The episode begins with Monroe (David Lyons) learning that the Nevilles have snuck out of town and that their son has been seen alive. Monroe is clearly becoming paranoid and kills the Captain who bears the bad news to him because he was Neville's aide. Monroe also looks to be finding solace in alcohol. I hope that this is not the beginning of the end for Monroe as I’ve very much enjoyed Lyons. I’m still hoping they’ve got more for him to do other than simply unraveling and that we’ll see him reunited with Miles (Billy Burke) in flashbacks and in ‘present’ day.
Burke gives a wonderful performance in the episode as Miles is faced with one of the people he betrayed – a young soldier whom he mentored and considered a son. Miles trained Alec and gave Alec the knife his grandfather gave to his father who gave it to him. In flashback, we see that Miles had to sacrifice Alec to prevent a war. Alec botched an assassination attempt, and therefore, Miles has to give them Alec to placate them. Alec feels betrayed as he expected Miles to protect him. Ultimately, Alec feels even more betrayed because when he finally did return to the Republic, Miles had left, making Alec feel like his sacrifice had been for nothing. Ironically, it is Miles’ family knife with which he once again must sacrifice Alec for the greater good – to stop the detonating of the nuclear device.
Alec also manages to hurt Miles by telling Charlie (Tracy Spiridakos) that Miles did something to her mother. It may be that he sacrificed her to the greater good or the Republic as well, with no regard to her being “family.” I wonder if their history had anything to do with Rachel’s (Elizabeth Mitchell) determination to leave. Other than coming to Miles’ rescue by shooting Alec when Miles was doing very little to protect himself, no doubt out of guilt, Charlie really has very little to do in this episode. Nora (Daniella Alonso) also had little to do in this episode. In fact, they don’t even get to rescue Miles from the Georgia Governor (Leslie Hope).
The episode is, however, populated with interesting women. The Governor proves to be a good leader who has both protected her people and made the economy grow while fostering international relations with England. I felt bad that had Maggie ever made it to Georgia, she might have been able to reunite with her family. Interestingly, the Governor also has a history with Miles. It seems likely that they had a relationship at some point in the past. I am getting a little weary of Miles having – apparently – slept with every woman we meet.
Meanwhile, Rachel and Aaron (Zac Orth) find Jane Warren (Kate Burton). Warren rescues them from two men attacking them by burning them to a crisp with what looks like a Star Trek phaser. We never do learn what it is which is annoying. We are left to simply surmise that she is scary smart. We do learn that the nanites are keeping her partner Beth (Avis-Marie Barnes) alive because she is in stage-four cancer – and has been since the lights went out. We also learn that the device Rachel took out of Danny was what was keeping him alive too. So there seems to be some sort of conspiracy to set the nanites free in order to save loved ones. Mitchell really knocked it out of the park in the scene in which she tells Warren that if she’d known the price she would have to pay to keep Danny alive she would have let him die. In the end, it’s Beth who convinces Jane to help.
By the end of the episode, Miles is pushing Charlie away, telling her that he hurts everyone around him and he doesn’t even think twice about it. Of course, he wouldn’t be so torn up with guilt if he didn’t care. Foster asks him to be a General again – she will give him two hundred men and unlimited guns if he’ll lead them and his rebels against Monroe when she attacks. Ironically, it is Monroe’s “ruthlessness” that made him a good and effective General. It will be interesting to see if he can continue to forge relationships and be an effective General. I’m curious to see if Neville (Giancarlo Esposito) turns up to join his son with the Rebels and if he does join, if he can be trusted.
I liked that we again have a split storyline which surprises me as I was simply annoyed at Rachel having to go off on her on again last week. I felt that having the two stories running parallel helped tighten the action up. It was also interesting to see the two sides to the theme of what you will do for family – or won’t – and how that may help or hinder the greater good. I thought the episode did hold together well thematically. Both Burke and Mitchell turned in wonderful performances. I thought the crowd scenes were well done and used small spaces well to make it feel like a much larger population. When Charlie stopped on passing out of the Republic to remark that she’d never left it before, I flashed instantly to Lord of the Rings when Sam Gamgee – also a “hick” – says to Frodo that as they leave the Shire that he’d never been so far from home before. Sam becomes the friend and moral compass for Frodo as he struggles on his journey to do the right thing and not lose the essence of himself in the process, so that is a nice parallel to cast Charlie in with Miles. I did think that for such a strong entity, Georgia’s borders were ridiculously flimsily guarded. Also? The title – “The Night the Lights Went Out in Georgia” – was a classic music title shout out from Kripke. It’s also nice that the show actually shoots in Georgia and is now set there. It’s also convenient that the Governor has insured that Georgia is rich, so they can use locations that aren’t falling down.
