Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Supernatural 8.04: Smitten by "Bitten"


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Supernatural 8.04: Smitten by "Bitten"

25 Oct 2012

Share on Reddit

Episode 4 of season 8, “Bitten”, marks yet another episode of the series to break the “rules” of both standard television fare and the series itself. Robbie Thompson has written a brilliantly backwards and inside out version of the show. Thomas R Wright must have had hours and hours more film than normal to sift through to edit the episode, but the final product was well worth it. I hope that “hardcore” Supernatural fans will really give this episode its due, even though it is undeniably Sam and Dean-lite. Those who know me, may actually be surprised at how much I liked this episode, but one of the things I like best about Supernatural is its willingness to take chances. While the core of the show is the brothers’ relationship, it’s also about what it means to be a monster and also about the relationship between hunter and hunted and civilization and outsider. This episode focuses more on those themes.

            The episode opens normally enough with some close up shots of bloody walls. We then see Dean and Sam bust into the room, guns drawn, only to discover the dead bodies and a computer with a sticky note on it asking “play me.” Luckily for us, they do and that footage provides the body of the episode. The boys are the framing players in this one and we see the story play out from the monster’s perspective. Now, this gives us a different look at the hunter/hunted relationship, but given Dean’s willingness to let Kate go at the end of the episode, I think it’s safe to say that the brothers have also gained a new perspective. This also provides a little more context and closure to two episodes last season that were contentious among fans at best: “The Girl Next Door” and “Slice Girls”. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the monster that is the subject of spare or slay is also a woman here.  

            The found footage on the computer was shot mainly by the actors themselves and they did an amazing job. The shakey handheld video images which aren’t nicely framed and often give us the action that we may not want to watch – you know that feeling when you want the ability to turn the camera to someone else? We get lots of shots that only show us part of someone’s face. All of this serves to underscore the feelings of the kids themselves as they slowly learn what’s going on and what it’s done to all of them and as they learn about each other.

            So much of this episode helps to frame the self-discovery of these kids. I really liked the placement of the where do you want to be in five years footage. Seeing it before, their ambitions to be a lawyer (echos of Sam!!!), to work for HBO, to be on a boat seem to be normal and possible. They also seem like doable goals for these kids. Seeing the same footage afterwards simply underscores how badly life can treat you even if you aren’t born a hunter. Kate’s final words that “We don’t get to choose who we are” and that “Michael wasn’t always a monster” resonate not only with the audience, but also with the brothers. I don’t think the choice of Michael for the name of one of the characters can be ignored either. Is there also a possible link to Benny through the boat?

            The pop culture references in the episode also hit home for me, especially Brian referring to Sam and Dean as Starsky and Hutch, though realistically that is likely before the kids’ time. The Rizzoli and Isles comment seemed more likely, and we also get the kids questioning the relationship between the brothers, something we haven’t seen for a while... yes. I miss those jokes... We also got shout outs to The X-Files – “maybe he was bit by an alien” – and then when the FBI are investigating they speculate that Mike is an X-file.

            I very much appreciated the overlay of Lord of the Flies. Is there anyone who wasn’t forced to read it in high school? It’s a wonderful look at how people can do things that they normally wouldn’t when pressured by society or the simple need to survive. It’s also a cautionary tale about being seduced by power. And I wonder how this may play out in relation to Dean’s time in Purgatory. Nobody wants to be Piggy – the character who is bullied and killed in the novel. Everyone wants to be Ralph, the popular kid. The scene where Brian confesses to Kate that he loves her and doesn’t want to be Piggy is heartbreaking. In fact, I think all three guest stars, Brandon Jones as Michael, Leigh Parker as Brian, and Brit Sheridan as Kate, did a fantastic job.

