After ending its premiere episode with the reveal that the FBI wanted Mike to investigate Briggs, Graceland came back for a second week with trust issues, new character introductions, and more set up.
It came back a little weaker. There was a lot of time allocated to set up – the full first half to be precise. While this was an issue in the premiere as well, I was more forgiving with the pilot because set up is important to orientate us viewers so that we know who and what we’re watching, and so that we care. This episode seemed to meander in the first half, jumping around from Mike’s jog on the beach, Jakes’ birds and cop-killing bullets, Johnny’s smelly breakfast, karaoke with a newly introduced Paige, and finally Mike’s introduction to his shrink/case handler - none of which built much suspense. It wasn’t until the second half where the tension started to build, culminating with a shocking ending of Briggs pulling a gun on Mike.
This show has a different structure than most of spy series on USA Network (i.e. Burn Notice, Covert Affairs, White Collar). While the others almost always anchor the episode in a strong case, or objective, of the week, and the character interactions and storytelling unfold around the fringes of the main story, this episode was jarring because it was only the series’ second episode (a little too early for the tension between Mike and Briggs to carry the whole episode), and because the case of the week, when it was introduced (a plan that included using cop-killing bullets to get close to a bad buy and to take down Paige’s Bobby problem), clearly took a backseat to the focus on the increasing distrust and animosity between Mike and Briggs.
Who’s the bad guy?
Let’s talk a little about Briggs and Mike. Mike doesn’t trust Briggs with good reason, and Briggs doesn’t trust Mike with good reason. We saw Briggs reviewing Mike’s folder in the premiere, obviously already suspicious that Mike might have been placed at Graceland for an ulterior purpose. Somehow Mike’s trip to his “shrink,” and his response that he’s going to have weekly sessions, tipped off Briggs that Mike was lying. And Briggs knew about Mike’s call to the FBI office. Was Briggs watching Mike more closely than he appeared while Mike was in line for the Guadalajara dog, or did Briggs have a different way of knowing about Mike’s phone call (a bug on Mike’s phone or a spy at the hot dog stand)?
Mike came across as cocky and smug considering he’s fresh out of the academy with almost zero experience, and Briggs seemed set on pushing Mike’s buttons and putting him in his place. Mike is a rules guy and Briggs did everything he could to shake him. As a fan of the network’s other spy shows, I’m used to an off-the-wall, genius and risky plan being pulled off successfully and saving the day. That is just another day in the office on White Collar (a show also created by Graceland’s executive producer Jeff Eastin). But the difference is Peter and Neal from White Collar are usually united in the end goal (and if they are not, we know their good intentions). Briggs’ sudden change of plans and his attempts at pushing Mike out of his comfort zone were aggressive. They were about putting Mike in his place. After the job was successfully completed, Briggs made a big show of skimming some cash – again a way of asserting his dominance and unsettling Mike. Does Briggs usually take a cut of the cash? Possibly, or maybe not. This may have been just to rattle Mike.
Briggs’ behavior may have been about getting him to reveal his intentions, but it also seemed personal. We learned Briggs was a lot like Mike before whatever changed him transpired. There could be some resentment – that Mike still has his innocence and idealism – and maybe Briggs wants to bring Mike over to Briggs’ way of thinking to justify his own actions to himself.
Mike wearing green
Now Mike, on the other hand, seemed to take a step backward from the premiere when he was really smart. He ran after a chips thief at Hector's Tacos. I get it, he’s a rules guy, but even I know undercover agents don’t break their cover for something so minor. And the bad fake accent – my thought was that he’s been watching Burn Notice. But if had been watching Burn Notice, he would know he doesn’t break his cover. Briggs outmatched him by a mile. Mike had it right when he said Briggs hits the trifecta when everyone else is still sizing up the horses.
In a review of the pilot, I said I was pleasantly surprised that Mike didn’t seem to be the typical young, inexperienced, impulsive character we sometimes see placed in the lead. I take it back now. The problem with this set up is that a good chunk of the show is focused on the least interesting character in the room (see Revolution as an example). Mike’s smugness, and his FBI contact bolstering Mike’s ego by telling him that he’s smarter than Briggs, didn’t do anything to win me over.
Speculation time
We’ve had two episodes so far, and both ended in unexpected twists. I think it’s a safe bet that we’re not done with the twists yet. Something happened to make Briggs cynical. I’m guessing we’ll learn that the FBI agents who want Briggs investigated aren’t exactly better than Briggs.
Another angle I’m expecting is that we’ll learn that the whole group at Graceland is in on whatever Briggs is in on. At two points in this episode, Briggs referred to the Graceland group as “misfits”: calling Graceland the “island of misfit toys” and calling the group their “merry, merry band of misfits.” Misfits are people who don’t fit in anywhere. The misfit characterization makes sense in their day-to-day life, where they assume alternative identities. Are they all misfits in their respective agencies as well?
