UPDATE: just fixed the format of the post title. It was originally going to have more shows, but obviously that would've been a very longwinded post.
I've heard mixed opinions about this season. Some say it's better than ever, and some say it's completely gone off the rails. I've felt nothing but positive things about this season, but I've got a few things that I could nitpick at here and there. The reasons I tend to keep my mouth shut when watching Fringe, and reading here on SpoilerTV is a mystery even to me. You'd think the biggest mystery sci-fi show on television would have me blabbing for hours but it doesn't seem that way. It's strange to me, but I don't have many theories about what will happen very often. Sometimes I automatically try to figure out "What is going on here!" and sometimes I'm proven correct, but I hardly ever post my thoughts on where they will go because I just feel like it's not worth it. I feel like I would rather just cut myself off and not overthink things, and just quietly waste away until the next episode and hope for more answers as well as bigger questions. Fringe has had a strange effect on me! I also tend to ignore other people's theories for how things will turn out (a lot of them over the years have been awful, and make me thankful for the writers/producers we have on the actual team!) and they also seem like a waste of time. So what I'm saying is, Fringe makes me obsess about it in my head, and keep my thoughts to myself on what will happen! This is extremely unlike my tendencies with other shows, namely Supernatural, where I post ad nauseum about each and every little thing. Therefore, writing this review feels odd actually.
That was just a thought I had, when I started writing this review. We've seen the first 7 episodes of the 4th season, and so far it's been a very interesting ride. From what I understand, we've been collectively screwed over regarding the mid-season finale since 4x08 was supposed to be the finale and has been lauded by insiders of the show as "season finale material" if I remember correctly. However, back onto what we HAVE seen this season.
The strength of season 4 has been most undoubtedly the casting and acting, in my opinion. The scripts of course have been as strong as ever, but in lieu of a grand over-arching story like a pending war between worlds like we've had before, now we have a simple "where is Peter Bishop?" storyline. At first it was the job of the season to establish itself without Peter, and to establish a sense of longing in each of the main characters for what they lack in Peter's absence. They have brought out the best in Anna Torv and John Noble once again by shifting their characters around to be yet another version of themselves. Walter is absolutely tragic this season, as we know now that he's lost Peter not once, but twice, and at the same time he still caused the anguish that spans both universes, therefore ending the lives of hundreds of thousands without anything to show for it. It's no wonder that when he begins to see a man in reflections of everything around him that he's so quick to lobotomize himself. Olivia is cold, detached and sometimes downright frightening at the beginning of the season. We learn that she's not very emotional at all, and in the past she has successfully killed her step-father for his abusive tendencies. There are traces of our Olivia circa season 1, but her personality is more intensified by the lack of a good Peter Bishop to bring her out of her shell.
The differences of course don't stop there. The niches that each of the characters had before are all mixed up. Olivia trusts Nina, who in this world was a motherly influence on her. Astrid is a field agent and doesn't take Walter's antics as well as we know her to. Finally, we now have Lincoln Lee assuming the last remaining slot in the diminutive Fringe team.
The writers may have switched up a lot of things for this season, but they still take the opportunity to build on what they've established in the previous seasons. The two worlds are still in the process of mending each other's wounds, and now we get the occasional trans-dimensional case. This is a very satisfying twist to the freak-of-the-week formula, as we get to see each character bouncing off their counterparts and we're allowed to analyze cosmic "what ifs" and delve into all sorts of great dilemmas of metaphysics, definition of character, and the ramifications of cross-dimensional problem-solving.
The majority of the time spent in this season has been the classic mix of case-of-the-week that mirrors a current issue with one of the main characters. A couple have been just decent, with little nuggets of greatness tucked in here and there but no real "Wow" moments, while others have become some of the greatest standalone episodes in Fringe history. Episodes like "And Those We Left Behind" and "One Night in October" are just brimming with creativity and have moments that left me quite enthralled. I dare say that so far there have been no bad episodes, there have been some that were just good. The one that mainly disappoints is the season opener "Neither Here Nor There." It was entertaining, and paralleled nicely with the pilot, but it was so underwhelming outside of some great details that quietly made themselves known that it felt like the payoff of "The Day We Died" was nowhere in sight.
