Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Once Upon a Time - Episode 2.20 - The Evil Queen - Sneak Peek 5
Sign Up


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Get In Touch
 Join SpoilerTV
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Once Upon a Time - Episode 2.20 - The Evil Queen - Sneak Peek 5

25 Apr 2013

Share on Reddit
Thanks to OnceUponATimeFans for the video.

-
Sign Up for the SpoilerTV Newsletter where we talk all things TV!

22 comments:

  1. Kristin C.25 April 2013 at 17:02

    Looks good. I'm glad we'll be seeing Hook again. I'm getting tired of Tamara. She sucks.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mal25 April 2013 at 17:04

    What IS their agenda?!!!
    Also, Tamara refers to Rumple as "The Dark One" - I'm sorry but this just sounds like she (or someone she knew) was indeed coming from the Fairy tale Land, because who else would call him that?

    And may I just mention, Hook+Tamara would make a hot evil couple. I would be careful if I were you, Greg!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Michu194525 April 2013 at 17:17

    Her Grandmother could be from Fairytale Land

    ReplyDelete
  4. Pascal21925 April 2013 at 17:31

    Tamara is a forced villain if I ever saw one.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mal25 April 2013 at 17:32

    That's my theory too. My guess is she's related to the Fairy Godmother that Rumple killed in front of Cinderella for her magic wand. I'm hoping Robin Hood will reappear because of it - he knew about the wand and its properties and not only knew how to steal magic, but also how to use it. I'm really REALLY hoping him and Tamara have some distant connection too!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Leonie198825 April 2013 at 17:38

    Yeah, he is a better bad guy, she just annoys me.

    ReplyDelete
  7. inhighheels25 April 2013 at 17:45

    For a show whose runners keep saying "evil for the sake of evil is boring", they sure don't seem too worried about explaining Tamara's agenda. Right now, she's coming off as a false and even bratty girl whose purpose in life is annoy the hell out of everyone. I need a motive, please.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Michu194525 April 2013 at 17:51

    White Robin Hood + black Tamara = "distant connection"??? Very possible, but no relation by blood, please!

    ReplyDelete
  9. KatHale25 April 2013 at 17:59

    They realize they've already pissed off half of the main characters and that's only because the other half doesn't know what's going on yet.They better have a good plan..

    It's great to see Hook again!Colin is a delight to watch,I was very pleasantly surprised.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Michu194525 April 2013 at 19:10

    "why" is a question for first theory or second?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Maria25 April 2013 at 20:01

    The whole setting kinda reminds me of "Series of unfortunate events"

    ReplyDelete
  12. Lars Lund Andersen25 April 2013 at 20:36

    I'm right with you and fast before she ruins the season.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Folie-lex25 April 2013 at 21:16

    Thats it... he doesn't care for anything else. That's what makes him tragic. That's why I feel for him. That's why I like him. He's just a sad....

    ReplyDelete
  14. magnutude25 April 2013 at 23:18

    I hope that their "method for killing magical creatures" consists more than the taser (if it is just a taser) that she used on the Dragon, because that seemed like a letdown, imho

    ReplyDelete
  15. cotty1026 April 2013 at 13:59

    Um...she's only been a villain like 5 minutes, have some patience!

    ReplyDelete
  16. inhighheels26 April 2013 at 21:46

    Sorry, but they've had plenty of useless, filler episodes. They could very well have presented more substantial information about Tamara, to make her both more interesting and consistent.

    ReplyDelete
  17. playdoc27 April 2013 at 00:51

    This trio are a pathetic bunch of villains imo. They don't even compare to one Cora. Cora...now THAT was a great villain.

    ReplyDelete
  18. playdoc27 April 2013 at 01:03

    I agree. The magic taser was the single most disappointing "magical" device I've seen so far. The "blood globe" that Rumple used to find Baelfire was super cool. Even the invisible chalk was a cooler concept, and that didn't even require a prop. I hope they modified that taser to a less laughable idea.

    ReplyDelete
  19. sunniva_he8 April 2014 at 04:33

    Damn it people!! Stop trying to kill my Rumple!!!

    ReplyDelete
  20. stormqueen8 April 2014 at 04:34

    Why?

    ReplyDelete
  21. InvestedInYourFuture8 April 2014 at 04:34

    I am more willing to bet that Tamara is Wendy's(from peter pan) grand-daughter

    ReplyDelete
  22. DarthLocke48 April 2014 at 04:37

    Disagree a bit. First it might not be "magic", but "science fiction"...(which we already have seen with the likes of Fringe scientist/Land without Color
    character/reality with Dr. Whale/Victor Frankenstein)

    However, I feel certain the Once writers are with Arthur C. Clarke on this and that "any advance technology may not be distinguishable from magic" and that using both genres/aesthetics is supporting this idea.

    It might hinting at a "futuristic" reality and/or a futuristic timeline that may or may not relate to any given reality presented thus far.

    It goes hand in hand with Owen and Kirk, as Owen may be reference to "Owen Lars" (Star Wars) and Kirk may be a reference to "Captain Kirk" (Star Trek) Also, imagine if Kirk is Neverland and has a boat!

    And then add those to the obvious "star wars" ring tone points to something futuristic down the line...

    It also may be playing homage to former associates at Bad Robot, as Mr. Abrams is now also directly associated with Star Wars --And Mr. Lindelof, who is currently co-writing a script with Brad Bird for a film centured around Disney's futuristic attraction "Tomorrowland"

    I agree it may be disappointing that it hasn't played out yet, but I'm hopeful that something with it is meant to eventually...

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.