Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Ringer - Episode 1.04 - It's Gonna Kill Me, But I'll Do It - Review


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Ringer - Episode 1.04 - It's Gonna Kill Me, But I'll Do It - Review

Oct 5, 2011

Share on Reddit
"You mean to tell me — all those games, cheering, shouting — you were faking? What else were you faking?" —Andrew

Brace yourself, readers, for the most bold claim you may ever read this early into the new TV season. Stop what you're doing. Lower the volume on your TV, turn that ever-so-loud AC unit off, and give the following your undivided attention.

Ringer is my favorite new show of the season.

Don't adjust your computer screen, you read correctly. And I'm not ashamed of it. I've been questioning how I could actually be enjoying this show for so long, deciding whether it's guilty pleasure material or genuine entertainment, and I've decided it's somewhere in between… maybe it's both, but whatever it is, I have jumped on the bandwagon. I'm wearing Ringer Tees, I'm proclaiming my Ringer loyalty through bullhorns, you can catch me on the corner wearing a Ringer sandwichboard and ringing my bell.

I've sat through the following new shows: 2 Broke Girls, Hart of Dixie, Terra Nova, The Playboy Club, New Girl, H8r, Up All Night, Free Agents, Revenge[*], Charlie's Angels, The Secret Circle, and Whitney (I don't believe I missed anything but I might have), and none of them have caught my attention as much as Ringer has. None. 2 Broke Girls is funny, but tries to go for the jugular more than your gut at all times; Terra Nova actually thinks its dialogue is good; Charlie's Angels is way too serious with lines like "We're not cops, we're Angels"; Free Agents is just god-awful; New Girl is a hit but inexplicably so; and so on.

*Okay, to be fair, I actually like Revenge a whole lot (apparently, I'm into really outlandish soaps based around rich people who have Hampton homes this season). But I don't feel the same for that show as I do Ringer. Let's see how I feel after four episodes of Revenge. Oh, and also the first two minutes of Homeland were probably better than any minute of all pilots I have watched this fall, so there's that. And I must also note there are some shows that have yet to premiere, of course.

Yep, I'm a Ringer fan. But that doesn't mean I won't point out every single one of its flaws, because I'm about to. After all, isn't that what love is all about? Ringer is like my little sister. I love her and I just want her to succeed. And doing that takes brutal, strong criticism so that she can reflect upon her misguided mistakes.

Like those visual effects. Apparently the terrible ocean visual effects wasn't atrocious enough the first time around, so here they are attempting it again. But that was just a small scene.

Ringer's biggest flaw, arguably, was its choice in music. So by episode four, it decided that… no music was best? I didn't like the bubblegum indie rock, either, but I don't know how I feel about absolutely no music. Agent Eyelashes finds the surveillance video of Bridget getting her duffelbag: nothing. Eyelashes tells Gemma about Bridget: nada. Gemma finds out about her husband and Siobhan's affair: zip, zilch, nothing whatsoever! I had to make up for it with outlandishly loud gasps. "Bridget, her twin sister—" GAAAASSSSPPP!!!!!! I thought my lungs would collapse on that one alone. Imagine how faint I was with that cliffhanger ending!

But what's really catching up with me is the fact that no one seems to perhaps think just a little bit that Bridget isn't who she claims she is. I can understand that no one knew about Bridget, fine. But Gemma found out. Does it not go through her mind how different she's been acting? Or perhaps the fact that she ate meat for the first time in three years? And Eyelashes does know. When he enters her home and picks up her phone (which I believe is…somewhat illegal, maybe just a tad?) and sees she's called Malcolm or that she picked up Bridget's duffelbag, he didn't have the slightest clue that maybe it's Bridget? I hope he's not an indication of anyone that's actually doing work for the FBI.

And our characters aren't making the best of choices, either. I love you, Bridge, but what are you doing letting the FBI stay in your — ahem, Siobhan's — home after he tries to interrogate you again? Escort him out! And why would you reveal your biggest secret with the FBI agent just feet away and the door wide open? And why would you reveal it at all? Isn't the point of assuming Siobhan's identity to keep yourself alive? Who cares about a marriage going into shambles? (Wow, that makes me sound dead inside.) I think the most risky of careless acts, however, was Henry and Siobhan's flashback when they're doing the deed a floor below their significant others. Then, they finish and just stay in the buff. Perhaps you should put some clothes on in the slight possibility that one of your spouses happens to walk downstairs. I suppose it's just as well. Gemma can hear Henry and "Siobhan" talking but she can't hear them having sex. But still, to do what they did, you need what my people call cojones, meng!

But it wasn't all bad, of course. Finally we got some progression I was really hoping to see. Namely, Andrew and Bridget talking about sex. Yes, this is seriously one of the things I was most anxious about. It wasn't much, but at least they hinted to sex at some point (the quote in the beginning) even if it wasn't between them. The Ringer showrunners also decided to go full speed ahead with everything, which may be good or bad I don't know but at least it's entertaining. Also, Sarah Michelle Gellar is doing a fantastic job with her two characters. There's this subtle, and yet completely distinguishable, difference in the way she plays both characters — even her voice changes inflection for both Siobhan and Bridget. It's done exquisitely.

I won't lie to you, Ringer is not the smartest show ever, it's not the best, and it's definitely not the most meticulous, but it's certainly compelling. It's fun. Who says every hour on television has to be endlessly thought provoking? It doesn't screw its audience around, in terms of story. It's not going to The Killing you into watching an entire season, wasting all your time on red herrings and leads that go absolutely nowhere. It proved that tonight. And it did so while trying to throw its audience off its feet and shake things up.

