Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Game of Thrones - Episode 1.01 - Winter Is Coming - Full Review


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Game of Thrones - Episode 1.01 - Winter Is Coming - Full Review

21 Apr 2011

Share on Reddit


HBO's adaptation of Game of Thrones has finally arrived! Was it awesome? Yes! Would I recommend it to everyone I know? Hell Yes! Was it as incredible as I had dreamed it would be? Well... the jury's still out on that one. While I really liked what I saw of this sure to be epic television series, there were a couple of major elements that caused me to enjoy it less than I had hoped.

Although I am going to try very hard to review Game of Thrones without the books in mind, the faithfulness of this adaptation to the source material is going to make that an incredibly daunting task. I will steer clear of book spoilers in this review, but be warned that spoilers concerning the first episode, entitled Winter Is Coming, abound.

The series premiere of GoT ranks as one of the best I have ever seen; however, it failed to immerse me as completely as I would have liked.



The show immediately drew me in with the cold open. It served to show us a hint of the supernatural in a world where the supernatural has not been sighted for millennia. Stunning to see in HD and more than beautifully shot, my very first thought was that I was watching a movie. This feeling continued throughout the next scene, which effectively introduced all of the key members of the family Stark. It wasn't just that the image quality was excellent. There was a moment when the camera circled around Sansa and Arya as they practiced their needlepoint, exploring the differences between the characters almost wordlessly. The style of the shot was exactly what I would have expected in some sort of movie introduction. I have never seen a technique like that used on television. Game of Thrones would be well served to continue this kind of storytelling.

Although most scenes in the first portion of the episode are character introductions, they also include important bits of exposition while mostly remaining interesting for the viewer. As such, I could continue recapping the episode for about as long as the episode aired. Instead, I'm going to shift my attention to a general discussion.


Praise and Criticism:

One of my concerns going into this was that fans of the books would be delighted to see the pages come to life, while those who haven't yet read them would be more than slightly confused. One such potentially confused friend alleviated that fear as he was able to follow the intricate plot reasonably well. He also told me something very important. Like me, he loved the cliffhanger ending; however, that wasn't the sole reason for which he will continue to watch the show. He felt that "the characters really [came] across as people." It's wonderful and rare to see a cast of literally dozens with the power to make you feel strongly for each of their characters. It's even more rare to find a group of characters this flawed, complex, and real.


Unfortunately, my friend also felt that the episode was "mostly setup." For him, this wasn't a big problem as he appreciated any and all information being thrown his way. For me though, it meant having to slog through some heavy exposition. That isn't to say that the acting was off or that the dialogue was poorly written. Far from it. One problem is that some scenes are so faithful to the source that they actually paraphrase directly from the book. This occasionally made the anticipation of what was to come less about a story being brought to the screen and more closely related to it being read aloud by people in nice costumes. Another problem was that flashbacks would probably have been more effective than a couple of the aforementioned expositional conversations.

On the bright side, this episode seems to have set up what's to follow quite well. I am now invested in the characters and, although there will undoubtedly be more exposition to come, the cast seems up to the task of making it quite interesting. On that note, I'd like to discuss said cast.


Actors That Stood Out:

It quickly became apparent that the casting directors struck gold with 99.9% of their actors. Instead of heaping praise upon the likely candidates, namely Sean Bean and Peter Dinklage, I thought that I would point out three others that really caught my attention.


Mark Addy, who is probably best known for his comedic work, didn't seem like the right fit for the heavy role of King Robert Baratheon . As such, fan reaction to his casting was somewhat lukewarm. In Winter Is Coming, Addy not only rose to the challenge, but quickly became one of the most fascinating actors to watch. He gave Robert, a Heroic Warrior turned Drunken King, the exact right combination of adulterous fool, humorous clown, and regal monarch. His line deliveries occasionally gave me chills, especially during the scenes with Sean Bean in the crypt. I look forward to seeing more of his performance throughout the season.


I also took immediate note of Michelle Fairley, who plays Ned Stark's wife, Catelyn Stark (née Tully). In the first scene at Winterfell, when Ned proclaims his intent to bring their ten year old son, Bran, to witness a beheading, she expresses an extraordinary range of emotions with the single twitch of an eyebrow. She comes across as an interesting mix of down-to-earth and elegant. I very much look forward to seeing this wonderful actress bring her character to life.