There's always a sense of understatement, or a subdued subtlety with Fringe. I love that atmosphere, and I enjoy the poignant moments that it allows to cross through the medium of television, wrought with big moments and twists that truly stand out due to how well it was directed and written--there's room for the actors to breathe their own life into the parts, and there's room for the audience to take some of the ambiguity of certain situations, the dire circumstances in others, and the heartbreak of many instances suddenly hit the viewer without overselling it, and making it campy or overblown. It's an unbelievably underrated way to be about storytelling these days.
However, sometimes this wears on me as a viewer if I happen to be in an off mood, like in the opener, it's an active process to catch every line of a character, to be sure to see the little things like the glances characters make at each other, and the subtle actions that they make that could mean much more than meets the eye. But, I occasionally think that at the end of the episode I have missed something, and assume it's on me to know what I missed, so I will rewatch...and yet I will find that it wasn't really adequately handled like thought it would be upon rewatching. So sometimes I find that I give the show too much credit for this. "Neither Here Nor There" is a good episode and all, but it fell a bit flat--Not because I was unable to catch all the meaningful parts that weren't obvious, but because something was missing (namely Peter, but also the whole episode was fraught with cynicism and grief, not the usual atmosphere of this show).
The best(worst?) way this little issue has been shown this season is in the episode "Alone in the World." While I personally loved the episode for its effects, the acting, the story, etc. it was just never explained fully where this brain/fungus/whatever it was came from, and there wasn't enough of an explanation for me to think "what a brilliant fringe science story"... They've been skipping a few things here and there like that through the season that would be very helpful to keep the integrity of the pseudo-science of Fringe up to date. However, that's one of only very few issues I have with the season so far. Just explain things a little bit more, guys!
While we were waiting on the impending return of Peter, the theme of loss of a vital aspect of one's life was becoming a little overdone. Still, the point remained that there was something vital missing in this universe, and when Peter came back we all expected rainbows and unicorns, right? Of course not, because this is FRINGE, and nothing on Fringe ever ends with rainbows and unicorns! Instead, we were greeted by time loops and tragedy. I love the time loops that have become a main terror for this season so far. Peter's dropped into Lake Reiden, and suddenly time is out of sorts all over the area. We've got places reverting to 4 years ago, and even Peter himself is popping in and out of time, at least his awareness is, as he seems to be fading in and out at different points in time by the episode "And Those We Left Behind"...
The best thing about this storyline however to me, is Peter himself. He's such a sport when it comes to being rejected by the entire world, and all the people he thought knew and loved him. He's being proactive in figuring out what went wrong, and why he's stuck in a place that doesn't want him. He's also become just as important to this version of the Fringe team as the one he is used to (aside from the fact that he seems to be the cause of a lot of things this season himself). He's slowly winning over the characters with his wit, his comprehensive knowledge of the last 3 years of the Fringe division, and problem-solving ability. At this point in time, Peter is under the impression that he is no longer in his world at all, and that he needs to be picked up and dropped back into the blue universe so that this world can go back to equilibrium, and he can get back to his world and his Olivia.
I'm not sold on that possibility yet, because I know the Fringe writers always have something up their sleeves when things start to make sense. However, if that is the case, I'd love for Peter to do what he does best, and somehow help Walter, Olivia, Astrid, etc. all become happier, better-functioning individuals, and maybe Peter will leave this world a better place than he found it. That's just a thought I have on that possibility. He's good at cutting through the crap, and getting to the point of what is wrong and what needs to be fixed.
Overall, it's been very good to me, with strong standalone episodes that are slowly weaving in other mysteries, like the new shapeshifters, and where Peter should rightfully reside. I think that this season will probably escalate as time goes on because it feels too linear at the moment. I feel a left turn coming on that we won't see, much like the end of season 1. I believe that the pace will be like a slow burn that will end in a bang, at the end of the season, and by that time we'll have a much bigger mystery to figure out with much bigger payoffs than the ones we're getting now.
Rating: B
What do you think of this season? Please leave your thoughts below!
Stay tuned for more mid-season reviews of returning shows!


