"THE CHILDREN'S CRUSADE"
11/05/2012 (10:01PM - 11:00PM) (Monday) : CHARLIE MUST CONVINCE MILES TO HELP A VILLAGE OF LOST CHILDREN - When Charlie (Tracy Spiridakos) meets a boy who's suffered a plight similar to her own, she relates and longs to help him and his young friends. First, she must convince Miles (Billy Burke). Meanwhile, Rachel (Elizabeth Mitchell) grows weary of General Monroe (David Lyons) as she meets someone from her past.
Zak Orth, JD Pardo, Maria Howell, Tim Guinee and Giancarlo Esposito also star.
Source: NBC


Is this the episode where Rachel meets up with her son?
ReplyDeleteCould be, but I would think we might see that sooner than this. (I would hope we wouldn't have to wait 2 episodes for that reunion, but I suppose we could)
ReplyDeleteGlad to see Grace will be back! Jeesh I want to know who the heck Randall is!
ReplyDeleteMaybe someone of her past is Grace not Danny. I think Rachel and Grace are known
ReplyDeleteYeah,if she has any motherly feelings? They could be a little err rusty to say the least!
ReplyDeleteMust every episode be Charlie convincing Miles of something? It's getting a little tiresome this late in the season.
ReplyDeleteHa! Well I disagree a little. Charlie basically raised Danny and acted as his protector. She also seems to be better with people around her own age. She almost has a touch of spiritual healer element, as she seems to really go out of her way to be and talk with people when they are close to death. IMO she just lacks some experience and really I think her biggest problem is her relationship with Miles...
ReplyDeleteHa! I would disagree too! When i asked you this was were Rachel meets up with her son,i stayed thinking Rachel not Charlie,while you went back to Charlie.ha wheres me head???? sorry! :P
ReplyDeleteOh! I apologize! Sorry I didn't realize! Ya, Rachel seems like she has some explaining to do!
ReplyDeleteHahaha we'll be okay,eventually! .P
ReplyDeleteI'm watching it again,to early for bed but my back is killing me,Hopefully it will take my mine off of it,
I feel like they meant "wary" and not "weary."
ReplyDelete