Finally, Harry Lloyd, who plays Viserys Targaryen, the son of the mad king Robert dethroned, effectively held together what could have been a very awkward change of scenery. Moving from Winterfell to Pentos while keeping viewer interest was going to be no mean feat. Although I look forward to seeing more of Emilia Clarke as Daenerys Targaryen, who was given little to do in the first episode, it fell to Lloyd to keep us interested. His intense eyes betrayed hints of his character's potential insanity.

The above three were only a few of the actors that stood out within the scope of the pilot. Other incredible performances were given by the likes of Maisie Williams, who embodies the role of Arya Stark to perfection, Kit Harrington as the brooding bastard-born Jon Snow, Emilia Clarke as the submissive yet dignified Daenerys Targeryen, Nikolaj Coster-Waldau as the charmingly sinister Jaime Lannister, and Isaac Hempstead-Wright as the (formerly) carefree Bran Stark.


The Music:

Having heaped praise upon the cast, I now have to discuss my only huge disappointment with Game of Thrones. The music did not move me an inch. The Main Theme used during the opening sequence was nice enough, but Game of Thrones had the potential for so much more.

I have made it known here on SpoilerTV that my favourite kind of composition involves musical variations. This technique roughly entails the same musical ideas being repeated in slightly different ways. The melody and the harmony grow in complexity while counter-melodies creep into the mix. Different instruments pick up each of these lines, changing the feel of the piece. The harmonies serve a similar function, changing to allow the melody a brand new context.

For an example of this, listen here to the 2nd movement of Beethoven's 7th Symphony.

Game of Thrones has 18 series regulars, 8 featured cast members, and dozens of named roles besides. Such a huge cast calls for music of epic proportions. Each character could have had a theme written in his or her honour (something known as a "leitmotif"). That theme could then have been varied based on a character's location and emotional state. Disparate character themes could have been combined in novel ways as characters grew closer or farther apart.

LOST was able to do this brilliantly. The majority of LOST fans will probably tell you that the music was key to making the show such an emotional journey. I just can't help but feel that Game of Thrones has lost out on an amazing opportunity. Instead of giving us beautiful music, the show opted to give us practically none. What music was actually present was nothing more than long notes accentuating the mood. It wasn't really "music". Hopefully, later episodes (OR LATER SEASONS :D) will try to do something like this. Sadly, the perfect time to have set up leitmotifs would have been during this first heavily expositional and introductory episode.

Final Thoughts:

Music aside, I was impressed with how accessible the showrunners made Game of Thrones. As someone who has read the books, I would have preferred less exposition; however, I understand its importance and hope that it kept newcomers interested. I have also been following the hype for over a year now. I have seen numerous featurettes, read countless pre-air reviews, and watched the first fifteen minutes three or four times. All of that has likely clouded my judgement. As we get farther into the season, this will hopefully no longer be the case.

Finally, based on the completely subjective and arbitrary scale of Ridiculously Bad to BEST. SHOW. EVER., I'm going to have to give Episode 1 an Excellent (let's call that 8.5/10).

Let me know what you all thought!

Follow me on Twitter: @LostCadence
Check out my Blog: http://cadencegtv.blogspot.com/

- Cadence

47 comments:

  1. Awesome recap, thanks very much for sharing with us all her.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The best part about the first episode was the bloody beginning and the cliffhanger ending. The rest was a bit underwhelming. One problem I had was that the scenes with theTargaryen silblings were honestly a bit boring. I hope the next episode is better because I'm really interested in King Robert, the Stark family, Jon Snow and Jaime Linnister's further development. A good introduction episode. (No, I haven't read the books. ;D)

    ReplyDelete
  3. I was laughing with a friend this week. He said something similar to you about the Targaryens and that nothing really happened in the pilot other than the first and last scenes. I agree for the most part, but then I thought about it...

    We had 3 beheadings, 3 decimated bodies,incest, attempted murder, murder, conspiracy against the crown, rape (for all intensive purposes), animal adoption and one hell of an awkward dinner party. On paper that is a lot for one episode. MY main issue was that most of the scenes were so short you didn't get to "feel" the impact of them.

    I have read in reviews that the first 2 or 3 episodes have a lot of introduction feel to them and then it starts to take off in episode 4.... but I wonder if some people will not wait that long? I generally don't watch that long if I am underwhelmed... so I am interested to see how the season unfolds!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great recap!

    Did you trim it down some or is that the full 1200 + words you mentioned?

