This week's episode of Revolution, "Kashmir", had some interesting moments, including not one but two Led Zepplin songs. While the episode had two memorable scenes for me, it won't go down as my favorite episode of the series. We are building to the mid-season finale next week, and it did feel like we were starting to tie up some plot lines in anticipation of some new ones, now that the main group's quest is almost at an end. I'm expecting a heck of a cliffhanger from Kripke next week as that was always his MO on Supernatural and Abrams is no stranger to them either. "Kashmir" was written by Jim Barnes and directed by Charles Beeson, who has now directed three of the nine episodes so far. My reservations about the episode have nothing to do with the direction and Beeson does deliver good performances from the entire cast and uses lighting and framing to add depth to virtually every scene.
My biggest reservations about this episode, unfortunately, revolve around the writing. Number one is the entire premise that our heroes would have been running out of oxygen that quickly and to the extent that they would have been hallucinating. They were in a large tunnel that wasn't air tight. While I am willing to accept that Charlie wouldn't have been hallucinating as quickly because she is smaller than Nora, Aaron, and Miles that still doesn't explain why no one else in their party does. While I realize that the budget and time constraints would have limited giving much of a storyline to the "extras", this was rather an extreme case of ignoring them completely, with the exception of Ashley and Sergeant Weebley(?). And having the Sergeant be the only character to really have anything to do made it pretty obvious that he was going to turn out to be working against them. That said, the only hallucination that felt like it accomplished anything in terms of plot was Miles'. So, I have to ask, why not simply find a way for Miles alone to have an hallucination? It would be more believable if he'd been hit in the head during the cave in. While having Charlie hallucinate at the end of the episode for much the same reason might have seemed a bit clunky, it would still have been an improvement on this very clunky plot device.
I'm expecting a climactic meeting between Miles and Monroe next week, and on our way to that moment, this week's episode gives us some great insights into the relationship between Miles and Monroe. Miles expresses concern to Charlie about coming face to face with Monroe, but Charlie doesn't understand that this could be a problem. Charlie asks Nora about what Miles was like when he was General of the militia because that is when she was with him. She tells Charlie that Miles and Monroe had been very close, but Miles had tried to assassinate Monroe. In the end, he hadn't been able to go through with it. Charlie is shocked, and once again, she grew on me a bit in this episode as we see her be a bit more vulnerable, as when she's trapped on the mine, and be a bit less stridently idealistic. She still has faith in Miles even as she learns more about him and even in the face of his revealing some of his own weakness to her. She overhears his hallucination with Monroe and admonishes him to pull it together. She tells him they won't make it without him. In the end, I'm counting on the bond that's forming between them to be the strength he draws on in his meeting with Monroe.
Not surprisingly, one of the two scenes that I really liked in this episode was Miles hallucination of Monroe. The bright lighting of the scene gave it a stark contrast to the dark tunnel - the darkness Miles was traversing mind and soul on his way to this meeting. The door opening to Monroe's office was completely reminiscent, in my mind anyway, with Dorothy opening the door of her house into Oz. I don't think they could have picked a better scene in which to use Zepplin's Kashmir, and as Monroe turns to Miles, the lyrics "all will be revealed" completely underscored the action. We learn that Miles turned on Monroe because he felt Monroe had gone too far, and that Miles is tired. Perhaps tired enough to sell out his friends. Monroe in a nicely self-reflexive note tells Miles that he's in his head and therefore knows exactly what Miles is thinking. He knows that Miles "dirty little secret" is that he wants to make it up with Monroe and be welcomed back with a hug. But we also learn that this is not a foregone conclusion, that Miles is only scared he might do this. There are enough other hints in the rest of the episode that this won't be the case, however.
Aaron's discussion with Ashley over why she's fighting ties into this theme. He asks her how old she is and if she even remembers the United States which she's fighting for. She tells Aaron that she's doing it to honor her father who brought his family to the US from Syria so his kids wouldn't grow up fearing their country. Once again, honoring family, protecting family is paramount to people's motivation. Aaron is surprised when she asks him why he's risking his life to fight for the US, and he says he just realized he was. Aaron's hallucination is about his wife - back to family. She asks him why he could be so strong on the quest for Danny when he hadn't been strong for her. It's a good question. The answer seems to be that he had to learn to be strong.
The second scene that I absolutely loved was Charlie's hallucination after she is shot. I'm betting this scene may not be universally loved, but if you are a Wizard of Oz fan, the parallels to Dorothy finding her way home after a quest in Oz are hard to resist. Kripke loves to pepper his stories with Oz references - Supernatural's Winchesters are from Kansas for a start. Once again, the lighting in this scene is brighter and more infused with color as Charlie is reunited with her father. But she knows she can't stay, that she has to save her brother, and it's Miles' voice that pulls her back. She regains consciousness with her own version of the Scarecrow, the Tinman, and the Cowardly Lion bending over her, drawn back to the real world by her family, just as Dorothy is. Tracy Spiridakos is excellent in this scene. Charlie's hallucination also nicely parallels Miles'. She is tired and tempted to stay where life would be easier, but she returns to save her brother. She tells Miles that he saved her by calling her back. Hopefully this is even more reason for Miles to choose his family when the time comes, as it, no doubt, soon will.
