe, and seems to behave like Dr. Christian Sheppard-Lost) I think were going to learn a lot more about her...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yiyi15 September 2013 at 23:12

    Sorry I didn't make it clear. Rachel is a complicated role and I do like the twisted plots on her. what I meant was most of Rachel's plots were not as complete as others. they didn't give all her stories but tell parts of hers, which caused misunderstandings on Rachel.

    Like I can understand why Rachel acted aggressive or overprotective on her children, and I can also understand why Rachel hates Bass so much. I can see all of them from details in S1. For instance, some moves implying that she was tortured and raped when she was captured as a prisoner in that 8 years, she surrounded herself to Miles/Bass in order to protect her family, she's not heartless because she's caring Charlie and Danny, and even all of the children in the world (the flashback with Ben, she felt guilty and thought she caused the blackout but in fact it was Randall's fault not hers). Her tears, her thoughts and her hates are so real, so reasonable. But all the evidences were hided in details. This is why most people couldn't notice them. This is why I'm unsatisfied with how the writers deal with Rachel's storyline. Because for some people, they only believed the most obvious plots and never thought about the hidden massages. They had sympathy on Charlie and thought like her "oh yeah Rachel is an awful mother. " In the show Charlie didn't know what happened on Rachel (it's ridiculous to be honest, Nora was tortured in that 21days and Charlie never thought about what happened when her mother was captured by Bass in that EIGHT years??? and the first time Charlie met her mother was in a jail, she even never thought that her mother suffered a lot before??? it didn't make any sense at all), while in the fact all Rachel's stories had showed (in details) but wasn't highlighted. Writers only focused on Charlie's thoughts and feelings but ignored the descriptions of Rachel's stories, why did they do that? to lead people misunderstand on Rachel on purpose? I don't get it. Rachel and Bass are the most complicated characters in this show, but they treated Rachel in an incorrect way. Rachel is not a villain. She's just a mother and focusing on the primary mission. It's so frustrated and so sad to see some people keep insulting on her.

    I agree with you that in Season 2 they'll give more about Rachel's stories, I saw all the promo vid and photos and I can't wait to see it right now:) hope they can do it in a right way this time.

    ReplyDelete
  8. DarthLocke415 September 2013 at 23:30

    Fair enough. -But I do think we are not yet to understand her on purpose (as you ask.)

    The reason why Charlie can't accept Rachel, is because she feels betrayed and abandoned. Nora was never her mother and never 'left her behind', Nora was captured. But I agree that over time it should be easier for Charlie to understand why Rachel was put in a precarious situation and/or why she had to leave (to protect them)...I think that's one reason she goes to hunt Monroe down in the second episode of the second season, because she's blaming it all on him (which honestly, she should. Although I think Ben will come off more and more as a guy who failed to take responsibility for his actions)...

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.