Today on Vulture, Joe Adalian takes a look what’s really going on over at AMC, the programming powerhouse that’s been at a war with the talent behind hits like Mad Men and The Walking Dead:
Several industry insiders Vulture interviewed about AMC's woes theorized that the network's problems stem, at least to a degree, from the fact that its leadership is largely new to the world of big money TV deals, and as a result may have made some beginner mistakes. AMC chief Charlie Collier was running ad sales for CourtTV (now truTV) before he took over the network in 2006; programming head Joel Stillerman came to his gig from the world of film production (though he did spend many years in production at MTV). Despite having fans in Hollywood — Fox TV Studio's Madden, for one, says he admired the way both men took the hit when outrage erupted over the season finale of The Killing — their greenness may have prevented them from seeing how their negotiations were all going to play out.
After all, Hollywood deal-making is all about leverage, and the media is often used as a weapon in high-profile talks: When actors are looking for huge pay bumps, their demands often magically appear in print long before a deal is done in part because network and studio execs are hoping they'll be shamed by press accounts painting them as "greedy." The Darabont dust-up didn't involve any contract negotiations — it was all about budgeting, but there, too, AMC was at a disadvantage: On paper, its reported request that Dead reduce its budget from $3.4 million in season one (a number inflated by the high costs of the pilot and start-up costs) to around $2.8 million per episode in season two doesn't seem wholly unreasonable. (A report in the Los Angeles Times says the figure was even less: just $250,000 per hour.) But, as one exec notes, "It's a bitter pill to ask someone to swallow when you ask them to cut their budget and they're the No. 1 show among adults 18 to 49 ever in basic cable history." It doesn't matter that $2.8 million is a figure that would make most basic cable showrunners green with envy; to a creator like Darabont, it was a slap in the face, and his reps made sure post-dismissal stories painted him as a victim of bean counters.
Source: Full Article @ Vulture


VERY interesting article!
ReplyDeleteI always felt it seemed like AMC was making rookie mistakes or errors no other network would make in their negotiations. I guess they were rookies or relatively inexperienced and just did not know what hey were doing in that regard. IT was all new to them and they were learning on the fly.
One would think they would learn fast seeing as they had previous negotiations with Mad Men. Maybe change tactics a little in the future instead of repeating the process for each subsequent negotiation.
Their creative team is stellar. AMC has some of the most original and best concept series on TV, but they need some new blood on the business side. Some one who understands the cable network market and how to get things done without making the network look like idiots. That can only damage the image of a network in the long run!
AMC deserves the right to renegotiate deals so the network can make money... or maybe make more money. But under no circumstances should they be messing with the creativity of their shows. Without the shows, the great shows, its just a blank screen with a 3-letter logo.
ReplyDeleteI second that!
ReplyDeleteTotally agree
ReplyDeleteVery interesting article thanks
ReplyDeleteI thoroughly enjoyed this article and it was nice to see AMC not come off as the bad guy for once. This is by far more balanced than most of the things I've read.
ReplyDelete