Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Breaking the Moonlighting Curse


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Breaking the Moonlighting Curse

17 Oct 2012

Share on Reddit
Every fiction has its own world, and its own rules. There are some TV shows that use the audience’s pop culture knowledge to their advantage and end up writing themselves around it. Castle is one of these shows.


The meta aspects of the show don’t stay within the show’s own world, they spread to homages, for example an episode about possible aliens honoring The X Files, or the recent ‘Murder He Wrote’. There’s also the satisfaction the audience gets when they see Castle and Beckett geeking over The Avengers, quoting Ghost Busters, mentioning Game of Thrones or watching Castle dressed as a space cowboy. It’s the feeling of knowing what they’re talking about, sharing something with the characters, that creates this satisfaction. It’s the same feeling at least I get when Leslie Knope talks about Hogwarts (if you don’t know who I’m talking about, watch Parks and Recreation, you won’t regret it, I promise). It makes the characters feel closer, blurring the lines between fiction and reality and we see glimpses of the Castle world beyond what the 42 minutes the episodes allows. 


Castle is not only a TV show; (I could quote Gilmore Girls and say ‘It’s a way of life’, but let’s keep my dorky side in check) It’s a story that has spread to different media creating a bond with the audience that doesn’t always happen. 

Is there a Moonlighting curse? For some shows you could say there is. It seems the will-they-won’t-they of the leading couple had been dragged out for so long, that not only are the procedural aspects forgotten or repeated, but that when they actually get together the spark they once had is gone. However even if it got frustrating at times, Castle knew when to drew the line. There were some episodes during season four that I won’t be rewatching any time soon, but season five is becoming a fan favorite. Faithful to the show’s roots and comical spirit, the love story plotline doesn’t mean there’s no story left to be told; quite the contrary, it only means the writers get to play with other sides of the characters and cases, as well as the actors. The discovery of these other sides is more than fun to watch. 

So with Castle there’s no curse, because you have a hard working group trying to deliver good television every week.The show as a whole laughs at itself, while having a bit of fun with itself, Castle gives a little wink here and there to the fans who in effect are also in on the laugh. Its not just about murder cases or a love story, but more about individuals with troubled pasts (including Castle, Beckett and also their immediate family at the 12th), making a difference, and all the while enjoying life as much as they can. Right now, it’s pretty good to be a Castle fan. 

41 comments:

  1. Congrats on your first article Laura!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Chuck broke the 'Moonlighting curse'.

    ReplyDelete
  3. thank you, ive always said with the right cast/crew/writers that anything resembling a curse can be avoided. If you have a group that likes to work together and writers who can write for that group then no curse. So Castle rules and I love these two characters together. Hopefully for 10 more years.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I know, but Castle was always shadowed by this curse, I didn't say this is the first show to break 'the curse'...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you for taking the time to comment!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank you. I always believed that when a show is well written, and the chemistry between the cast is there, there´s no such thing as a curse!! Castle always had it, the problem with Moonlighting was the bad writting and, above all, the fact that the 2 mains leaders couldn´t stand eachother.
    I loved Castle´s 4 seasons, but season 5 is so far amazing, and my favourite too:)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Really great article!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Very interesting points. Thanks for taking your time and posting them!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yes, Chuck really did, but the curse was always brought up when people talked about Castle.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Really good article ! congrats
    And I love your last line "right now it's pretty good to be a castle fan" , you're so right ! It was already before but right even more ! I'm so happy when I watch it
    I can't wait to see an other episode every week, this show is killing me and got me addicted lol

    ReplyDelete
  11. No show has a Moonlighting Curse on it because there is no Moonlighting Curse. There's a "Cybill Shepherd got pregnant" curse and a "Die Hard" curse, but any show that can't write for two characters who finally get together lack creativity and talent.


    Even Cub fans know their team just sucks. There's no Billy Goat, no Black Cat, and no Bartman.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I do agree with you. Half the episodes of season four seemed mired in season three, the other half showed the evolution of the C/B relationship,everyone was looking for. Season five is the fulfillment or rather the development Marlowe had promised. How it's being done is breathtaking and a joy to watch. There will be some intense episodes, but if 5.01 is an example, this should be the best season ever.