I’m also suspicious of Charlie and what her agenda is in getting close to Mike.
Another question to ponder is what Briggs meant when he told Paige: “You know I owe you plenty.”
Finally, the Guadalajara dog we’re told is a dog sold by a food van, Sun City, that is smothered with sour cream, tomatoes, and jalapenos. It’s called the Guadalajara dog even though Guadalajara doesn’t have sour cream. Metaphorically speaking, who or what is the Guadalajara dog? I’m open to suggestions here.
Highlights
Mike: “Working on a new Mike.”
Johnny: “Sounds like a lot of work, bro.”
(I agree)
Johnny: “You almost burned Hector’s Tacos.”
Jakes: “You never burn Hector’s, man. That shit is real.”
Gratuitous shot of the SoCal shore in the early morning job win short shorts and Charlie in her walk of shame.
Briggs: “A million crimes in the city, I’m sure we can find one with training wheels.”
Mike: “What’s the signal if something goes wrong?”
Johnny: “How about ‘Oh Shit?’”
Briggs: “That’s good.”




I agree with your comments--and I believe what's still missing is the producers & writers settling on "what" this show is about. Is it a "puzzle" show, where the viewers are led from clue to clue all season long to an Earth-Shattering-Reveal in the season finale? Or is it an episodic, book-him-Dano, show where viewers are suppose to focus on the unique ways the Graceland Misfits solve crimes and bring down the Bad Guys? Or is this a show about "disillusion" as we discover the secrets to Briggs life? So far, the writers haven't given us enough to know which of these (or other possibilities) they have in mind.
ReplyDeleteThey may believe that dragging it out the show's theme will establish a stronger foundation--but, I would suggest that confusing the audience didn't play very well with the one-season J.J. Abrams series, "Alcatraz." In fact, the trend in series TV is to shorter 13 episode seasons, and away from the traditional 21 or 22 episodes--in part because most Writers Rooms can't develop and sustain good storytelling over that long a period without slipping in "filler" episodes. Of which "Guadalajara Dog" definitely is.
Going back a week, my overwhelming thought after the Pilot episode was that I wanted to come back for more to see how the actors work together, and develop their characters. But in this second episode, much of the charm and characterization is missing: most glaringly, the poor introduction of Serinda Swan as Paige. If they're just going to have the two females as eye candy, then they're taking the easy way out. Swan's character, so far, is a blank slate--which is a shame because she can deliver good performances if given the material.
And speaking of Serinda/Paige: why, oh why, did they dump the lovely Scottie Thompson after one episode? Was three women too many for this show? And why just have her go away. Most producers/writers LOVE to kill off a main character in a series--some doing so in an early episode (the BBC's "MI-5" being the best example)--so killing off Scottie's character would have been a "jolt" and established the shows willingness to do the unexpected and take risks. Verdict: opportunity lost.
Lastly, I'm going to give "Graceland" another shot next week--especially since the promo photos I've seen indicate that Mia Kirshner, who is My Fav Actress, will guest star. Mia is a master at playing seemingly-weak-but-actually-very-strong Bad Girls (remember Mandy on "24" or Jenny on "L-Word"?) and she can make even the worst written material come to life (remember "Black Dahlia"?). So, if this show can't score big time with Ms. Kirshner then I'll have to re-evaluate watching on a regular basis.
I still feel like it's early and we may get all of the things that you mention in the upcoming episodes. It seem like there's more movement in the next one. I hope this weaker second episode doesn't drive too many people away and they give the show a little longer to find it's footing. I do feel like it has potential. Or if they do go away, they come back if they start hearing good things about the show.
ReplyDeleteTo be honest, I didn't know that Scottie Thompson had such a short run on this series. She hasn't been written out yet, but that may be coming. I'll admit, I haven't been pulled into her character much because all we've seen from her is her reaction to Donnie leaving, but I thought we'd learn more about her as the series progresses. I guess I was wrong.
This is a pretty basic premise for the show we've seen it a lot. The Beast comes to mind immediately. So I'm not as concerned about the episode to episode plotting; they aren't trying for anything groundbreaking, it should sail along fine. They certainly haven't hit a stride yet, but I think this had basically a two-episode pilot. Meeting the last roommate felt like a casting change and still set-up to me.
ReplyDeleteI do disagree that super green Mike is being cocky and arrogant, I think he is trying to fit in. If he sits back and waits for Briggs to give him something, he'll never move forward, he'll never learn, and he'll never earn Briggs' respect. I think he is aware that he has limits but if Briggs isn't going to volunteer to train him, he's decided to push those limits, and from my vantage point, that is what Briggs asking for him to do--like leaving him at the airport to see if he'd follow orders or show initiative. Initiative isn't necessarily cockiness. Like the advice he got from the one roommate, he asked for advice and took it. The manual, the procedures are supposed to help you make the right decisions, Briggs insisting that that's a bad thing forces Mike to operate on instinct rather than training. Everything has been a test--down to surfing. I agree that I hate the trope ::Suits:: ::cough:: ::cough:: So I do hope that I don't change my mind about this. But right now, he's having to run forward blindly--partly because they need to keep up the suspense on whether or not Briggs is off the reservation--I don't think it is all a pissing contest, some of it is long-term plot and characterization.