Back at militia headquarters, Rachel reveals what she is willing to do to save her family. Neville detects
that she's not being entirely honest and Monroe brings Dr Jaffey in to verify what she's doing. Jaffey reveals that she's actually building a bomb not a power amplifier as she said she was. Instead of helping the militia to power up its jets, missiles and tanks to kill thousands, she's been working to kill Monroe. Monroe tells her he's going to kill Danny and he no longer needs her, so she manages to get a weapon and kill Jaffey - her friend. Elizabeth Mitchell is doing an amazing job keeping us guessing about Rachel. Is she good? Is she bad? Is she simply willing to do anything to protect her family? This week's episode has me thinking she is definitely not willingly working for the militia, and she is certainly anguished as she stabs her old friend, but she is definitely ruthless.
Next week sees our last episode until March. I can't help but think that such a long hiatus is going to be a mistake though other series have managed to weather them. I'm pretty much sure that we are going to have a no holds barred cliffhanger in next week's episode. I know that I'll be back in March, will you be? Let me know your thoughts in the comments below...
Revolution 1.09 "Kashmir" Review: Over the Rainbow
Nov 20, 2012
Reviews Revolution
Sign Up for the SpoilerTV Newsletter where we talk all things TV!



Four-month hiaitus: BAD idea! I'll be back, but I suspect many won't be, unless they really pull out a good one next week.
ReplyDeleteThis episode was problematic in some respects, as you note. The running out of air thing was one obvious problem. I'm beginning, as well, to want (maybe even need) the whole power failure thing to make more sense. Electricity doesn't just come from nowhere, nor is it infinite, nor can it be stored indefinitely, so I'd like some explanation of how a tiny little pendant like that can be a battery for which an amplifier can be built. How do you amplify electricity? That seems to violate the whole conservation of energy thing.... Heck, I'd like an explanation of how a tiny little device like that can hold a charge for decades and provide power wirelessly. You could argue that this gimmick is the show's "gimme" which we should just accept, and I'm willing to go with that to an extent, but how about even a sentence or two of cod science to make it seem plausible?
As for the hallucinations ... well, as a rule I don't much care for dream/hallucination episodes, though Kripke used that gimmick very well in Supernatural on more than one occasion. I was almost expecting to hear a Kripke-esque line like "I'm in your grapefruit" (or "melon") rather than the more prosaic "head" from Monroe during that sequence. I totally vibed on Wizard of Oz with Charlie too! However, I agree that the device here didn't serve much of a purpose.
I will be back in March but having to wait until March is BS. I'm not happy about that and I think it's a really bad move for the network.
ReplyDeleteI knew the whole running out of oxygen in a huge tunnel was BS but they only have 1 hour to get things done so whatever.
ReplyDeleteTwo thumbs up for Rachel stabbing Jaffe. However, I would have been happier had she stabbed him in the carotid artery and watched him bleed out.
ReplyDeleteDefinitely! You'd think they'd have learned that lesson by now, but apparently not!
ReplyDeleteGreat Review!
ReplyDeleteI loved the episode because of it's empirical exploration. I think Charlie's hallucination was a bit more than that, as it definitely sets her apart spiritually, and I think is most important point of the episode. I'm not one to pick apart specifics of air tight verses something else (which perhaps what happened to them was something else than just a lack of oxygen. Something bigger and fate orientated?!). I'm also ok with not understanding the quantum mechanics behind the electricity. I know we'll get an explanation eventually and am enjoying the ride, especially these past 3 episodes!
I agree the four month hiatus is a mistake, but I am hoping the fan base is strong enough to remember to come back. -Agree and also felt the weight of Wizard of Oz, but found it in relation to Nora's hallucination paralleling Maggie's death (Animal bite), Maggies final experiences, and Charlie's role there in "The Plague Dogs" and then in Charlie's own vision sequence! -But nice connection to the door opening parallel! :D
Disagree a little Charlie's experience IMO was an allusion to "Stairway to Heaven". -I'm inclined to think, with her experience especially, that what happened to her/them was meant to be something "bigger" spiritually. In other episodes Charlie has been there to comfort those passing on and protects children. She's like a prophet or a St. in some sense. For Bad Robot, these kinds of things are often explored and alluded to...Because I have yet to see most of Supernatural, I don't exactly know what Kripke and his production team/writers explored in relation to that, as all I know is that much like Fringe and Once Upon a Time, there are different planes/realities to go to and fight on based on mythological and spiritual things....but I'm wondering in Supernatural if their are types of spiritual healers or Shaman in it's mythos, and if so, do you guys see traces of it with Charlie?