    ReplyDelete
  13. It was brought up with every show that had a couple who would they or won't they,not just with Castle..

    ReplyDelete
  14. Denise Maria Ribeiro Moreira17 October 2012 at 20:01

    "Right now, it’s pretty good to be a Castle fan". I agree with you totally. Thanks for all cast!

    ReplyDelete
  15. really nice article, and sooo true. thanks :) Caskett FTW!!!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Thank you! Great artikel I can´t agree with you more!!

    ReplyDelete
  17. And I´m tired of the Moonlighting curse, every Interview with Cast and Crew in the last few month the Interwiever asks about "The Curse"

    I hope thats stops now!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Great article, Laura! I think you're spot on.
    It's so refreshing, isn't it, when writers don't see "they got together" as the end of the story? So much truer to life, too: I've yet to see a real-world couple whose lives became LESS interesting than when they were single. Hell - my folks have been together nearly 50 years, and they still have plenty of drama (and plenty of spark) in their lives, and still learn new things about each other all the time. It may be HARDER to write, without the Will They/Won't They Insta-plot (just add UST), but as the Castle team are proving now, week by week, it can be just utterly satisfying when they get it right.

    May Caskett bury the Moonlighting Curse for good...

    ReplyDelete
  19. There isn't and never was any "Moonlighting curse", IMO. It's just an excuse of lazy writers so they can continue to be lazy.


    If there is a will they or won't they in a show, it's necessary to resolve it (one way or another), IMO, otherwise it gets repetitive and frustrating and boring and then just plainly bad. Dangling it as a bait in front of viewers works only so far and then the magic that once was there is lost (like in a real world, one should not wait too long) and things go downhill from there. So, IMO, every will they or won't they couple should organicaly get together after a while in a natural way that feels real and genuine (or end in some irrevocable way that feels genuine for the couple too). Even if ending the possibility of future relationship isn't something I would like to see, I would prefer that to having the relationship be stalled indefinitely without any hope of the writers (or, if you want, talentless hacks) ever going there (and no, putting the characters together in the last episode doesn't count for me at all, I want to see the relationship progress from the getting together onwards).


    For me even Castle pushed it. Season four as a whole was very bad, IMO, and the reason was stalling the relationship between Castle and Beckett. If they didn't get together at the end of last season, I would be on the verge of giving up on the relationship altogether. For me the ideal time to bring them together would have been the end of season two, season three at the latest. The horrible (stalling) cliche of Castle getting back together with Gina precisely at the moment Beckett wanted to confess her feelings for him was the first time I was disappointed in the Castle writers and the time they lost my full trust in them and their work.


    So, what I really want to say is this: I wish writers would go where the specific relationship organicaly takes them and wouldn't be afraid to go there. IMO, it would make their shows better. Sorry for the long post.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Thank you! I'm glad you liked it

    ReplyDelete
  21. Oh, don't be sorry!
    Thank you for taking the time to reply, you have a lot of valid points!
    I think we can't blame only the writers because we know the network has influence in the creative decisions, but they're together now, and it seems real and extremely fun to watch, I hope it stays that way.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Thank you for taking the time to comment

    ReplyDelete
  23. Good article, I also think the Moonlightning curse is just a cheap excuse to keep 2 ppl apart. It's imo sloppy writing/lack of creativity if you can't write a couple in a ''happy'' relationship together, without being able to keep it interesting.


    It's what I'm liking a lot about season 5, they've kept Castle and Beckett pretty close to who they were before, the bantering and bickering is still there, but it's on another level now, and I have to say SK and NF are on fire with the chemistry, it somehow got even better now that they put their characters together. No idea how they do it, but they are killing it.


    Bones for me pushed it way too far, but before Bones other shows sorta did the same. Infamous example for me would be JAG which didnt bring it's couple together until the last 2 minutes of the very last episode, I mean...really? lol The Castle solution is way more satisfying and gratifying, and I'm hoping we get a season 6 at the very least, the way it's going.