    I have to agree with the style of the filming. Very unique for TV.

    One of the things that bothers me most is that for those that have red the books... that first episode had quite a bit going on and all of it really meant something to the plot of the season. If you haven't read the books though, it seemed like Cinéma vérité ...watching a day in the life of the Stark household and the Lannister's. Without the knowledge from the books you cannot piece together how and why the events in the pilot mean something.... yet.

    I think they would have been better served having a two hour premiere and had all (well most) of the development done with at that point and ended with a certain unnamed event that will happen in episode 2 or 3. It would have set up the rest of the season and truly shown what the series will be about for this season and the rest of its seasons.

    That said, from the pilot alone I will expect Sean Bean (Ned Stark), Mark Addy (Kind Robert), Nicolaj Coster-Waldau (Jaime Lannister), Peter Dinklage (Tyrion 'The Imp' Lannister, Emilia Clarke (Daenarys Targaryen), Michelle Fairley (Catelyn Stark) and Lena Hadley (Cersei Lannister) all to bee strong contenders for Emmy nods. Not to mention nominations for best dramatic series, best ensemble cast etc. If TV award shows had best technical categories... It would be a sure win for Timothy Van Patten directing, and a few SFX categories, costume design etc.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I haven't read the books, but like The Walking Dead last year, both premieres were simply brilliant in my book.
    Character driven, going for impact rather than the jugular, giving everyone enough time to begin to define their characters.
    However they've done the easy part now. I find episodes 2-6 are the ones that are crucial. The Walking Dead was largely decent for the rest of it's season but didn't match the premiere, shows like LOST & Fringe got better, shows like Flashforward got worse.
    It's all about from no onwards.

    I have faith though that this will be just fine. It looks amazing on my laptop, let alone on my Sky HD box.

    ReplyDelete
  6. You should enjoy the rest I wager.... the books are truly character driven and from the looks of episode 1, the series will be too.

    Despite its "flaws" I still think it was one of the best pilot episodes of the season and an artistic achievement! The most expensive series on TV and you could tell just looking at the wardrobe and sets... worth every penny of it!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Indeed I did trim down the original review XD. I had included 4 actors (Nikolaj Coster-Waldau as Jaime) in the Actors Who Stood Out section as well as a short bit about Kit Harrington/Maisie Williams truly being the perfect fits for the roles of Jon/Arya. There were also a couple of paragraphs about the episode itself discussing the colour pallet changes from region to region as well as a bit more on plot. It just got too unwieldy, so there was cutting lol.

    When you say that there was "quite a bit going on and all of it really meant something to the plot of the season," while I agree, I feel that some of it was a bit too much, especially in regards to foreshadowing. Cersei's character in particular seems a lot more arch and unpleasant than she came across in the first novel through the eyes of Sansa.

    I agree completely about a two hour premiere. I guess the issue is that they only would have aired in nine sittings instead of ten. Also, the end of the first episode is definitely the single best cliffhanger they could have chosen to keep people hooked. It's just unfortunate that next week's episode will likely remain expositional in tone.

    Also, did you see the emmy submission sheet this morning :D? There's an unfortunate lack of younger actors being submitted, but the rest are all there! I find their choice of Cersei as "Lead Actress" and Catelyn and Daenarys as "Supporting Actresses" interesting. I guess we'll be seeing a fair bit more of Cersei in the first season than we did in the first book.

    http://www.goldderby.com/television/news/1419/hbo-confirms-category-placements-for-boardwalk-empire--game-of-thrones?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter? T

    ReplyDelete
  8. Lol, I agree completely about LOST, Fringe, and Flashforward. I still have yet to watch The Walking Dead. I keep starting it with my girlfriend far too late at night to handle zombies.

    I'm glad you've taken to GoT so much. I've seen a lot of positive input from people who haven't read the books, but most of it is more in the realm of "that was pretty good and OMFG THE CLIFFHANGER!"

    And yes, it looks INCREDIBLE! I saw the 15 minute preview on my computer (on HBO itself) and the quality was brilliant. I then watched the episode in HD and it looked twice as good!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I loved the parts you left out, but I already knew about the different tones and colors... and I agree on the young actors fitting PERFECTLY.

    I think the foreshadowing was heavy handed indeed. They cut so much out of t ebooks that to leave in only certain foreshadowing events makes them glare in the light for even a blind man to see.

