Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Sherlock - Criticised over raunchy pre-watershed scenes


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Sherlock - Criticised over raunchy pre-watershed scenes

4 Jan 2012

Share on Reddit



The BBC has been criticised by family viewers after a nude dominatrix appeared in the hit detective drama Sherlock this weekend before the 9pm watershed.

Starring Benedict Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman, the modern-day adaptation of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's 1891 Sherlock Holmes short story A Scandal in Belgravia aired on New Year's Day.

The episode feature actress Laura Pulver wearing just diamond earrings and high heels at one point as she played dominatrix Irene Adler.


Read on: Digital Spy

Moral: 'Sherlock' nude scenes won't be removed in repeat, says BBC (also DS)

(via)

29 comments:

  1. I'm sure worse things have happened.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As I recall, nothing full frontal went on, if it did I missed it. But as usual BBC viewers are being their usual complaining selves, pathetic. x.x 

    ReplyDelete
  3. I wonder if those same "family viewers" were ok with people (including innocent landladies) being abducted at gunpoint, or would have been okay with a violent killing if it that type of killer Sherlock was chasing in the episode... The answer of course is yes. 

    They are not worried about their kids seeing adult themes, just implied nudity and implied sexual situations. Never mind the mass murders or gaping head wounds. I guess they are acceptable family viewing? 

    Nothing irks me more than hypocritical family viewers that complain about "sex" (even when there was no sex or nudity), but give violence a pass. If your child is too young to see implied nudity they are too young to see violence and blood and should not be watching anyway!  

    Parents (like those noted in the article) need to stop passing their personal issues and insecurities with sex onto their children and grow up themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think they were more worried that she was a strong-minded female who stood tall and nude, than the typical coy and innocent female nude trying to hide her nakedness away from the world. 

    ReplyDelete
  5. The so called "nude" scenes were carefully shot and there was only a hint of S&M, the wowser brigade strikes again. 

    ReplyDelete
  6. Oh, boo hoo.  It's Claudine from True Blood in her birthday suit.  I approve.

    ReplyDelete
  7. dramatics!
    It's not like they showed anything. They made sure of that.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Nudity is a part of life, get over it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Basically a time before which adult themes should not be shown in the UK

    ReplyDelete
  10. Before 9pm, ie before you send your kids to bed.

    ReplyDelete
  11. In that episode, Sherlock Holmes - one of the most recognizable characters in the history of fiction; the hero of the piece - tortures a guy and throws him out of a window, for no reason other than revenge.

    Implied nudity is what they have a problem with? I mean, I don't really have a problem with any of it, but man.... 

    ReplyDelete
  12. Good for the BBC sticking to there guns!

    ReplyDelete
  13. it was terrible! i think i saw some shoulder. in my day the producer would have been beheaded for such a thing!

    ReplyDelete
  14.  Here,Here! If it is shown early maybe they could move it up an hour,but really kids don't go to bed at 8 anymore,half the time they are still out at 9,10 at night on school nights.Next they will probably boycott demanding it being taken off the air!

    You left me a message early today and when i clicked on it it sent me to the activity thingy in disqus,when i started looking for it,it became the needle in the hay sack. Sorry!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Not so much as one proper buttock anywhere in the episode, and the uproar begins all the same.  
    I'll grant I wouldn't care to answer a little kid asking, "Mommy, what's a dominatrix?," but nudity there was not.  As others have written, a child old enough for themes of murder, brutality, and terrorism can handle _implied_ nudity!

    ReplyDelete
  16. There something mildly comforting in knowing that there is a small, loud, extremely annoying minority complaining about what's seen on television in the UK as well as here in the US.

    We have the same types of rules. 8pm (7pm central :-) is kid hour.  You can kill...but you can't show the violence.   Just an actor laying on the floor.  No blood.  I don't even think you can show injuries.   By 9pm your kids are supposed to be in bed.   Of course here in America everyone is insanely freaked out over the human body.  

    ReplyDelete
  17. "The episode feature actress Laura Pulver wearing just diamond earrings and high heels at one point as she played dominatrix Irene Adler."
    That's not fair, I'm pretty sure she was wearing a ring too.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Sign of how distorted our perception of sex and violence is.

    ReplyDelete
  19. They're as hypocritical as the US parents council folks. Violence and gore: okay. Nudity: absolutely shameful.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Like with most stories about complaints about UK TV you often find out people only complain after reading it in papers like the Daily Mail and half the time they hadn't even watched the episode in question.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Honestly I can not see what people were getting worked up about.

    ReplyDelete
  22. So it's Ok that Sherlock throws a guy out a window but not to see a woman naked?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Oh no. They are much, much worse.

    Here, the PTC issues a release that the press openly mocks while reporting and we all move on. There, the trades seem to take the whiny side and it becomes a week long scanadal.

    ReplyDelete
  24. OMG How dare they..... its not like they dont have MTV where you can see all this things.. 

    ReplyDelete
  25. If you look it's all come from the Daily Mail...they have a running campaign to slur the BBC as often as they can.  Over here we take what they print as news with a pinch of salt, it's just another Murdock rag XD

    ReplyDelete
  26. There's several afaik, certain themes (sex, violence, swearing) can only be shown after a certain times on the main channels. 

    ReplyDelete
  27. Exactly, the Daily Fail have done it again.  What they really mean is that ;the BBC aren't on our political side therefore we shall smear them whenever we have a chance' :(

    ReplyDelete
  28. Indeed! It has happened so many times now that good on the BBC for sticking to their guns over this one.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.