    Also thank you for your post, it was a great read.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Great article, fully agree with you.
    Castle has writers' strike, our writers really good and dedicate to our show.
    And the show creator Andrew Marlowe is amazing.
    They keep the character who they were before.
    It's really fun to watch Castle and Beckett being together, I really enjoy the ride so far.
    And your last line, I can't agree you more.
    It's pretty good to be a Castle fan.
    Thank for you to voice for all the Castle fans.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Castle is in my heart. It is funny and heart warming...the very best on TV.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Thank you for saying there is no curse. I was a huge MOONLIGHTING fan and what I thought it boiled down to was pregnancy and very bad writing. The writers couldn't come up with a decent storyline then throwing Mark Harmon into the mix was just plain ridiculous. The Castle writing has been exceptional for season five although I can't say the same for Bones. This latest season of Bones has been so disapointing, mediocre and disjointed I have given up watching... I'm happy to buy the series when it's finished and I'll figure out whether I want to watch it or add it to my collection. It could be that the show has run its course, in fact, I think five-six years is the average life of a tv series nowadays... anything over that and we consider it "same old, same old". Thank you for giving the me the opportunity to say what I've been dying to say for a long time.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Thank you for this! I couldn't agree more. And also I agree with ghani, that getting a couple together in the last episode does not count; seeing them together and developing the relationship is massively more interesting than angst and UST and lame excuses to repeatedly split them (see: Wyman's treatment of Peter and Olivia--and I'm the original Fringe fan.) I am so looking forward to funny, silly, strange, hot, smart, clever banter and scenes for seasons of Castle to come.

    ReplyDelete
  28. For me, personally, the only line is when two characters are in a field where fraternization is not allowed (i.e. both are cops, spies, or soldiers etc.) are teased as a romantic couple. It can't work. If they ever get together one or both must be transferred...and the show is over. Makes me nuts. But I''ve been okay with it on Castle because (as Rick so helpfully pointed ouot) he is not a cop. So I'm okay. Same with Bones. Brennen isn't in the FBI...so I'm still enjoying the right. Scully and Mulder...I stopped watching the show. (NOTE: I do not know hot this text turned red. :-)


    The Moonlighting Curse is, in my humble opinion, an excuse network executives (and some showrunners) use to avoid having to face the task of reshaping a show to work with the new paradigm. It's an excuse given to fans to justify dragging out (and replaying) the same will they or won't they courtship game beyond credibility. But if the writing staff gets the characters and puts in the effort to figure out how to make the adjustments and maintain the heart of the show (as they have on Castle) then it can be done.


    Or maybe it's just than when the Hollywood type talk about the curse they don't really understand what it is. The curse is NOT getting the couple together, it's having a writing staff that's not up to the job of making the show work just as successfully *after* they get the couple together.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I agree with you for the most part, except for one thing - I would love to see a show brave enough to deal with the consequences of an affair between two charcters that is forbidden. IMO, there are many ways to do so without ruining the show. On the contrary, since it's not being done very often (or at all) it can be refreshing.

    ReplyDelete
  30. For me it would have to depend on the setup of the show....if the writers had that in their minds from the start my odds of keeping an open mind would be higher. If it's done purely in response to fans wanting to take a good buddy/partner relationship to a love relations ship...it would be much much harder for me to give it a chance.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Very true. And I'm a Cubs fan, I should know.

    ReplyDelete
  32. TPTB had a pregnant actress and decided to make the leads lovers. One prob they hated each others guts and it was obvious so the fans couldn't accept them as lovers. It wasn't because they were lovers but because TPTB tried and failed to play fans for fools. It was so obvious they hated each other and that TPTB thought the fans were morons who'd go with whatever TPTB threw out even if it was complete dreck. They're doing the same with Bones. Thet sleep together out of grief, she gets preggers ('cause lead actress is knocked up) I get it but the fact that they went from flirting to Ozzie/Harriet o Ward/June so suddenly is simply not believable.

    ReplyDelete
  33. disqus_e3RKuohRWm8 November 2012 at 23:33

    Awesome article!! The Moonlighting curse only exists in shows that believe in it, and Castle clearly isn't one of them :) There is so much unique storytelling in them figuring out how to be a couple and they are off to a fantastic start!

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.