    I did see the Emmy submissions. Every year there are some actors in the lead category that are supporting to me... and vice versa...

    ReplyDelete
  10. Forget the zombies... the people are scarier in The Walking Dead... as a species we are seriously messed up! Ha!

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'm hoping that the Targaryen stuff gets more interesting too. As Daenerys, Jorah Mormont, and Khal Drogo develop, it should pick up. Even in the books, Daenerys' chapters are polarizing. So many people (women in particular) say that she's their favourite character. Personally, I wasn't as heavily invested in the story in Essos until closer to the end of the novel. We'll see how that works out on television.

    I'm glad you like the Starks though. They're the heart and soul of the series. Robert and Jaime were also incredible on screen.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Oh, did you wind up watching in the end?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Exactly. I hadn't thought of the foreshadowing like that! It's so true about the cutting! I'm just worried that some of the central portions and mysteries of the show will be way too obvious to everyone watching.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I fear much of the masterful subtlety of GRRM's work in the books will be lost simply due to so few episodes per season. I think it's unavoidable sadly. At least for the first season. Once everything is established in Season One I think the subtlety can come into play more so the rest of the series.... I hope.

    ReplyDelete
  15. As someone who hasn't read a single word of the books, I can say I wasn't at all confused as to the plot, which is much simpler than some people seem to think (at least as far as the pilot is concerned):

    The King of the 7 Kingdom's 2nd in command was murdered so he treks way up north to offer his old war buddy the job, while plots against him are brewing from both the family of the King he vanquished and his own wife and brother in law.

    I think making the first episode a "set-up" episode was smart, not just for the sake of introduction but because with source material so vast and intricate it's much better to draw people in on the strength of the characters. With an epic-scale story like this, viewers are going to need to really care about the who if there's any hope of them sticking around to watch the what, why, and how.

    It turns out this show has a lot in common with The Borgias:

    Murder? Check.
    Plot to overthrow a leader? Check.
    Brazenly open infidelity?
    Marrying off children as political strategy? Check.
    Depraved wedding reception?
    Newlywed rape? Check.
    Sibling sexual attraction? Yep. That too.

    ReplyDelete
  16. IT really does have a lot in common with the Borgia family and maybe even was influenced by them and other corrupt families of the Middle Ages or Renaissance.

    If you want more background info, HBO has a great spoiler free interactive viewer's guide. It has maps, House guides, family trees and character synopses.

    http://viewers-guide.hbo.com/game-of-thrones/

    ReplyDelete
  17. Most of the cast was amazingly well chosen, but I did have one or two smaller issues. Otherwise it was the pages come to life for me.

    I was looking forward to and always pictured some one like Ian McNeice (the newsreader from HBO's Rome) as Illyrio. I know he was cast in the pilot as Illyrio, and I was expecting him.... an unpleasant surprise. Roger Allam was serviceable, but lacked that stature, both physically and vocally, that Ian has.

    I think Lena Headey came off just a little cold to me as Cersei. I always pictured her as more calculating and analytical, but quick to temper and passionate. That can all change in the next episode for all I know. Maybe it was just how I pictured her in the books and not other people's perception of her character.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Agreed completely again lol. That's funny, Roger Allam was the only actor I didn't really like. He delivered every single line as if it were a witty one liner (even when it wasn't). He also added to my foreshadowing fears *spoiler alert* with his speech about pretty rocks.

    And I too imagined Cersei as far less cold than Lena Headey makes her. For me, this is because Sansa paints her like a godess. Also, bear in mind that *spoiler alert* not having read book 4, I don't have as much insight into her psyche.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I agree that's a lot of plot on paper, the problem was, especially the Targryens scenes DRAGGED. And the dinner party didn't look akward to me. ;D The king seemed to have a bloody good time. Lol

    ReplyDelete
  20. I can imagine that Daenerys could become a very interesting character in the future but after the 1st episode I don't really care about them. The Starks are awesome. They got this old Norse feeling which I love. And they have wolves as pets. :D

    ReplyDelete
  21. I think part of it with Sansa worshiping Cersei at first has as much to do with Sansa as Cersei. Sansa hates the north and it's lack of Chivalry, pomp and circumstance. Sansa wants to be the little princess she thinks she is and damned well 'deserves all the beautiful dresses, jewelry and festive balls that let her be admired and catered to. Cersei embodies all that is "high culture", the painted lady with all her well frocked servants that speaks of "getting the royal treatment"... not just the "empty title" he lord father holds within his cold and boring stone walls.