Next week’s episode looks intense. It looks like we are quickly moving toward another kind of "revolution." What did you think of this episode? Should Miles agree to become a General? Should the Rebels join forces with them? Did you want to know more about the mysterious Jane Warren and her super weapon? Let me know in the comments below.









Thanks Lisa, just off to watch it now :)
ReplyDeletethanks for the review:)
ReplyDeleteIt's obviously that Monroe has serious trust issues, maybe since Miles left him. So excited to see that Miles finally has an army against him. It was so sad when Miles said to Charlie what kind of person he is and pushed her away. But I think it's actually who he was and it reminded me of what Rachel said in last episode "you can't be who you were". Miles's already changed because of Charlie, but people he knew in the past just kept reminding him what a horrible person he was, which is the tragedy that he's trying so hard to change what he did as redemption.
The love stories between Miles and different women started to make me sick a little bit. At the beginning I was so sure he would end up with Nora. Then Rachel appeared, and thanks to the excellent performance by Elizabeth Mitchell, Miles and Rachel became my OTP from this show. In this episode, history mentioned between Miles and Kelly(not sure the name though), the next episode we'll have another one.....I laughed so hard when i saw you wrote that he might sleep with every women we meet:)
But for the relationship between Miles and Rachel, it seemed more than a love story. From what Alec said and when Rachel and Miles met she slapped him on his face, i felt the story between those two were more completed. Can't wait to see more stories between them:) Besides, Nora is becoming a less attractive role according to recent episodes, I can't see the meaning of this role exists except she brought Miles and Charlie into Rebels networks.
The way Jane killed those two militia just liked those mysterious cases in Fringe:) I hope these two group of people could gather at the tower in season finale: Rachel and Aaron eventually have all the information they need and arrive there, while Miles and Charlie get there to help them.
Good review--nice comments on the parallels between plots--but I'm not sure what I thought of this episode. Maybe because I missed a few minutes of it. Anyway, I was a bit bugged by some of the character history stuff--not the Miles having a sexual relationship (apparently) with every woman who ever existed--who is he, Captain Kirk?--but other "small world" character stuff. I suppose it's inevitable in a way that Miles will keep running into Monroe people or former Monroe people he knows from his past, but it's a motif I think is played out, and the surrogate son thing didn't wash terribly well for me, maybe because the flashback format just doesn't allow time for the depth of the relationship to be developed. We meet a character we've never seen before, learn his terrible importance to Miles, and then see him die, all in one episode.... I also think the show has more than enough room for drama without a character having to choose to sacrifice family for the greater good every week--which is what it's beginning to feel like.
ReplyDeleteInteresting point they made nothing of: the huge Jesus Saves mural in Atlanta. Is the Republic of Georgia a Christian state, and if so, how/why will that matter? Hmmmm.
I was also interested/irked to learn that the nanites in fact do more than just absorb electricity and replicate, the two instructions Rachel said they had programmed into them--and, I'm pretty sure, the only two she said they had. This pretty clearly was a lie, as we learn this week that she knows they do more than that. so, good news in that there's room for the problems with the nanite explanation to be worked out, bad news in that Rachel apparently lied to Aaron after telling him she'd tell him everything. And the point of that would be...? (I know, holding back facts from the audience so we keep on being intrigued, but come on, people!)
Georgia is the Bible belt - but it opens up some intriguing possibilities. Rachel lying could be to protect herself or make the decision to turn them off easier for everyone. I guess only time will tell...
ReplyDeleteI agree that they've really lost the thread for Nora which is a shame. Fingers crossed we see more of her. I actually prefer Miles with her though I agree Burke and Mitchell do have great chemistry. The whole brother's wife thing does creep me out a bit - but then, what if they were an item before Ben and Rachel got together? That could be interesting too. Love the idea of all the story threads ending up back at the Tower...
ReplyDeleteWelcome!
ReplyDeleteI loved the episode! But then, I love any episode where Miles is the central focus. However, the synopsis for this episode lied when it said "the familial bond between Miles and Charlie grows stronger." That's exactly the opposite of what happened. I liked the direction their relationship was headed, particularly after "Kashmir" and "Nobody's Fault but Mine," and have been disappointed with almost zero Miles/Charlie interaction. Don't get me wrong, I understand why showing his relationship with Alec was important but I would have liked it better if it brought Miles and Charlie closer together than pushing them further apart.
ReplyDeleteExcellent review, I like this episode a lot and I agree with you about Miles and Charlie relationship (btw great parallel with Frodo and Sam of TLOR).
ReplyDeleteThanks!
ReplyDeleteI agree - I want to see Miles and Charlie get closer. This incident may have given Charlie more insight into Miles if it hadn't made her a lot more focused on what he did to her mother! I can't see that revelation being anything but bad for them growing closer.
