Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Pretty Little Liars - Advertisers pulling out over lesbian character?


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Pretty Little Liars - Advertisers pulling out over lesbian character?

Aug 21, 2011

Share on Reddit
Thanks to Richard for the heads up.

When Pretty Little Liars' Emily Fields came out as a lesbian on the hit ABC Family show, it stirred up a heap of drama with the ultra-conservative Florida Family Association.

So what went down?

The FFA launched a campaign earlier this year asking advertisers to pull ads from the show because of Emily's romantic relationships with other women, which they called "irresponsible imagery."

The association even went so far as to describe the lesbian content on the show as "using salacious and glamorizing scenes portraying young, pretty women as lesbians", saying it "sends the wrong message to these young girls, a message that reinforces and legitimizes this homosexual lifestyle in a manner that could affect these young girls' sexual identity for a lifetime."

But did the FFA's campaign actually work?

While Remax Realty pulled its ads from the show following the launch of the campaign, the company in question is General Mills, which announced this week that it would follow suit.

The FFA published an email from GM's Director of Consumer Services Jeff Hagen, which read, "We have investigated this matter and confirmed that our advertising did air as you have reported. We have informed ABC Family Channel and our agencies that Pretty Little Liars is not a program that we will sponsor. Thank you for bringing this to our attention."

But when asked by AfterEllen.com if GM pulled the ads due to lesbian content, a rep for the company said that was not the reason.

"The decision is entirely based on the relevance of the show's audience for our brands, not because of the sexual orientation of individual characters." the rep told the website.

Meanwhile, the Florida Family Association is continuing their campaign. No word just yet on if more advertisers will remove their ads from the show because of it.

Source: E!Online

15 comments:

  1. This is absurd. I'm speechless. How can they get away with making such an argument about PLL? Glamourising??? How about educating!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm always surprised about this kind of things... it's completely nonsense! meh, maybe they someday realise they are idiots! 

    ReplyDelete
  3. how stupid is this, just get over yourself already
    not wanting to be associated with a show that has a lesbian character is sooo much more harmfull to your image then being associated with the show could ever be!

    ReplyDelete
  4. There are PLENTY of content related reasons a corporation should not endorse PLL. The Emily lesbian storyline is NOT one of them

    ReplyDelete
  5. It's sad things like this still happen.....

    ReplyDelete
  6. That's the truly offensive part of the FFA's goal. They don't want kids to be educated, they want them to remain bigoted and ignorant because being educated could "warp their values". Even said as much in their release.

    Scumbags.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I will never understand the reasoning behind this ... 
    ... I mean ... showing to a young audience that homosexual people are just as normal as any heterosexual person is a bad thing? Because it will automatically damage them by showing them that - in fact - being homosexual is the better way of living, directly influencing how their sexuality developes?
    I'm sorry.
    But that's a load of c*** ...
    ... the whole world - not just the FFA or even the US - still has to learn so much when it comes to that.

    And I just really hope that this is not a reason for advertisers to pull their ads.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I understand where there coming from. They're wanting this controversial topic to be with kids and there parents before seeing it on tv. However, I think this show is for the older group of kids who have already talked with their parents about that.The one that gets me is the Sesame Street thing. I mean all for equality but something about that just bothers me for a show like Sesame Street.

    ReplyDelete
  9. While I don't and will not ever agree with the principle behind their pulling advertising...  It's their company to do with as they please. If they want to hurt themselves by missing out on a part of the shopping public I am ok with it .

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'm cool with it. Emily was bi on the books, but the show portrays her a lot different. What about the bi girls confused over their sexuality?

    ReplyDelete
  11. If I were General Mills I would have pulled out for the teacher-student relationship.

    ReplyDelete
  12. What Sesame Street thing?

    ReplyDelete
  13. I think they mean about the recent petitions to get Bert and Ernie to marry on Sesame Street, to educate the kids about gay marriage or something?

    ReplyDelete
  14. why does it bother you? Does it 'get you' when heterosexual love or marriage is portrayed in children shows?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Bisexuality is a sexual orientation. It doesn't imply confusion over anything. & what even is your point with this. They didn't portray Emily as bi, so you are okay with homophobia?

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.