    I agree though that Sansa would logically worship a seemingly more fun-loving Queen than one so dour.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I felt the same way reading the books. Wolves as pets...no... DIRE wolves as pets? AWESOME!

    Dany and frankly that entire continent are my least favorite part of the books in the beginning. Dany does get better and evolves from submissive young girl sold into slavery (as a wife) to a strong and powerful woman that controls her own destiny.

    ReplyDelete
  23. In the books my two favorite characters by far are Arya Stark and Tyrion Lannister... I sense a theme. Maybe I like trouble makers that have a certain inner strength?

    ReplyDelete
  24. HA! Too true! Well from his perspective it was fun Sansa, Jon Snow and Catelyn were a little less comfortable. Jaime and Cersei sure had fun though.. ahem....

    ReplyDelete
  25. Cool. Thanks for the link.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I agree completely regarding the music......rather than having something reminiscent of Bear McCreary's score for Battlestar Galactica (which features quite a few leitmotifs), we get a standard score which features a good opening theme and a set of tones....
    FOr the rest, i simply loved it all.....Just a fantastic adaptation of my favorite book series!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Though i did notice that Bran had some sort of semblance of a leitmotif.......every time he climbed, the same music appeared...or a semblance of it, at the very least

    ReplyDelete
  28. Yea, Bran seemed to have music when he was on. The others did just get more harmonic tones than music.

    I just wrote and then erased a too long rant on score music .... feeling it was a bit self-indulgent and unneeded. Ha! I do have some censor or self restraint after all....

    ReplyDelete
  29. hahhaa, PBS has dire need of you, my friend...
    In any case, i do hope that Ramin Djawadi had the sense to create leitmotifs and a compose a score that is worthy of the series and the books.....
    I still stand by my wish to have Bear McCreary replace Ramin in season 2....he is fantastic!
    Sadly, he'll be too busy with BSG: Blood and Chrome (of course he's doing that!)

    ReplyDelete
  30. Ha! Me too! Well, Tyrion is my absolute favourite. *SPOILER ALERT* Bran was my first favourite, but his chapters got a bit tedious in Book 3. I don't even know if he's in Book 4.

    Arya has been a favourite too, but I find that some of her chapters are the most driven by the plot (as opposed to the other way around). I think I mentioned at one point that my only/biggest criticism of the novels is that, occasionally, some of the characters and their wandering turns into them being there for the sake of narration. For example, I felt that she was being used for that purpose when she met up with Berric Dondarion.

    Otherwise, strangely enough, Sansa is one of my favourites. I always grow fond of characters that initially appear one-dimensional because they usually evolve the most.

    ReplyDelete
  31. That's the thing. I think I mentioned the fact that they were going to include the infamous Renly "praying" scene at some point. I have no problem with depictions of gay sex at all. I just think that including it would ruin the subtlety of the relationship. I didn't pick up on it at all until my second time through the novels. AMC gets away with being that smart, shouldn't HBO too?

    ReplyDelete
  32. I guess where some of the worry about confusion comes from isn't so much the action happening now. It's more the history of the world that gives rise to character motivations leading to many many plot points. Also, at the moment, there are three major stories to follow. The Starks, The Lannisters, and the Targaryens. Even then, the Lannisters and Starks are all in the same place (not to mention Robert Baratheon). As everyone moves out, the story splinters and fractions into many more pieces .

    That being said, I'm relieved that they presented it in such a way that it all makes sense. For people like you who are obviously astute watchers of television, the occasional off hand remark from a character about some past event or their relationship to someone else has meaning. Others are often A) too busy talking with friends to notice or B) unaware of what the line could have meant.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Exactly! Bear McCreary would have been perfect. Or Michael Giacchino. Or someone who writes variations. Or lush orchestral scores. As for Bran's music... I felt that it was more of a "climbing adventure" theme. We'll see what happens with it though :).

    ReplyDelete
  34. Lol! Feel free to rant about music XD. It's my other passion besides television and I am more than inclined to discuss it in great detail.

    ReplyDelete
  35. OR Jeff Beal... and he already has the HBO connection having done theme work and scoring for Carnivale and Rome.

    ReplyDelete
  36. I did not pick up on it either... and it in NO WAY affects the story if it is omitted. At least not in my mind, but maybe GRRM or D&D felt otherwise?