I actually think this episode is an improvement from the pilot -- disagree with your comments on Mike. First thing first, his fake southern accent is not THAT bad, and this coming from a guy who lived in the south for a couple years, and a roommate who grew up in the south. But I guess that's not exactly the point. To me this episode hints some complexity to this character, most evidently in the part where he played along with the "shrink" halfway through, before busting the fake doctor. As a viewer, it's not too hard to see how those smugness and cockyness are played out to put up a "typical inexperienced impulsive rookie" facade, also seen in the first half of the "shrink" session. Now that Mike's playing a bit of "double undercover" in the house, he clearly needs some cover in his everyday life. Maybe it's a good thing now you think he's a total green bird now, because if his other roommates (including Briggs) think the same, that would be a very good situation for him honestly.
ReplyDeleteAnother thing about Mike is he's in a situation where he needs to gather as much information as possible - he doesn't know much about his roommates, he doesn't know much about his handlers and his assignment either. At the end of the pilot, he was given the instruction to "stay down", and I think that's a good stratagy for him being in Graceland.
As for the case-of-the-week in this episode, while I don't think it's particularly strong, I disagree with your comment about it "clearly took a backseat to the focus on the increasing distrust and animosity between Mike and Briggs". This case is a very good balance between settiing-up and moving the story forward. The first half of the episode, which you see as “jumping around" and doesn't build much suspense, are neatly packed in the second half's case. The point? It actually show-case the ensemble and show the point of Graceland (why three agencies in one house?) and how Graceland works -- a very nice set-up I would say.
And "the focus on the increasing distrust and animosity between Mike and Briggs"? Well, I'd rather they don't go head-long into that so soon. This story has a potential of becoming a truly engaging one in the sense of multi-story lines, a strong ensemble of characters and complicated relationships. The thing between Mike and Briggs, however it develops, would be far more interesting if everyone else in the house is deeply engaged in different ways. And I think that's what's intersting about the premise. If we only want "two smart FBI agents trying to out-smart each other: trust issues, undercover work, the story", why don't they just go with "partners in some assignment" premise, which would have a much stronger "focus" on the two leads, instead put out this fancy beach house and agents from different agencies? The group dynamic and how the two leads will play out in the center of this turmoil is what I most looking forward to in this series.
Thanks for commenting. I didn't have an issue with Mike trying to take some initiative in getting himself on cases. It was more when Mike seemed to be challenging Briggs, and yeah, the word that came to mind for the expression on his face was "smug."
ReplyDeleteFunny, but Mike on Suits doesn't bother me as much. He's just as cocky but he expresses it in humor. It also may be that I get the sense that Mike (from Graceland) already thinks he's better than Briggs, whereas Mike (from Suits) knows Harvey is the better lawyer. This is probably in good part due to Graceland Mike being put in the position of being told to investigate his boss and his mentor. He has to think of him as an equal to get the job done.
Anyway, it was just my impression this week. It may change next week. ;)
I'm glad you liked the episode. I have high hopes for the series. This episode didn't quite do it for me, but I think I might love the next one. I'll let you know. ;)
ReplyDeleteI responded to some of this a little with Isbloom about Mike and my sense that he came across as smug. The psychology is a little different because Mike was immediately put in a position of having to investigate his mentor. It may make things more interesting in the long-term but it's not rubbing me the right at the moment. Anyway, we don't have to have the same opinion. Thanks for commenting!
Ha ha. That's funny, because Mike on Suits' sanctimonious refusal to do his job, often to the detriment of his clients, is the opposite of funny to me--I almost had to stop watching at the beginning of season 2, but then they made it the Harvey/Jessica/Donna show and I relaxed. But I would agree that Mike on Graceland does have to think himself at least partly equal to Briggs in order to investigate the guy, but he wouldn't have been on the career fast track if he didn't have something to back it up. From what I've seen, IMO they are trying to make the comment that the case work at Graceland isn't at all typical FBI behavior and if Mike were in DC following the rules, he'd be a star agent.
ReplyDeleteYeah, Mike from Suits has definitely crossed several lines recently. Maybe it's like you said, the Harvey/Jessica/Donna show is so much fun to watch that it makes it worth it. Part of what might be bugging me about Graceland is that Mike just started, practically yesterday, and he already has attitude. He's got to at least give it a few weeks.
ReplyDelete