Ask Ausiello: Spoilers on Once Upon a Time, Bones, The Office, Supernatural, HIMYM and More!
Read Spoilers Here
Read Spoilers Here
Ask Ausiello - Various Shows - 3rd January 2013
Jan 3, 2013
Bones Cancelled Shows Chicago Fire Downton Abbey How I Met Your Mother Once Upon A Time Sons of Anarchy Supernatural The Good Wife Vampire Diaries
Sign Up for the SpoilerTV Newsletter where we talk all things TV!
Well,i am disappointed that August won't be back anytime soon,but at least we will find out what was in the box.Truthfully,i rather have August back...
ReplyDeletethe caroline thing from tvd is seriously pissing me off. i will be so angry if they kill her
ReplyDeleteHear hear! Not that I'm not enjoying the new additions to the show, but I miss him so much...
ReplyDeletewhy not? she makes me sick with her thing for Klaus and the writers hate Tyler anyway, one more thing to rip away from him.
ReplyDeleteSupernatural info is old but I sure hope they can get Nick's mom back on Grimm.
ReplyDeleteHe brought an excitement to storybrooke,he also has great chemistry with Emma,and Henry,he never spoke down to Henry.I hope he comes back at some point? And you know that goes for Jamie too,but how to work him in ?
ReplyDeleteThe writers "hate" everyone on the show. Who hasn't lost almost everything?
ReplyDeleteWait the writers don't want to mess with OUAT's continuity? They should've thought about that before they already went that route! See Cora & Hook.
ReplyDeleteSam and Dean in costume just made me look at the Larping episode with a more encouraging aspect.
ReplyDeleteThe only Supernatural old part I read was it was the Larping episode, but the costume wearing by Sam and Dean was new to me. That part I might like. Just skip the fairies. Please. lol
ReplyDeleteI heard the costume thing about 3 weeks ago I think. Perhaps it was from a different site like Twitter.
ReplyDeleteHuntsman is still alive in Fairytale world, and there is a war that's going on in that plot line with mainly King George as they want to take the kingdom from him, but Regina will be still after Snow so it's possible he could end up helping the Charmings again eventually. He's helped behind the Queen's back before.
ReplyDeleteJust need to get the actor to come back! (Same goes for the actor playing August, isn't that part of the reason they can't get to August's story right now, the actor is occupied?)
Cora and Hook are less of a problem in terms of continuity than other things.
ReplyDeleteSPN-already knew that, the fact that they were both getting to dress up was spoiled by Jred back in November
ReplyDeleteYes. We already knew.
ReplyDeleteThis is probably going to be a comedy episode or at least have funny moments in it so the brothers dressing up is going to be something that is going to make us laugh; awkward knights or squires or orange sellers or something!
That's okay, I suppose but my favourite dressing up moment was when the brothers were in Tuxedo.
Double dose of over the top handsome-ness there! I wonder if a poll of favourite outfit moment has been done. :)
Really? You're joking right? Please tell me you're joking? :)
ReplyDeleteBetcha Sam's costume will be the main source of ridicule while Dean will get something cool
ReplyDeleteUsually it's the opposite.
ReplyDeleteJared and Jensen talked about dressing up for this episode during TorCon (I think TVMonkey posted here). A set report (I think it was posted here, too) also said there were seen dressed up.
ReplyDeleteReally not. What are your continuity problems with them?
ReplyDeleteMaybe it would be easier to understand if you explained your problem with the continuity?
ReplyDeletePerhaps the fact that the show kept telling us there was only one way for them to return to storybrooke and kept hammering on that fact for the first half of season 2.
ReplyDeleteSo I became invested when Emma/Snow and Cora/Hook finally showed off, even though that battle was beyond silly but that's besides the point. Emma/Snow made it the portal closed behind and five minutes later Cora/Hook magically appear on his ship at the edge of storybrooke.
That makes no sense and goes against what the show was telling us for the first half of season 2.
If they rewrite the logic on such an event why then should I believe it the next time the show told us something?
Hell we now even have the giant showing up in storybrooke according to spoiler photos. :-/
See below. :)
ReplyDeleteTrue. Sam is usually the straight guy to Dean's exaggeration but this season is so over the top and just all wrong, that any and all bounderies have been pushed aside..
ReplyDeleteLOL, yeah. I stand corrected. :)
ReplyDeleteYes,both Jamie Dornan and Eion Bailey are both in other projects now. Even though we saw both this season it was just fleeting moment,i am hoping for more screen time,somewhere down the road?
ReplyDeleteAh, I found that minor in terms of other continuity issues they brought up. That one actually matches cleverly with continuity in terms of Lake Nostros from 1.13/1.22/2.03 and with the magic bean from 1.19 but I agree that there are way too many ways and that it just makes the fairies look like assholes who wanted this to happen because they could have just offered up the tree to Rumple way back when and just skipped over the whole thing where he manipulated and destroyed people in order to create the proper chess pieces for himself.
ReplyDeleteMy bigger continuity issues is that they're actually trying to hammer home how sooper speshul Emma is with the whole "she has magic because she's the child of true love!" and that she can't get her heart stolen. However, they've also made it canon that Cora and Regina have taken a MASSIVE amount of hearts and also made it canon that True Love is a remarkably common thing. Even to the point where Aurora's mother was supposed to be under a sleeping curse before she was as mentioned by Regina in 1.02 (Aurora being of the era as Snow et al is another huge retcon error) and if her true love woke her from that curse then presumably Aurora is a Child of True Love in the exact same way Emma is yet had her heart taken. I find it extremely hard to believe that within a few years time we were shown several instances of True Love, or had it CALLED true love by the creaters/writers (Snow/Charming, Rumple/Belle, Thomas/Ella, Regina/Daniel, Nova/Dreamy, Peter/Red) yet we're supposed to believe that despite those instances children of such unions are so rare that Regina, Cora and Rumple have never come across someone whose heart they couldn't take before. It seems wholly improbable unless they introduce ANOTHER reason beyond being a child of true love that Emma is so unique or else their own canon dictates that a large number of people should be just like her.
Another one is the HUGE plothole of why Regina has Henry to start with. People like to make a big deal about how she's emotionally abusing him by trying to make him think he's crazy blah blah. But...was this not something she thought of BEFORE she adopted a child? What was she going to do when he was, you know, sixteen and couldn't be waved away from these differences just because he was young. They obviously made Henry 10 because that is the perfect age to start recognizing things yet also be able to be dismissed by adults as a kid with an active imagination, yet it doesn't seem like any thought was put in to what Regina would do that. She's an impulsive person ruled by her emotions but I really need them to explain how that would not have occurred to her and why it doesn't seem to be a question that Henry wants to ask.
Yeah, I agree, I noticed that too. Thanks you for discussing this with me, it gave me inspiration to write an article on the matter!
ReplyDelete