Thanks Wilson
ReplyDeleteThanks! Nice review...
ReplyDeleteI'm similar with Fringe... or I used to be. I love to just enjoy the ride and consider things without really obsessing or discussing my theories. This site has changed that somewhat I guess, but as a rule I still prefer to not obsess over FRINGE like I did over LOST.
I have enjoyed this season quite a bit too. , but don;t rate it above a "B or B-" I guess. Oddly the very aspects I have enjoyed are the reasons I think it is "underperforming" this year. I love the new universe and the effect of Peter being gone on all the characters! I find it very enlightening to the previous three years. You can see what's missing now, and understand more about why people were what they were before when Peter was in their lives. Fascinating stuff!...
However, Peter not being around has made the show more COTW again which to me is NOT FRINGE's strong suit. Sure, they have some great stand alone episode over the years, but for me the mytharc and those serial episodes are the best of what FRINGE has to offer. That's what I loved about Season Three so much and also why I think this year has been less enjoyable for me than last year.
I expect now we can get back to the overarching myth story more and I will be as deeply invested with FRINGE as I was last season.... I hope!
Thanks for the review. I don't obsess over Fringe like I did 24 and LOST, but close. The mid-season finale left me feeling kinda mmmm kay. I was waiting the entire time for some epic scene or wtf moment and it ended with a (in my opinion) lame twist - and no Charlie :(
ReplyDeleteIt was obvious Peter was going to come back, I don't know, I just didn't dig that "where is Peter" storyline. I am also not crazy over the changes that were made due to Peter not existing. Nina raised Olivia? Where is Olivia's sister and niece? It's just going to far out in space and needs to come back and grasp its roots.
Well,that episode wasn't supposed to be the midseason finale...So there wasn't going to be a big twist...
ReplyDeleteWow,that was a great review of the season so far.Thanks Wilson!....I was a disappointed in the season opener also,and after the last episode from S3 i was not sure where they were taking it? Your right there have been some outstanding episodes,my favorite so far is And Those We Left Behind,i thought it was brilliant,that was my aha moment,and that's when i knew this season was not going to disappoint.I cannot wait for Fringe to return,but i will not get so hyped up,that it would creative a let down,but i have a feeling this next episode is going to blow us away! Lets hope it's a great ride,and buckle up! :)
ReplyDeleteGreat review Wilson
ReplyDeleteNice review - Thanks!!
ReplyDeleteThis season so far is a dissappointment, the show should be going for broke and being about Peter and 7 episodes in and there is no Peter really. Season 1 was Olivia, season 2 was Walter and Season 3 was again Olivia. This season is supposed to be Peter and he has not been in it really. They need to really start making progress or I am going to check out. I just wish they stopped saying this is Peters season and actually made it a Peter season. They have lost my trust and faith.
ReplyDeleteNice review
ReplyDeleteI'm filing you in the "The show has derailed" camp that I mentioned in my post.
ReplyDelete:)
I think that those first 7 eps were supposed to make you feel like that so that ep 8 would be the payoff, or at least the beginnings of a payoff on the Peter thing. But as we all know Baseball happened, or more like FOX happened (considering that it was them that sidelined the episode Novation for what would have been a week so that they could get in on the sweeps action, but then the world series and rain screwed that up so in hindsight FOX screwed the pooch on that one). But all that said, we would be having a different conversation (I believe) if the episode schedule had gone as planned. I really think that from here on out it will be the Peter show for the larger chuck of the season moving forward.
ReplyDeleteNice Review Wilson! I'm one of those crazy theorists that likes to stream my ideas as they come on this blog, but also I am less "crazy" (well comparatively) than I was with LOST. I find myself just enjoying FRINGE more than I did LOST as far as interaction goes too. I think the reason for that is because LOST held my adoration from the moment I found it, I got WAY to invested in the story and totally wrapped up in my own ideas of what I thought was happening (only to be let down as far as that goes). I am trying NOT to make the same mistakes with FRINGE. I'm just trying to let the story unfold as it wants to and only theorizing to see if I'm correct, not to try delude myself like I did with LOST.
ReplyDeleteI feel the same way....