            I will quibble with the mythology a bit in this episode. I thought we had learned before that werewolves couldn’t eat animal hearts to survive and that they essentially completely lost their humanity when they changed. Having the professor, be close to, but not the alpha, didn’t really help to solve these issues for me. In a show that is as tightly written as Supernatural is, I am always a little disappointed when they don’t stick closely to established mythology – a standard I wouldn’t hold many shows to admittedly. I did really enjoy the scene in which Dean and Sam kill the professor. The way it was shot reminded me of the scene in “Born Under a Bad Sign” that captures “Sam” on tape killing Steve Wandell. I don’t think there’s a parallel in the action, but the framing and quality of the shots are a nice echo of the surveillance footage. On the other hand, having the brothers accept Kate’s promise not to kill her because she hasn’t yet killed anyone and can survive without ever killing someone is consistent. Dean might reflect on his ability to resist drinking blood when turned into a vamp. And in “The Girl Next Door” Amy has already killed. There are no girls on the island in Lord of the Flies, so this may also be a reason why she’s the one able to survive.

            The end of the episode brings us back to Sam and Dean – and Kate heading off on a lonely existence as a monster fugitive. I have to admit that I thought I’d somehow missed the credits until they played at the end of the episode. Supernatural has a great history in playing with their credits and title cards and this is no exception. Placing the credits here really underscored that this is usually the place where we would enter the story.

            There was a lot to appreciate and like about this episode. I know that a lot of fans will be upset about the lack of Sam and Dean in the episode, but I’m hoping that after the initial distress wears off, the majority will be able to appreciate the fine work done in this episode by the entire cast, crew, and production team. I’m looking forward to hearing about the references I may have missed in the episode and how you see the themes explored in the episode playing out against the backdrop of this season. While I want to know what you think, please try to keep your comments positive – or at least not just “not enough Sam and Dean”...

            My last thoughts this week? I’m so excited for our next episode which airs on Holloween! Is there a more fitting night of the year for Supernatural?

24 comments:

  1. Nice to see someone's not critizing the episode as most of the fans are.
    Personally, as much as I missed Dean&Sam, I admire SPN creators for trying again do sth new. Thought it was pretty well done! Just wish I felt more invested in these characters' story. I didn't really liked them that much. But I loved the end of the recording. "Give me a chance" part got to me. I loved that they DID give it to her. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I actually really enjoyed this review. I had written the episode off completely at first, but after reading your comparison to Lord of the Flies I could appreciate it more. I still won't be re-watching this anytime soon, mainly because I'm not a fan of "found footage" style episodes, but there's no doubt that the crew did a fantastic job putting this together.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This was a lot of the reason I didn't care for the episode either. I can get over it being "Sam and Dean lite", but I never became invested enough in the kids to enjoy it. I do give the whole Supernatural team credit for stepping a bit farther outside the box, though.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like how the credits were not only at the end rather than the beignning, but also ran literally backwards--ending rather than beginning with the star's names; interesting paratextual (paravideo?) tak eon how the episode itself turns things upside down and backwards. I thought it was a noble attempt, this episode, and that they did a pretty good job of trying to make the three college kids more than just stereotypes in the 45 or so minutes available to them--no mean feat, and though they didn't quite succeed (the nerd/geek kid needed more nuance), they took a great shot at it. And hey, *I* would have much preferred being Piggy than any of the other rats in LotF (of course, since I more or less was, anyway, I guess that isn't saying much).

    ReplyDelete
  5. I completely agree with your review and am glad to find someone who enjoyed it for what it was. I believe it was a story that needed to be told. We all see Sam and Dean through our own goggles, but there are some things coming down the pike that they needed to be very clear on.
    The boys, as far back as season 3 with Lenore and Gordon, have struggled with the question of whether evil is inherent in the monster or the monster chooses to be evil. Before they ran into the vamps that were surviving on cow blood, they believed (or at least Dean did) exactly what they'd always been taught -- that all monsters were evil and needed to be killed. But like he said at the end of "Hunted", that case jacked everything up. How many monsters had they killed that didn't deserve it? As it turned out, the human, Gordon, was more the monster, not the vampires who were just trying to survive without killing.