ReplyDeleteit's an awful series I'm watching because of the series "The Event" last year, which was also awful but got really hilarious.
ReplyDeleteYou could well be right, but I hope not, as I tend to prefer my SF to be free of mysticism, though there are exceptions. The Supernatural universe is of course a fantasy/horror one, so the mystical has more of a place there--to my taste, anyway--as it does in Once upon a Time and did in Lost, but I confess that when Fringe gets mystical I don't much care for it. Some excellent Supernatural episodes take place essentially inside the heads of characters--as in an episode about a creature that can invade your dreams, or in the death of [name removed to avoid spoilers] episode, here we watch the character's memories disintegrate as consciousness fades.
ReplyDeleteThere are mystical/magical beings in Supernatural with all kinds of abilities, but Shamanism... I'm not recalling any off the top of my head, and there's nothing spiritual healer-like in the show's protagonists. Rev resembles Supernatural more in how it makes family dynamics and conflict a central element.
Thanks for the explanation Abrams too has family be at the center of conflict often. In Lost it's indirectly reflected in each character's past and acts as the proper motivations of a lot of the character's including Jack's. In Fringe and Alias it is more direct as the characters wrestle with their family members on a day to day basis. It's just Abrams often uses spirituality in order home in emotionally on multiple-universe dynamics which amplifies the family-dynamic aspect as 'fate' could be rendered like DNA in a family tree of time lines/multiple universes. Bad Robot IMO realizes that we all live for things and we find meaning in things, so it uses various philosophies, theologies, and/or spiritual references in order to be make it realistic in the sense that having faith in something (people, places, things) is a big part of human identity, and isn't confined to any one ideology or idea (although Eastern Philosophy is often highlighted, as it goes along better with multiple universe/ coming to terms with one's self quantum mechanics)
ReplyDeleteI think the two (Kripke and Abrams) have a lot in common which is way I think this idea (Revolution) is a good fit, but even going back to names like "Grace", "Sebastian", "Aaron", and Neville's speech when burying the militia member in the corn field (The Plague Dogs), and the idea of re-creating an America (that never really was), points to 'The American Dream' and a deeper spiritual underbelly.
Just responding to a couple of your posts above. As show runner, I think it likely that we are getting more of Kripke's view. In many interviews, he has stressed family just as that - not a spiritual connection. Supernatural does include angels, demons and a view of heaven, but again, it is not supposed to be any specific religion/belief system as such. Charlie's interaction with Ben - having to go back, not being able to stay where it is "safe" - is almost exactly the way heaven and its alternatives are presented in a number of Supernatural episodes. It's about free will and obligations. It's not about the higher spiritual power - certainly there isn't an emphasis on mysticism as there was on say Lost. While I don't have an objection to there being a spiritual element to characters' motivations, I will be very disappointed if the mysteries are solved with mystic mumbo-jumbo. Also, if you are familiar with the Wizard of Oz, and the fact that it comes up a lot in Kripke's other 'verse, that scene with her waking on the couch and then having a voice pull her back to reality is a _dead_ parallel - just no question in my mine whatsoever.
ReplyDeleteIn the end, while it's fun to see these reflections from other works, I think it does, on some level, do a real disservice to the show you're watching - ie Revolution - to read too much of these other elements in.
Tim Guinee has now twittered it was more than a hallucination.
ReplyDeleteAdditionally Kripke originally wanted things that Abrams didn't and compromises where made:
"But Abrams didn’t like Kripke’s apocalyptic device for wiping out modern conveniences. Kripke originally wanted to have the country depopulated by a super virus. But that was deemed too familiar, too much like Stephen King’s The Stand. Instead, Abrams suggested an idea his company had been kicking around: Surviving the fallout of a nationwide blackout."
http://insidetv.ew.com/2012/11/12/revolution-pitch/
I think they will continue to compromise since Abrams is producing. Even this episode shared a connection with Alias "The Passage Pt 2." -Sydney, Jack, and Irina where in KASHMIR walking across a field of LANDMINES. (Led Zeppelin's song Kashmir is about a road or passage and illumination) IMO it's a disservise to not take a closer look, when the writers have taken the time to make the show philosophically interesting. I'm in no way saying that it will be as mystical as Lost, but rather that "belief" and dealing with death and grief is a driving factor for Charlie in particular. -You don't write a drama centered around a revival of America (or humanity) and not make it a spiritual journey, because beliefs in anything good can be perceived as spiritual since they change you or enlighten you to new truths about yourself and/or the world around you. Abrams wouldn't tell a story with out meaning, because that's just what he and Bad Robot do.