    ReplyDelete
  37. Sansa and Dany grew on me after two or three books. The first annoyed me with her teen girl self-centered angst and the latter just bored me. Over the course of the books though they both become fully rounded out, dynamic characters that didn't cause me to sigh when I saw their names on the chapter headers.

    ReplyDelete
  38. You asked for it...


    I didn't even notice the absence of music until you mentioned it after the pilot, but I tend to not like overly loud score music. Like Lord of the Rings for instance. I can associate most of the important scenes in LotR with the score music playing almost in the foreground and to me that is a very bad thing. As soon as the music becomes as memorable as the scenes themselves...something is out of balance. I think I'm in the minority thinking that though. If the more usual epic scoring got more people into GoT I would deal happily with it, but...

    I don't have a score or soundtrack to my life... why do others need one in movies or TV shows? I often look at soundtracks or scores as a shortcuts that directors use to get viewers to feel what they want them to if the scene does not live up to its potential without it... compared to actually having brilliant writing,directing and acting express everything the scene needs. I absolutely hate when one is able to close their eyes and know a scene is building to something bad by the music alone being too obvious.

    In a perfect world, the music is subtle and enhances the scene without the viewer realizing it's even there. It is secondary to the performances and action, and does not overpower either. The more dramatic a scene, the less music it needs to me.... IF the performances, writing and execution are all on point. Actions scenes for instance need very little scoring when there is the real life sounds of carnage, slaughter in battle and clanging metal. It is a score all on its own IF they take the time to actually mix the audio (and audo effects) in a way that you feel the chaos happening on the screen.

    Complete absence like in Supernatural always bothers me too. Many SPN episodes I have watched and felt the audio mix was terrible...add a little background noise.. some score... something... I never felt that watching GoT. Most of the music free scenes had so much going on the background there was never "silence". The exception being the Stark Tombs and Stark bedroom scenes if memory serves....Both of those were better served with no music in my mind. It heightened the drama, let the viewer key on on the dialog and showed a sense of respect in the tombs.

    I feel often times that the more scoring is amped up like in LotR, the the more "epic fantasy" the scenes become. For me the lack of obvious score music gave GoT a more realistic feel... grounded and gritty. I think scoring fits in best in those "transitional" scenes where there is no direct dialog or action on the screen or some silent action like Bran climbing the old wall. In the pilot episode there was very little movement or transition by the characters themselves between locations. The one that comes to mind in the pilot is King Robert and entourage arriving at Winterfell. It had music and worked well to me.

    Lastly, and surprisingly briefly... I loved BSG and the score Bear McCreary created for it. I felt that the music itself was a character... and an important one. Game of Thrones has enough characters as is it for me.

    Ironically, maybe 25% of my heavy rotation listening is original scores.. mostly Jeff Beal (Rome, Carnivale and the Jesse Stone movies) and Atticus Ross (Touching Evil and Book of Eli)

    Pardon my ranting... it got a "bit" longer than I planned.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Nor all HBO home pages are created equal... or in flash format . Ha!

    ReplyDelete
  40. I was reading theories about casting Brienne for next season (a horse faced female knight stronger than most men and better with a sword than most too).... Think Ron Perlman could play 30 years younger and female?

    ReplyDelete
  41. Sorry it took so long for me to respond! Family was in from out of town and I didn't get to the computer much. Also, your lengthy post required an equally lengthy and well-thought through response :P.

    Alright, so, I disagree (to a certain extent) with some of what you're saying. I don't think music needs to be secondary to the action on screen. I think that all aspects of art found in television (drama in the form of acting (actors), literature in the form of dialogue (writers), visual art in the form of cinematography (directors/VFX people), and music (composers)) are equally important. When combined correctly, they create something greater than the sum of their parts. I described a similar point in the first article I ever wrote for SpoilerTV:

    http://cadencegtv.blogspot.com/2011/02/television-greatest-art-form-ever.html

    That being said, I definitely think that music can detract from the final product. If the music is awful (i.e. those original scores composed for Supernatural), the other parts suffer. At the same time, when music is used to compensate for those other parts, as you said, it feels cheap. The music is only there to twist your emotions in a certain direction because nothing else can. That's just as big a problem for me as having too little music.