    Which brings us to Jack, the rugaru. Sam was adamant that they not kill him until he'd done something to kill his for. Dean and Travis didn't believe he could resist his nature, but Dean gave him a chance because Sam asked. Jack was subsequently pushed into the act of killing to save his wife and unborn child -- an act many humans would also perform under the same circumstances. Did that complete his transformation into a monster? Yes. Did that make him evil? Not necessarily. Killing to protect your loved ones is as much a human reaction as killing to survive is. Sam didn't kill Jack until he had to to save Dean.

    Amy was a huge controversy but it also serves to show how Dean's perspective has changed over the years. He no longer believes what his father taught him. He killed Amy, and seemed sorry he had to, but it was simply because she had killed 4 people. She had crossed the line and despite her promise to Sam, Dean couldn't take the chance she wouldn't -- under the same circumstances -- do it again. But her son hadn't killed and Dean let him go. So it was established then that Dean's line had shifted closer to where Sam's was and further from his father's.

    Now we have Kate, and by some extension, Benny to come. I think Carver felt they needed to drop an anvil and make the Winchesters position very clear in order to make what was coming down the pike understandable. They wanted no confusion as to where the line in the sand was as far as Dean's view on evil and monsters. He has changed over the years, at first to appease Sam, but then because of his own experiences and conscience. Sam jumped at the chance to let Kate go, grabbing the laptop and hurrying out the door, obviously eager to move on before Dean could change his mind. He wasn't about to question his brother, even if Dean's reaction was somewhat of a surprise. He was ready to hunt Kate down if Dean said they had to, but was very happy to let her go. I see Kate as a parallel to Madison, another werewolf that didn't ask for it, but had it thrust upon her. Madison asked them to kill her, Kate asked them to let her live. In both cases they did as the monster asked because they saw them as victims as well as monsters. The scene you mentioned of the kids telling the camera where they saw themselves in 5 years was for that specific purpose -- to highlight that they were victims. They had dreams and hopes that they lost through no fault of their own. I'm even willing to let the mythology go since I am not an expert on werewolves. I'll go with what they tell me is true.

    All in all, I believe in this case, both Winchesters have behaved well within the characteristics set for them through out the years. They are evolving just like real people do and I applaud the writers for sticking to those characterizations even when parts of a very vocal fandom lash out against them. With the Purgatory story-line and Benny's involvement on the horizon, I still firmly believe Dean is doing what his conscience dictates and his instincts haven't let me down yet.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wow! Thanks for that! I love how many episodes you were able to bring in to show that struggle they've had in deciding what it is that needs killing and what it is that makes a monster. Great response - thanks for taking the time to write in such detail!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thanks so much - I don't think I could get a better response to a review. A huge part of me watches for the "scenery" too, but if there isn't a plot, I'm just not interested. I'll admit that I likely won't watch this episode as often as I've watched some of the others, but I really like what they did with this one. One of the reasons that I find myself fascinated with the show and re-watching episodes so often is because the episodes really are layered. I always notice something new in the plot or some other connection to a previous or following episode in addition to seeing some other nuance in the boys' performances. Thanks for the comment!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I confess I had a real problem with Dean killing Amy but NOT killing the kid. I mean, what option but to kill people will the kid have, now that his mortitian mom's dead and he can't get dead-folk pituitaries any more? Who's he going to go to, exactly? Either Dean or the writers didn't really think that one through well enough, and I'm inclined to think it was the writers--or perhaps the writers realizing that having Dean off the kid would probably push him way off the scale on the no sympathy meter (the only thing worse than killing a kid is killing a dog) so just fudging it and hoping nodoby' notice them stuck there in the corner they'd written themselves into....

    ReplyDelete
  9. I wonder if this is a problem with the fact we only have about 40 minutes tops to get to like them or whether they were deliberately a little unlikeable so that it made the choices harder. I mean it would theoretically be easier to kill someone who you didn't like and who was obviously evil, right? I found that I liked Mike a lot more as we got to see more of him and Brian less. But it was definitely not until the end that I really felt anything for Kate...