ReplyDeleteI cannot believe the two of you cannot see the simplest solution to this problem with the nanites: there are more then one single type of them. At this point we know that nanites are the cause of the power outage (very ST:TNG of them) but, why not nanites for repairing cellular damage due to cancer or other maladies and injuries. For that matter you could have a nanite designed to do just about anything. And if you really want to be technical about it you could say that nanites do not attack other nanites therefore no power loss to fellow nanites. The only issue becomes if you have something like 500 million million nanobots in the world-- all of which are performing one simple task-- why cannot you just turn off specific groups of nanobots???? Or if you cannot turn off the nanobots-- why not change their commands: instead of absorbing electricity- perhaps just have them conduct electricity. It isn't perfect solution, but it will allow them to have characters tell the truth without lying. So when Rachel says they have two functions-- the nanobots in question could only have those two functions. However, they could have literally created hundreds and hundreds of different nanobots for various functions.
ReplyDeleteAt the end of the day the Nanobots turning off the power is still scientifically stupid! If they stop the flow of ions and electrons-- well they would stop pretty much all forms of the electromagnet spectrum: radio waves, gamma waves, microwaves, visible light, UV Light, IR Light, simple magnetism, and so on and so forth. All the things we associate with electromagnetism would come to and end! Including the firing of neurons and muscle responses!
Nanobots are as stupid as Monroe making a Nuclear Bomb without any power! I sometimes thing the only thing Kripke cares about is amount of sword play he can work into an episode.
I want to see Charlie sold into prostitution!
ReplyDeleteI'm sure that we will find out a LOT more about the nanites. I cannot believe that you didn't notice that Kripke didn't write last nights episode... Also, if you hate the show this much, why are you watching?
ReplyDeleteMiles slept with every woman and betrayed every man hahaha
ReplyDeleteKripke is the show runner and head of the writing room. He over sees all the episodes that get produced. So every episode has to get his seal of approval--that means in essence that Kripke accepted all of the crap these other minions of his have writing staff do has please him. And form what I can gleam from interviews and other sources is that Kripke is basically a guy that wants the "Oh Cool Factor"... Which is why his stuff is so terrible. As for the nano-robotic machines-- well I have to say this they will never actually make the show better. I want to know how they will explain way the fact that earlier in the series the team was clearly not working on nano-robotic technology. How did this work into the script? And why did they put them into Danny? I think it is hysterically bad writing.
ReplyDeleteHe had the bomb made for him after the power was turned off. That is the point of the entire episode Ghosts... You could even build a nuclear bomb out of spare parts if you couldn't test explosive lens...
ReplyDeleteNo they didn't... Episode 6 did not do that at all. They implied it... nothing came of it. I want to see it for real.
ReplyDeleteThere is a difference between overseeing a writing room and showrunning and writing the episode - but I won't debate how the business works with you - personally I have no issues with how Kripke runs a show or crafts a storyline. I happen to like the swordplay. Again, I have to ask if you think Kripke is so worthless why did you bother to even check out the show - and if you hate it so much, don't watch!
ReplyDeleteokay, don't debate. The fact is that Kripke is the guy that says "yes" or "no" to all the stories his writing room pitches to him. So at the end of the day he is the guy that says: "this works for me" and "this doesn't work for me". So, I think it is fair to say that Kripke is the go to guy when things fail miserably. And why is it people always say "things like don't watch"-- I'm just discussing the episode. (On a side note: the Pilot had 14+ million viewers and now episode 14 had 6.16 million in viewers-- you might want to get everyone you can to watch this show if you want a second season!)
ReplyDeleteAs to why I watch-- the comedy of it all. It is a great lesson in the decline of our collective sense of what is considered quality entertainment. It really hammers home my theory about how our culture is devolving at an exponential rate.
I think you'll find far more immediate evidence of cultural devolution in "Reality" television (The Bachelor? Celebrity Apprentice? Jersey whatever it was called? Honey frickin' Boo Boo?????) than in any of the current SF shows, but maybe that's just me.
ReplyDeleteMind you, the notion that society is going to hell in a handbasket is only about one generation younger than society itself....
You can't build one without radioactive material, either, and he didn't get that until AFTER he had power again. Just 'cuz we didn't see him testing the components once he got power, doesn't mean he didn't do so. (But yes, slapping together a nuke in the time frame apparently available between Monroe getting power back and when the bomb was ready is implausible. Of course, temporal compression is a time-honoured dramatic convention. Just look at Shakespeare's plays, for instance.)
ReplyDeleteDid you hear? Revolution was renewed...
ReplyDeletelol! Maybe if the show were on HBO....
ReplyDelete