Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon The Mentalist - Season 4 - Did Patrick Jane Really Kill Red John?
Sign Up


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Get In Touch
 Join SpoilerTV
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

The Mentalist - Season 4 - Did Patrick Jane Really Kill Red John?

19 Jul 2011

Share on Reddit
Thanks to cckia27 and Alejandra, the forum The Mentalist: Foro en Español for sending us this.

It was perhaps last season's boldest finale. After three seasons, The Mentalist's Patrick Jane (Simon Baker) finally came face-to-face with the man he believed to be Red John (guest-star Bradley Whitford), the serial killer who killed Jane's wife and daughter. The two had a long, intense conversation as Jane tried to confirm that he was indeed in the presence of his nemesis. Once he did just that, Jane took his vengeance, shooting the man in broad daylight and surrendering himself to the authorities that came charging in.

Spoiler alert: Simon Baker talks about The Mentalist's shocking season finale

But did he really kill Red John? And if so, what does that mean for both Jane's future (is he going to jail?) and the show's long-term goals? TVGuide.com chatted with creator and executive producer Bruno Heller to get the answers

Source: Full Article @TV Guide
-
Sign Up for the SpoilerTV Newsletter where we talk all things TV!

9 comments:

  1. chestal19 July 2011 at 11:40

    That's we all are asking ourselves!! XD but nice article! I hope this all goes well in the end! :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ashwaq19 July 2011 at 14:09

    very nice article indeed .. & S4 premiere looks promising

    ReplyDelete
  3. solea19 July 2011 at 16:04

    Heller always talks much and says nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Emily19 July 2011 at 16:20

    The way the interview ended, it sounds like Bradley Whitford (who I've been in love with since West Wing!) probably wasn't Red John, IMO. I'm wondering if they'll do something like Bones did with Gormagon: there was always a Master _and_ an Apprentice. Since RJ had the whole 'network' thing going... If nothing else there'll be clean-up to do.

    This is looking like it will be so awesome!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bruce_F19 July 2011 at 20:05

    That had better have been Red John.  The best way out of this would be for Red John to be dead, yet his disciples (read: cult) continue his work, thus tormenting Jane.  They can call them "Friends of John."

    ReplyDelete
  6. MariaZ19 July 2011 at 20:14

    I liked that interview. He just gives the little push to want me to watch without blurting out any spoilers.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Folie-lex19 July 2011 at 20:15

    I have to say I'll feel very cheated if it turns out he wasn't Red John...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Tania20 July 2011 at 00:00

    Whether he was Red John or not, either way I'm very much looking forward to the new season. I like articles like this, because it's just enough to tease you and push you on edge, making you eager to watch the premiere. If they reveal too much, the suspense will just dissipate.

    Temporary friends or a deeper bond? I wonder if some of them will have a change of heart. I hope it won't be Lisbon... Wooo Jisbon tension.

    Also wondering how they'll write Grace in the premiere, having lost her fiancé the way she did.

    Come on Sept. 22nd.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Emily20 July 2011 at 01:14

    Oh, I'd forgotten about Grace with all the RJ stuff! Thanks for reminding me! So can't wait...

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.