ReplyDeleteThose first 7 episodes were the intro to the "real" season which started in episode 4.08. I think it was worst timing possible that the mid-season finale was delayed. Without it the season so far feels flat and the pay off has not been there.... yet.
I say that in acknowledgement although I have enjoyed the beginning of the season more than the first half of say... Season Two. FRINGE has a way of meandering a bit and then hitting its stride with a few brilliant episodes in a row that pull those past "meaningless" or "under performing" episodes together into a more cohesive whole.
MY guess is that episode 4.08 was going to be the beginning of that. The pay off that shed light on the past 7 episodes and made them all more meaningful and connected to the overarching story.
I do not blame Fox for the intended mid season episode not being aired and that being the reason some fans like myself feel cheated. The fact is that the show should not have to wait for 33% of its season to be finished before they address the Peter situation. This as I said before was supposed to be a season all about Peter and that has not happended. We instead get introduced to characters who we already spent 3 seasons focussing on...Olivia and Walter. We know their perspective, we have seen massive arcs on their perspective, this is supposed to be Peters perspective and in that respect they have failed and failed badly. The ratings are in the toilet and I just do not see them getting out of this at all, they are sticking to their guns to make this the Walter and Olivia show to the bitter end and that is going to cost them when 4.22 is announced as the series finale.
ReplyDeleteIt did not have to be this way, they did not have to go down this route, they could have restored some dignity, but they refused and best of luck to them. This should have been the mid season finale of 7 episode of nothing but Peter, it is not and only 2.8 million are watching and 1.1 in the key demo.
You obviously don't get it. Did you read my reply and comprehend it? The first 7 episode WERE about Peter. They were intended to focus on his lack of being there. All the Olivia and Walter stuff is to nail that fact down. You have to set up a reason to bring someone back from oblivion...you don't just bring them back and it's all puppies and roses. It is what is known as dramatic conflict.
ReplyDeleteYou would have Peter's decision in the season 3 finale do what? Nothing? There had to be some sort of sacrifice, and that sacrifice is/was Peter loosing his involvement with the Fringe division, him loosing the woman he made that sacrifice for by means of her never knowing him, loosing the father he so wanted to protect from the hatred of the world by having him no longer recognize him. You cannot have a plot about getting someone or something back without loosing that someone or something. WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BE FEELING EXACTLY WHAT YOU ARE FEELING (well without all the over-exaggerated Olivia and Walter hate [the issue I see right into with you] you are experiencing). FOX DID DROP THE BALL (so to speak) ON THE SCHEDULING OF FRINGE..
Like I said; Had FOX not screwed up their schedule, at this very moment you and I would be most probably speaking about how cool it was that they tied all those first 7 episodes together with episode #8. We'd be able to see the REASON(s) why Peter has been treated the way he has, we'd begin to see the pieces falling into place, you'd more than likely be saying something like: "Wow and to think i thought they were excluding Peter, but now I see why they did all that..."
So be pissed off, or enjoy the story as it's told, but please get a clue.
I'm sick these "fall finals". What a lame excuse to avoid more episodes. This season has only shown 7 episodes....SEVEN!! We waited 3 weeks for the last 2 episodes because of baseball and now we have to wait 2 months because of three holidays. Lame.
ReplyDeleteOH I have a clue, Just because the characters keep referencing Peter and how something is missing in their life does not make it about Peter. I want his opinion on what is happening, his point of view. How does he feel that no one in any universe knows who he is...he is all alone. Does he want to scream, cry, shout, laugh....die? What is his point of view? That is what I want from a Peter season...I want to know what he thinks and feels...I do not want Olivia and Walter going on and on and on about what they feel. What is the point again of hearing their point of view? NOTHING!
ReplyDeleteWe know how Walter feels about experimenting on children, causing a war, etc. His POV has been hammered home already. I know how Olivia feels because they have her give monlogues and conversations and freaking out on Peter because he did not recognise that the other Olivia was not her.
I do not hate Walter or Olivia...I have just seen their POV time and again, I know how they feel. I want to hear from Peters mouth what he wants to do. I do not want wise cracks and snarky comments and the overall sense that he does not have a pulse or any humanity within him. Peter deserves better, Josh deserves better, we deserve better.