Man, I hope he was kidding about it being more than a hallucination....
ReplyDeleteI doubt it. A tagline of the series is "Hope will light the way" That's a pretty simple, but spiritual way to promote Utopian ideals. Her hallucination was full of light and peace...unlike the other three's
ReplyDeleteIf it wasn't just an hallucination and this show's gonna offer up some sort of mystical level, I'll be bailing on it. I prefer my SF to be rationalist/materialist.
ReplyDeleteThat tweet doesn't sound like a confirmation of anything to me. COULD be a hallucination, COULD be something else--sounds like a tease to me.
Hmm. I'd be pretty hesitant about reaching any conclusions about our female Charlie based on a male Charlie in a different show. could be connections, I suppose, but I'll need a lot more to go on....
The implication that he didn't just smile and say thanks or offer some other kind of resolution to the question, but instead made a point to address the hallucination implies we are to rethink Charlie's experience.
ReplyDeleteI'd differentiate between what those in a pre-technological culture might make of, say, a plane, and what we--the audience--know about it. Arthur C. Clarke is of course correct that "Any technology sufficiently advanced is indistinguishable from magic," but I'd add that "indistinguishable from" is not "the same as." There is some mystical/spiritual SF I quite like--Miller's A Canticle for Leibowitz comes to mind, as does Russell Hoban's Riddley Walker--but, as a rule, I prefer SF that might float a mystical/spiritual possibility but ends up rationalizing it as well within the rules of the physical universe as we understand them or can reasonably imagine them as being. Robert J. Sawyer's Calculating God is a good example of this.
ReplyDeleteI like parallel/multiple world stories, but if you posit parallel/multiple worlds in which the same laws of science that apply to ours don't apply, then you're in fantasy, not SF. (NOt that there's anything wrong with that; I like fantasy.) I've taken Revolution as SF, given the concept, the general history of how post-apocalyptic narratives approach that concept, and the absence of anyhting nthat struck me as mystical fron amy episode so far (and I'd argue that nothing in the "Kashmir" episode requires a mysticla explanation, tohugh I certainly respect the opinion of someone who does see mystic possibility there).
By contrast, works like Radcliffe's Mysteries of Otranto, which are in the gothic tradition and spend much of their time playing up the supernatural/horror potential, opnly to rationalize it all at the end, irk me equally. I guess I just like my generic lines not to be blurred! (Much as I enjoyed Lost, for instance, its blending of SF and fantasy was less than satisfactory to me, and the whole happy afterworld ending of it was--to me--very disappointing.)
As for the tweet, certainly not responding or just saying thanks would not invite any speculation. However, he also didn't say "it wasn't a hallucination," he just teased: "r u sure it's a hallucination?" It might imply that he wants us to rethink Charlie's experience, but he might well want us to do that because fans eagerly speculating about teased-out possibilities generates good buzz and therefore is a good tactic for keeping them interested. Doesn't mean we'll end up learning that in fact there really is some light-drenched afterworld/sideworld/otherworld where the dead live on, or where parallel versions of them exist, a la Fringe, before they retconned Walternate and co out of existence (I assume they have done so, anyway, since there's been no parallel world stuff so far this final season). Doesn't mean we WON'T learn that, either--but if we do learn it, I hope we learn that it's some sort of rationalized parallel universe, not some heavenlike spirit world. If it's the latter, I'll be very disappointed.
I think in genre's past differences between sci-fi and fantasy are as you state, but I think in more recant fiction the lines of those genre's are becoming blurred as you can say magic synonymous to various kinetics and/or knoetic science and/or supernatural phenomena.
ReplyDeleteFor instance, Fringe is more science fiction because it has "physical" tech, than Once Upon A Time which comes off more as fantasy but if you take away the 'tech' aesthetic in Fringe you can see the shows share a great deal themes and conceptual ideas.
His Dark Materials for instance, is considered both science fiction and fantasy because it comprises of all of those things...but like those two TV shows it's not really about the genres in which the work lie, but rather they are deep philosophical dramas that highlight the choices humanity makes, which is further extended with the "tools" that humanity uses, as everything we "use" comes from the pursuit of (and a belief in the pursuit of) knowledge to continue make and/or use tools in the name of those beliefs in trying to find any given justification to any given belief. (right of passage/ the 'better' way to live-->philosophy)
Kashmir Tourism - Kashmir is a land of myriad seasons and it changes the hues of landscape with the seasons. Burgeoning with magnificent scenery, unique experience in Houseboat staying, Shikara riding, Mughal Gardens, floating vegetable Gardens and host of adventure activities, this enchanting valley is always lavishly beautiful and a favored destination for tourists from all walks of life.
ReplyDelete