    When everything is actually balanced properly, the final product is usually brilliant. I don't think each and every scene requires the exact same balance. There are plenty of wordless scenes that rely most heavily on acting or action sequences that are all about the VFX/cinematography. There are also scenes, or moments, where there definitely shouldn't be any music. For me, when well-written music is both present and appropriate, it isn't just a background ornament. It enhances what's on screen. The fact that you can remember the music from particular scenes in LoTR is something I like about that music. The scene isn't only about the acting and filming. It's also about the music.

    I also agree with you that it's infuriating when the music gives away what's about to happen or is trying to tell me FEEL THIS WAY! This is why I think that the music should never be a reflection of what the composer (or writer or directer) thinks a viewer is supposed to experience, but rather, a reflection of what the character on screen is experiencing.

    For example, if a character had to deal with some sort of terrible burden, but said character was also thinking about a beloved friend who had died several episodes/seasons earlier because of his or her actions, the dead friend's theme could weave it's way into the music. This would absolutely manipulate our emotions, but not as some sort of compensation for other parts that are lacking. It would be to enhance the experience beyond what the scene alone could provide.

    Phew, I didn't actually address everything you said, but I think I'm going to have to stop there :P.

    ReplyDelete
  42. LOL! I wonder what they're going to do with her. Everyone has been made far more attractive than I ever would have imagined. It would be unfortunate if the casting call asked for a "stocky/unattractive woman".

    ReplyDelete
  43. She could be more plain than ugly and I would be ok as long as they gave her bad teeth and made her taller than most men and stronger in build. She needs to be 5'10" minimum in my eyes, but I'd prefer over 6 feet. If the first impression of everyone in the books upon seeing Brienne is "big and ugly" the actor should be big and ugly too! Or at least unglied up since that can be faked more easily than stature.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Despite taking different approaches, I think I agree with most of what you say... other than how I define "score" (music)..

    "Film score" and "Background music" are synonymous to me and if the music moves into the foreground it becomes something else. It can still work if it's well done and designed to be that way from the beginning by all parties involved in the film's creative process.

    I misspoke when I said it should always be "secondary" I guess. It can be background music and still be primary in many scenes. I don't even have a problem with music so in the foreground that it is more important than what's being said, seems like a character itself or actually is a character. I think that is stylized and a purposeful choice that adds to many movies.

    I just don't think that Game of Thrones needs any of that though, and in fact, I think using Leitmotif may actually work against the feel of the books. There are sooooo many important characters in GoT, would you really want to hear that many differing "themes"? Maybe if they limited the changes to a theme for each House.. or each Kingdom, but not each individual. To me the entire series is about more an overall story told via individual points of view and giving singular characters individualized music seems counterintuitive to me.

    I have watched Winter is coming 4 or 5times now and except the time I purposely listened for the music more than watching the episode, I never missed music honestly. In fact, I found myself thinking to myself "there's music.... oh there's some more... well those are tonal in nature but definitely film score" that time too.

    All that said, I just have different expectations of film score than you I guess. I hope GoT blends in more score... and more musical score, not just harmonic tonal score, so that you don't continue to think it is conspicuous by its absence.

    And now for something completely different...
    Have you read any of the articles by reviewers commenting about GoT racism? I mean I know I am guilty of liking to hear myself speak, but seriously?!?! Those reviewers were so off mark it was comical, frustrating and maddening, but comical!

    ReplyDelete
  45. Fair enough. I can see how too many themes would be a little unnerving. That being said, in light of last night's episode, I may have to eat some of what I said. I still think character leitmotifs would have been best, but I think that there may actually be location leitmotifs. When we first saw Winterfell in the pilot, "Winterfell" appeared on screen with some strange theme that played once. At the time, I found it out of place (it was four notes with no music at all on either side of it randomly playing), but it seems to have set up the Winterfellian theme. I need to rewatch the second episode to see where it actually plays (does it only play IN Winterfell or is it following characters FROM Winterfell).

    Anyway, all of that aside, indeed I have read the discussions about racism. Well, some of them. The majority seem to only point out that the Dothraki are kind of just random brown savages with tribal drums, but has there been a very in depth and intense discussion of this? It's hardly a point worthy of controversy lol.

    ReplyDelete
  46. I will have to pay attention to the location leitmotif concept... I knew there was some semblance of music at te beginning of each location, but it was short and almost silent in episode one. Was this episode better for you score music wise? I thought I noticed more, louder and more musical scoring.... but we look/listen for different things....

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.