I can certainly mention worse ways to kill an hour. But gladly, I'm having way too much fun watching Ringer to even think about them.

Read my other Ringer reviews:
Episode 1.01 Pilot
Episode 1.02 "She's Ruining Everything"
Episode 1.03 "If You Ever Want a French Lesson"

12 comments:

  1. I do agree with most of what you said.. Being a fan doesn't mean to always root for it and turn a blind eye toward its flaws.. I am too loving this after last night's episode..

    One thing you didn't mention is WHY was Siobhan looking through her husband's accounts?? and what plan she preparing for him?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the review!

    I loved this episode and as I said before the series keeps getting better and better.  So much happened in this episode and it was a total game changer. I liked the fact that they showed more of Siobhan, more flashbacks and that cliffhanger.... this episode almost felt like a midseason finale!
    That being said, I'm not that bothered by Bridget being so dumb... it's for entertainment issues, so much wouldn't happen with her doing the right choices and that means no show.
    I really like this show and I can't wait for the next episode.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nice review again.

    I always appreciate when a fan of a series is able to break down said series and point out its flaws since most (if not all) series have them.

    Good even the half second flashback footage of the boat scene was still bad visually. XD

    I think the show has gotten better, but I think I finally figured out what is putting me off every episode. Surprisingly, I think it might be Sarah Michelle Gellar. A few times per episode those little Buffy-isms and mannerisms come out and make me realize that so much of SMG is Buffy to me. It feels like the role or Bridget's and Siobhan's personalities (or SMG's acting performances) are not far enough away from Buffy for me to not compare a handful of times every week.  

    The continued dumb moves every week by Bridget doesn't exactly help much either. XD 

    I'm starting to really enjoy the supporting cast more and more every week. Good performances consistently and their roles seem more believable to me than either Siobhan or Bridget. I guess with quality performances by the actors I don't mind less music and score music. I am not a big fan of start to finish scoring in the first place honestly. I don;t mind the indie music either in the small doses of the last 2 weeks... much better to me than classic rock or something that just would not fit the characters or the series.

    There are a lot of plot flaws like you mentioned. The one that bothers me almost every week is the fingerprint thing. Agent Eyelashes never thought to compare prints left at Bridget scenes to the items or places "Siobhan" has touched since he started investigating her? Seriously? Identical twins are kinda notorious for switching places in literature and media.....  How can that not enter into his mind?  It just seems logical to compare prints to see which twin he is actually dealing with.

    I'm hoping that something clicks in me (or in SMG's performances) and I start seeing her as a completely different role so I can enjoy the series more..... *fingers crossed*

    ReplyDelete
  4. hahaha it does .. there are so many questions about Siobhan and they're increasing .. but yeah the wait thrilling!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't mean to say her performance is bad, I meant is not being able to not see her innate Sarah Michelle Gellerness really so bad that you can't see her differently? Regardless, you answered my question. I guess it's sort of a blessing never having been a true fan of Buffy.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don't think her performance is necessarily "bad". It's just that I think so much of SMG makes its way into her performances - it's part of what makes her so likable really.  It also makes so many of her roles feel so similar to me.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You're welcome :D

    It was definitely a game changer, and only 4 episodes in! Yes, I didn't even talk about Siobhan but I like that we know a little bit about her endgame, with this new guy at least. And I can't wait for every Tuesday, either :D

    ReplyDelete
  8. Exactly. I can be a fan and know what doesn't work in the show. After last night's ep, I'm all in.

    It's a good question. I didn't mention Siobhan really in my review, but I do think that her storyline is the best and most mysterious one that the writers are working on so I leave it be. But it does irk me that I don't know! XD

    ReplyDelete
  9. As someone said below, you just gotta let Bridget do stupid stuff or else there would be no show. Like I said, hopefully Agent Eyelashes isn't an indication of any real FBI agents, because…

    As for SMG's performance. I never truly watched Buffy, so if that's the case, then it's easy to understand why I'm loving her performance so much. Is it really that bad that you can't differentiate the two (or three) characters? :/

    ReplyDelete
  10. The storylines are getting better! Of course Bridget doesn't make the best decisions but really when in her life has she? Just because she has expensive clothes and a house in the Hamptons doesn't means she's not a recovering addict. I really liked the flashbacks to the sisters and how their relationship has changed, we still need to find out what unforgivable thing Bridget did but it has to do with Siobhan's son, that much we know. SMG did an amazing job with the two characters because I forget they are the same actress and was feeling really sad about the sisters not staying in touch. The necklace was really sweet. Also I think when Henry and Siobhan were at the Hamptons for her birthday the previous year, Gemma and Andrew weren't there because she said he left her at dinner to go deal with work.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I've just watched this episode as it was on last night in the UK. I'm still a bit unsure about the scenes between Bridget and Siobhan, or should I say SMG & SMG. I understand it's going to be difficult visually but it's weird. It's hard for me to explain.

    However, it does seems to be getting better. This episode wasn't too bad.

    I don't ever notice the music but it does creep me out when there is none at all. I keep expecting to jump!

    Anyway back to this episode, I can't believe she told Gemma that she's not really Siobhan. Granted I don't know how she would get out of having an affair with Gemma's husband.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.