As I said before we should be well into Peters journey and Fox did not drop the ball. This whole season should have been Peter opening up and saying what he feels and wants.
The show has failed to do that and failed to keep its audience, simple as that.
nice review i love this season
ReplyDeleteI digress.
ReplyDeleteI am not the only one frustrated with the lack of narrative momentum. Sepinwall, McGee, Ryan, McNutt, Fienberg, etc have all expressed frustrations about the lack of qualitiy in the season thus far. I have read reviews on IGN and other sites where the reviewers are losing patience and were underwhelmed by the last episode.
ReplyDeleteI do not say this to try and reinforce my point, just to point out that there is some validity to it. I will have fun when I start to see a Peter arc forming over 9-10 episodes of consistently nothing but Peter and his perspective like they did in season 1 and 3 for Olivia and season 2 for Walter.
I understand your perspective...Lets say that...OK.....I buy into your theory that the writers will decide to tell us what needs to be told when it needs to be told and that they are holding all the Peter stuff for the back end of the season where they can appropriatly deploy it.
ReplyDeleteMy question and part frustration is .....can they afford to wait to deliver these answers so late considering that their ratings are now almost worst then the vampire diaries and most cable shows? The last episode was 2.8 million viewers and a 1.1....can this show afford to string an already frustrated audience that is leaving in the thousands if not millions?
Fans put out a campaigne of where is Peter Bishop? at the end of season 3 and they asked at Comic Con alot of times when are we going to get all an answers to the Peter situation?
Fans are dying to know more about Peter and they are not getting it at all. It makes sense as you say to integrate Peter at the right moment but does the show have the luxury to shine fans on for months on end considering they are on the cliff and facing oblivion?
Also what if they do not give him a proper arc? what if his arc is not like Olivias and Walters where they had whole seasons? Can the writers and producers risk the potential damage to their shows reputation?
Chuck did the same thing in season 3 where they did not give fans what they wanted until the producers thought they were going to be cancelled and althought the show has given plenty of what fans want since then...the fans have never forgotten that the show runners were willing to mess with fans and the show went from being great to average/good. It is a risk that may not pay off to hold off Peter for so long and maybe not give enough of him.
Trying to create the perfect piece of art is vey noble and well intentioned and I respect them if they are doing that but they are pushing themselves into a corner where everything has to be perfect, they have to hit it out of the park or they will bring their whole show down in the process...they are already bringing it down with the low ratings and crappy episodes like wallflower....how far are they willing to go down?
If Fox loves this show so much how come Kevin Reilly said they renewed it to help it get over 80 episodes? The DVR numbers even if they get an 80% lift the key demo is still under 2.0...Grimm is getting 1.6 and that is without the DVR numbers which probably puts it over 2.0.
ReplyDeleteI will put money on the fact this show will not see a fifth season. the ratings could decline even further to below 1.0....there is a long break and they have to hope that fans stick around considering this season has so far driven nearly a third of its key demo away.
22 episodes is more then enough for any show...if they used those episodes to tell some of the comic book materials such as Peters adventures in the machine with the observer that would have been better than the bs wallflower episode and half the other crappy ones too.
It always makes me laugh when a fan says well we have more of the story fans want and the ratings are still bad! Well here is the thing Chuck in season 3 started at 3.0 and when they resolved the chuck and sarah crap they were down to 1.8....the fans said oh it did not matter putting them together the ratings are still bad! Well here is the thing why not give fans what they want when you are at 3.0! Why wait for your show to be on its knees (1.8)! lol. Why wait for Fringe to go from 1.5 to 1.1?
Lets agree to disagree. This shows time is almost up, you cannot make a show a winner to mass audiences when it will never be that.
Yep I agree that we disagree. Real fans don't leave over plot twists. Real fans of a story finish it. Fringe knows this, thus they stay true to their formula.
ReplyDeleteWhat good would it be to Fox if they syndicate a show they never let end properly?
Who would buy it? Who wants to air a bunch of jumbled up episodes of a serialized show with no ending?
The answer is NOBODY!
