Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Alcatraz - Dissecting the Mysteries


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Alcatraz - Dissecting the Mysteries

20 Feb 2012

Share on Reddit
Thanks to Darthlocke for the heads up.

TVGuide.com turned to executive producers Jennifer Johnson and Dan Pyne to answer some of the questions we've been keeping track of. For instance: Who are the powers that be that are behind the '63s' disappearance? We may be meeting one of them soon!

Will the reason why Tommy Madsen is so important come to light soon?
Dan Pyne: Yes. Everything's building towards that in midseason. That would be the question that's answered in the last episode.
Jennifer Johnson: A lot of things are going to come together having to do with the inmate's blood, Tommy Madsen and what's behind the Warden's door.

Is there a particular reason why Alcatraz prison became the focus point of the disappearance?
Johnson: Yeah. There are theories that our characters have. We'll talk about what those theories are by the end of the season, but they may not be the real ones. We'll understand what Hauser thinks about it and what his think-tank thinks about it, but that's really just the tip of the iceberg. We may meet a character by the end of the season who does know that specific answer, who probably has a lot more answers than any of the characters we've met so far.


Will we learn who the powers that be are and what their motives are this season? Or is that a series arc?
Pyne: Well, it's a little of both. I think by the end of [Episode] 13 we'll have an understanding of who that might be.
Johnson: That's the character that we were referring to. He might be part of the powers that be.
Pyne: But definitely by the end of the season there will be more of a sense of the game that's afoot. We won't be coy about it and keep holding back. There will be a better sense of what's going on. We may not understand what the endgame is, but at least the players will become a little bit clearer.
Johnson: It's complicated because they don't all have the same goals, which we're going to hit upon before the end of the season. There's almost a secret war happening between the '63s, too. That all interplays with what their relationships were in the past when they were imprisoned or working on Alcatraz.

Source: Full Article @ TV Guide

11 comments:

  1. Interesting stuff!

    I always felt there was sort of a "freedom fighter" faction of the 63s led by Tommy Madsen. They escaped whatever or wherever they are being held and just want their lives back. The others are just psycho and still go killing etc...

    I'm intrigued by this new mystery person too. I have never had a strong feeling that any one of the current regulars is behind everything. So a new character that is behind it fits my analysis better. Love that Beauregard is a bit mercurial! Should be fun to see Leon Rippy being petty.

    Interesting that Rebecca's ex-partner fits into everything. I wonder if he is/ was a 63. I always thought he has an odd almost 70's look to him, but since he died right away I never took the time to go back and look at him. So if he is involved and/or a 63, was Tommy being a good guy when he killed her partner? Protecting her from the greater mystery and trying to save her life? Hmmm.....

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am glas about "the many factions" aspect tot the 63-ers! --And I am glad we get to learn "the first layer" (???) of what's behind the door by the end of the season!

    ReplyDelete
  3. yeah I wasn't expecting an actual story regarding her partner...It seems like there is a lot more to everything XD

    ReplyDelete
  4. From early on I have had this image of Tommy Madsen as Spartacus in my mind for some reason. XD 
    Like he found out ahead of time that something bad was going to happen, prepared for it and found a way to get out of it and helped some others get out of it. 

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow were are finally getting into the nitty gritty,i can't wait to see what unfolds! 

    ReplyDelete
  6. very cool interview.  I feel like it helps us focus our theories and whatnot.. as of late it could just go anywhere..

    i need to think about the door and the warden more.. it's very important to him.. a deep secret.. my immediate thought is everyone answers to someone and is the warden getting his instructions from the person/thing behind the door.. how did it get there? under a prison?!

    love the triangle comment about Hauser, Lucy and the Jump. interesting to go back and rewatch the first couple episodes when they were interacting and we didn't know they loved each other..

    ReplyDelete
  7. This show is really well structured.  There are so many moving parts and so much mythology to go through, yet the show remains a solidly build procedural program.  It would be very easy for a show like this to shift into a more serialized structure like Fringe but Alcatraz seems to be able to accomplish a lot of the same goals while still maintaining its status as a case-of-the-week show.

    ReplyDelete
  8. In the first couple recaps I went through a little bit of history of the Island...It's been a prison since the civil war, and prior to that it was owned by Mexico, and before that the Spanish and native Americans used the Island...

    I can't help to think that whatever is there has been there a long time...part of me itches a little towards something like "Cowboys and Aliens", like some piece of technology got left behind or something!

    But it's interesting about the Warden, because I always feel so hot and cold with him in terms of his villainry! 

    I am glad there's a good amount of myth for us to be interested in!

    ReplyDelete
  9. It really is done well. I mean I think there is quite a bit of meat there for those of us who like it, but it's also possible just to watch it for it's 1963-er of the week aspect, because even they by themselves are interesting enough.

    ReplyDelete
  10.  i'll have to go back and re-read your recaps. ;o)

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.