    ReplyDelete
  10. Did we watch the same episode? It was borderline funny because I'm sure it appeals to the younger audience who enjoy watching teen dramas such as Twilight. For me it was just boring and repetitive. Was it supposed to be funny or scary? I almost fell asleep halfway through, when the kids were screaming at each other.


    I refuse to try to find deeper meanings in badly written episodes. They can write such brilliant stories that don't get boring no matter how many times you watch the episodes. This is not one of them.

    ReplyDelete
  11. nellymendezcolon25 October 2012 at 23:18

    I am agree with you this review is a little bit ..OFF..some episode are bad but you enjoy the story line example..(GHOST FACER) ..BUT THESE ONE ..UYYYYY,.,UYYYY..all the concept was so poor.,flat if almost get dizzy watching on the tv set if a saw it in my lap-top I WILL THROW UP.....

    ReplyDelete
  12. I almost fell asleep during it too

    ReplyDelete
  13. I never thought I'd say this, but I'd rather have watched a Ghostfacers episode than this cheap horror flick.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Thank you. I was getting tired of reading so many "I don't likes" about this episode. I loved it. I thought it was unique, well thought out, well written, and incredibly well acted.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Great review. I also enjoyed this episode and thought it was very well done. Nice to see others also looking at the right side of this week and not just seeing all the flaws.
    And I'm also excited to have an episode on Halloween. Lets hope it's extra scary. We haven't had a truly scary episode in a long time

    ReplyDelete
  16. nellymendezcolon26 October 2012 at 00:14

    ..darling the last episode was a re-run of on mystery program..GALLERIA.NOCTURNA..(night-gallery)...there was transmitted vey late night they play spooky terror movie but instead of scream make me laugh so hard,.WELL ACTED...???...UNIQUE..???..WELL WRITTEN...???..Ghost facer episode was so much better in all areas.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Dean did ask him if he had someone to go to, and the kid nodded yes, so I doubt Dean thought too much further than knowing the kid would be taken care of for the time being. He was just a kid. He did tell him if he killed, he'd have to come after him. He also invited the kid to come after him for vengeance if he decided to when he grew up -- if Dean was still alive. Dean didn't want to kill Amy, he really didn't want to kill the kid. Sometimes the job just sucks. :/

    ReplyDelete
  18. I really get the sense that this episode might actually have been too "smart" for some people. I'm hoping that people will give it a second look.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Thanks so much! It really wasn't a huge stretch for me to find the good things to say about this episode. I always wonder about the "fans" who are determined to be negative. It's pretty obvious who really does watch for the plot!

    I really can't think of a better way to celebrate Halloween!

    ReplyDelete
  20. You're very welcome. :) I think a lot of fans react without looking past the surface, which in some respects is understandable seeing as how this is just a TV show -- entertainment -- and they want their respective hero to always be shown in a good light. Right now, I think Carver is going a bit deeper and forcing us to think instead of react. Some will, some won't. Either way, I love what he's doing and I love the way the season is shaping up so far. :)

    ReplyDelete
  21. I think its because they don'y kill kids.
    Like in Swap Meat, they tell the wanna-be witch kid [forgot his name] that if he was of voting age, they would kill him. The kid was pretty much a witch...

    ReplyDelete
  22. Yeah, but ... taken care of by someone who's gonna be feeding him human pituitaries. From where? Whoever he has to go to should be next on Dean's hunting list....

    ReplyDelete
  23. Not to mention, of all the monsters to let live, Kate was kind of a toolbag. She tries to convince herself that it was self-defense when Mike killed Scott despite Mike basically admitting it was murder. Then after hearing what the Prof. said about not being able to resist after eating a human heart she still defended him. Because they were in love. You're exactly right: Twilight nonsense.


    I don't think it was poorly acted but none of the "college" characters were particularly sympathetic. Kate was a love-sick moron(who wasn't even worthy of a last name apparently), Mike was a jerk, and Brian was pathetic.



    Some episodes deserve defending. This is not one of them.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I agree 100% with this review. I loved this episode. I know some people don't like these episodes but personally I always find them interesting and fun. Thanks for the review.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.