The second episode of Revolution, “Chained Heat,” saw a lot more balls put in play. The
series is having a nice slow build with a compelling balance of exposition and
action. This episode was nicely structured with parallel fight scenes, quests,
and flashback cuts. Eric Kripke again wrote the script that was directed by
Charles Beeson.
For those of us who are diehard Supernatural fans, we are getting many
of the same themes, especially about family, that were – and still are –
compelling about that show. When Rachel tells Charlie, “Be a big sister. Never
let go of Danny’s hand,” it echoes John’s charge to Dean to look after Sam.
Charlie even explains to Miles that “It’s my job to look out for him.” A
virtual quote from Dean Winchester in Supernatural
about his brother. We also see what
family is willing to do for one another. In flashback, we see that Rachel is
ready, willing, and able to kill to protect her family. As the scene cuts back
and forth between Rachel’s first kill (we assume) and Charlie’s first kill
(again, we assume), viewers can contrast their motives. The scene is wonderfully
paced to build tension, and the viewer isn’t sure that either Ben or Charlie
will be able to make the kill. I, for one, was surprised when it was Rachel who
pulled the trigger, but it certainly helps to provide a believable role model
for Charlie to be able to kill as well. Rachel kills to protect her kids from
starving. Charlie kills to both further the search for her brother but also
fight the injustice of the militia holding prisoners and using them like
slaves. In many ways, Ben and Rachel have sheltered their children from this
kind of violence and injustice. And in the process, have actually kept their children from being impervious to that violence and injustice. Characters like Miles, who have been living in the thick of it, don't even seem to register the violence all around them.
A continuing theme in Supernatural is that “family don’t end with blood,” and in this new
world without power, that theme is going to be even stronger. Already we have
seen the various tight-knit communities and allegiances that have sprung up in
the wake of the power going out. Tonight’s episode introduces us to the rebels
who are fighting the militia. Rebels? Seem like a Star Wars reference to anyone else?
As in the first episode, viewers are given a few
answers even while more questions are asked. Enough exposition is provided,
such as Maggie having children of her own whose only pictures are on her
useless iPhone and that the possession of a firearm by non-militia personnel is
punishable by death. But the episode doesn’t become mired in the exposition.
There are a couple of great swordfights in tonight’s episode, and the
flashbacks were also designed to keep us on the edge of our seats. This episode
also sees the beginning of a number of quests. Charlie and Miles appear to be
the ones going after Danny, except that they are waylaid and end up rescuing
Nora and seem likely to be side-tracked into joining up with the Rebels. Maggie
and Aaron decide to take the medallion back to Grace who has her own problems
with the very mysterious Randal.
This week’s episode provides a lot more depth to
the characters. We see the layers pulled back a little from Captain Neville as
he comforts one of his men who is dying. We are given a little of what
motivates him to support the Militia with the promise of more backstory to
come. It will be interesting to see if he really is the brutal murderer that Danny sees him as. I trust Kripke to keep that promise as the story unfolds. As already pointed out, we also see more of
what motivates Maggie and Charlie.
There were a few parts of the plot in this week’s
episode that did seem a bit contrived, such as Charlie sneaking off at night to
join her uncle. And while the sword fights are brilliantly choreographed and shot - allowing us to see most of the action, not just quick cuts - it is NBC-bloodless, which is a little disappointing. There doesn't have to be a completely realistic amount of blood, but no blood?
There were also early pay off surprises like Rachel showing
up in the current timeline, an apparent prisoner of Monroe. When Charlie slips
and falls and is almost captured by “Nate”, my initial reaction was that the
scene wasn’t particularly well acted and was seemingly forgetting that Charlie
was supposed to be a good hunter. However, Charlie turns the tables and
captures “Nate.” This was a nice little wake up call to remember to trust
Kripke to remember his own story.
We also see a lot of an Abrams’ signature mystery
a la Fringe or Lost. We’ve got Grace sending messages to someone on that old
computer. Aaron is convinced now that the power went out and stayed out because
of some human intervention. I’ve been intrigued by the title card’s scrolling
between Evolution and Revolution, and I’m convinced that it is
significant. Perhaps the power being taken away is linked to someone wanting to
evolve society in a particular direction – to make people value the simple
things in life more, to take the country back to a simpler time – or at least
make them easier to subjugate by dividing them and keeping them isolated from
one another?
Next week sees a Supernatural AND Lost alumni
join the cast with the exceptionally talented Mark Pellegrino. Lots of
questions are being asked. Sound off in the comments below. What are your
theories on the title sequence? Who is Randal? Where are those mysterious
messages going?


I'd also like to point out another continuing theme from Supernatural: Calling the bad guy "Chuckles". I love the little moments that make you go "Yep, definitely Kripke."
ReplyDelete2-3 paragraphs on SPN to talk about another show using the same themes as half a dozen of others.... really now?
ReplyDeleteCharles Beeson great director. He worked in SPN too.
ReplyDeletesame showrunner.
ReplyDeleteRevolution gives me too many Supernatural's feelings. I don't know if I like it or not. I see the shadows of my Winchesters anywhere :')
ReplyDeletePoint taken! I'm a big fan of Kripke and Supernatural, so those things really jump out at me. Did you like the episode? Why or why not - what jumped out at you?
ReplyDeleteYes! I was trying not to make it all about Kripke and SPN - :) There are a few other names you might recognize in the credits...
ReplyDeleteI think depending on what you're an expert/fan of you see different themes. I don't see any of the Kripke stuff because I don't watch Supernatural, and many of the above-mentioned things belong to JJ Abrams shows, especially Alias. There's a lot of the Alias approach on this show, especially in the flashback/present time storytelling and in the final twists and in the fight scenes. Charlie is the equivalent of Sydney and family, or rather, lack thereof, is a big parallel with Sydney, who always struggled with it. Obviously many differences as well, but still. Depending on what one is an expert of, they can see different themes and parallels. I see this one as very much of a JJ Abrams show. Going by the above, it also has the stamp of Kripke, as it should be. So it's probably the right 50-50 mix of Kripke and Abrams.
ReplyDeleteI think we might be reaching a bit when we ascribe things like "family themes" or "flashbacks" or "rebel forces" to one director or story. Family has been a major theme in drama for centuries. All 'revolutions' have rebel forces, and flashbacks is one of those things they tell you not to rely on in film school because it is so overdone (and frequently poorly). IMO we should be careful, pointing to general well-used ideas and loosely tying them to other shows.
ReplyDeleteSee?? I knew Rachel was Alive! It's so so good! I'm happy now. Excited and impatient for the next!
ReplyDeleteThanks for the review! -Star Wars is also a really nice double reference for fans of either Abrams or Kripke, as Fringe and Lost both occasionally reference them too! -Even Randall's "electric shock prod" could be dubbed 'Light Saber" My guess is that it is Mr. Pellegrino playing Randall and that it might Reference Stephen King's Randall "Flagg", considering Pelligrino's Lost character rivaled another King character reference "The Man in Black", and despite that, M.P. tends to play antagonistic characters in general, like Lucifer.
ReplyDelete