So you are trying to tell me that you believe a FOX exec will let that happen? That is like creating a sculpture, then leaving it headless and calling it "Look at My Face", and hoping people will want to display it in their galleries or museums. Yeah what's the point?
Dude seriously quit trying to analyze the show. Forget the ratings, it is not for you to figure out. Just watch the show. I PROMISE ALL THE PETER STUFF WILL COME TO FRUITION.
If Syndication is what FOX wants ultimately, (and really who doesn't want that?) then it's in their best interest to let the show have a proper ending.
So I don't see what your issue is? I mean I see that you are scared that an ending will not happen, but you are totally wrong to believe that. It may not be the way that Fringe wanted to go out, but they will make it happen. P&W have said that if it comes down to it, they have a plan to end it if need be.
So no matter WHEN that happens there will be an ending, which means there will be a complete show. So your fears are unwarranted. You may not like that ending, but it still doesn't change the fact that there will be one. I am one of the few that found issues with the ending of LOST, but it didn't change the fact that millions of other people actually liked it and bought it. I got over it.
I have said this before, Liken a show like Fringe or LOST to a really long novel. Read (watch) continuously until the ending, then reflect on the show as a whole. Don't close the book in the middle of a plot twist, just because you don't particularly like what is happening in said twist. Finish the book. You still may not appreciate the story after you finish it, but you may see that you really loved it too. After you finish it you can say what you want, but you honestly cannot judge a story until it is told. Nor can your comments here change anything, that the Fringe Producers are gonna do. Or the FOX execs for that matter too.
How can someone fail, before they finish something? The answer is: They can't. Pinkner's and Wyman's
responsibility is to tell a story. They are telling a story. The only fail is from you, as a fan. You fail to appreciate the story as it is told. (When was the last time you were able to control a writer with your commentary? I assume never.) So you are just ranting to yourself and a few others that may feel as you do. YOU are in the minority here, not me, I'm sorry you feel like Fringe is letting you down, but there ar people like me who don't feel that way, we make up the majority of the fans, wse are sticking around to see the end no matter what, we are the ones that send redvines to the execs. If you are so worried about the fate of Fringe then go out and buy some of the things from the advertising, or at the very least follow all the advertisers on Twitter and let them know you appreciate them sponsoring Fringe. I know that you probably don't have a Neilson box, so unfortunately you cannot help the ratings. But you can DVR it, and not FF through Commercials, You can believe in the show, Just "Imagine the Impossibilities".
THE END.
First of all Fox does not produce Fringe, Warner Brothers does. So all the profits from syndication and other related merchandising goes to them and them only. Fox does not care if Fringe finishes their story or not...it has no bearing to their bottom line. When a show runner says that the network is supportive and all that other stuff....they are being diplomatic.
ReplyDeleteI never said Wyman and Pinkner failed to tell a story, I said they failed to tell a story that kept fans tuned in week after week. Just because people leave a show or put down a book halfway does not make them a bad fan...it just means they found the book or the episodes not to their liking and decided to put the book down and not watch the show the following week.
I maybe in the minority here posting something negative but that does not mean I do not have a point or that you do not either.
I bought a two toyota cars for Chuck back in the day of the fan campaigne...I have put my money where my mouth is....I never minded the crap Chuck pulled because it is their show and I am not really a shipper and they owe me nothing.
My main points are that why do shows make it so difficult for themselves? Why is Fringe going all this way to lose fans in the thousands? Why not just play the game a little and give Warner Brothers more of an incentive other than financial to give them more episodes?
Warner Brothers Like Sony and any other production companies basically give their shows aways to reach syndication, the licencing fees are reduced to next to nothing so that networks will take them on. Chuck was given away for basically nothing for most of its life and sony will do anything to sell community so they will most likely get a fourth season. Fringe has reached the threshold of exactly 88 episodes.
I do not hate the show, the actors, the producers, the crew or anyone. I am really fond of what they put out....I just do not comprehend the way they have constructed a vital season for the series....giving such weak offerings early up when they knew that fans were at their limit with some of the things they were doing...specifically Peter.
Wowthisthreadistiny.
ReplyDelete