Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon White Collar - Episode 3.16 - Judgment Day - 3 Sneak Peeks
Sign Up


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Get In Touch
 Join SpoilerTV
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

White Collar - Episode 3.16 - Judgment Day - 3 Sneak Peeks

25 Feb 2012

Share on Reddit





-
Sign Up for the SpoilerTV Newsletter where we talk all things TV!

20 comments:

  1. klutzy_girl25 February 2012 at 12:29

    So excited for this!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Justine Kubica25 February 2012 at 12:44

    Gosh! I can't stand Kramer! Good luck, Neal! Hold on!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dovilė Nariūnaitė25 February 2012 at 12:45

    Can't wait to see episode!

    ReplyDelete
  4. laura334125 February 2012 at 13:01

    Can't wait to see if Neal becomes anklet free...Still not sure if Peter is going to bat for him,not if it affects his position at work?

    ReplyDelete
  5. chestal25 February 2012 at 13:15

    Can't wait!! this is gonna be great!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Krista Crim25 February 2012 at 16:16

    I think something will come up during the episode and Peter will think the best way to protect Neal is to keep him in anklet so he'll give a bad testimony. This could cause some friction between the two.

    ReplyDelete
  7. spartigus1525 February 2012 at 17:00

    oh Neal being extra smooth with the chick in charge of his interview.  Doubt that will work playa.

    ReplyDelete
  8. laura334125 February 2012 at 17:15

     Oh yes it would cause friction between them

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dahne25 February 2012 at 18:16

    Peter admits that he is covering for Neal.  That surprises more than anything else.  Well that and Neal didn't look carefully at the witness list so Mozzie has to point out Kramer on there for him.  That does not compute in any scenario.  Got to admit.  I am looking more forward to how this whole thing goes sideways than the results of the hearing.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Helen Callahan26 February 2012 at 00:16

    I doubt that a decision about the anklet will be made if Kramer cracks the letters code.  He wants Neal in jail.  I think that Neal will escape after giving back the Raphael to Sara, and we will be left hanging about how Peter can straighten out the whole mess next season.  I would have loved the season to end nice for once, and for Neal to be free to decide whether to stay with Peter or not.  But I doubt that will happen.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Annie B.V.26 February 2012 at 02:21

    Yeah, I can't help but think that "worse worst case scenario" is the one we're most likely to see.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Bruce_F27 February 2012 at 20:52

     Agreed.  Being slick probably doesn't work with what is basically a glorified parole board.  Humble is what he should have went for.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Bruce_F27 February 2012 at 20:57

     "Peter admits that he is covering for Neal.  That surprises more than anything else."

    I don't know.  Peter didn't tell Neal about Kramer breaking his code and now this leads me to believe that Peter may not want Neal of his anklet but he doesn't want Neal to think he's the bad guy in all this either.  I think Peter may be consciously or subconsciously encouraging Kramer to ruin Neal's commutation hearing.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Dahne27 February 2012 at 22:48

    Trust me.  Peter and Kramer are not on the same side.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Bruce_F27 February 2012 at 22:58

     I have no doubts about that.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Helen Callahan27 February 2012 at 23:03

    I agree.  I think Kramer is jealous of all that Peter has accomplished and would like to show him up by catching Neal for all the crimes he got away with.

    ReplyDelete
  17. spartigus1527 February 2012 at 23:59

     is he even capable of being humble? lol

    ReplyDelete
  18. Bruce_F28 February 2012 at 00:03

     He's a con man.  He's capable of faking it.  :)

    ReplyDelete
  19. spartigus1528 February 2012 at 00:04

    lol indeed 

    ReplyDelete
  20. lsbloom28 February 2012 at 02:33

    I love that the last words of the clip are "you're free to go." Oh if that would be so.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.