Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Ask Ausiello - 4th Jan - Loads of Show Snippets (Supernatural, Fringe, Glee, House, Bones etc.)


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Ask Ausiello - 4th Jan - Loads of Show Snippets (Supernatural, Fringe, Glee, House, Bones etc.)

5 Jan 2011

Share on Reddit

Thanks to Esteban for the following:

Question: The only spoiler I’m interested in right now is: When will your website be up!?! —Hatts
Ausiello: The wait is over. All together now, “Bus driver, MOVE. THAT. BUS.” TVLine.com is live!
Question: What’s in the Hatch? —Susan
Ausiello: Really? It’s the first Ask Ausiello back after my two-month hibernation, er, career transition, and instead of asking a legitimate question you decide to test out some new standup material?! What an Aushole.
Question: How about some Chuck scoop to celebrate your first Ask Ausiello at TVLine.com? —Hillary
Ausiello: Works for me. Mark your calendars for Jan. 17. That’s the date Jeffster makes its triumphant return. But that’s old news. Here’s some new news: They’ll be performing a cover of Whitesnake’s “Is This Love.” In other Chuck news, Lou Diamond Phillips has been cast as the V.O.W. (Villain of The Week) in 4.15, “Chuck vs. The Cat Squad.”
Question: There’s speculation that Callie is pregnant on Grey’s Anatomy. What say you? —Jar Ring
Ausiello: I say no comment.
Question: Can we please have a Grey’s Anatomy spoiler about Mer/Der? What’s going on with McBaby? —Debra
Ausiello: The prospect of a McBaby is a major topic of conversation in the Jan. 13 episode. (Hint: They want one. They really, really want one.)
Question: Do you wanna talk about the proposal coming up on Bones later this season? I’m a little bit (read: extremely) nervous about it. —Amanda
Ausiello: I do want to talk about the proposal, mostly just to set the record straight. There is not — I repeat not — one proposal coming up on Bones later this season. There are two, both of which my source says will “shake things up substantially.” The identity of one of the couples is pretty obvious. But the other? Not so much. Speculate away in the comments section!
Question: Heart-crushed that Booth shot down Brennan in the December 9 episode of Bones. I need something to make my heart full again. I need some positive Booth/Brennan scoop! Go! —Shay
Ausiello: They’re going to be spending Valentine’s Day together. Alone.
Question: Any new news on the new season of Torchwood? —Jackie
Ausiello: Captain Jack & Co. will be setting up shop in Los Angeles for part of the season, but the question you should be asking yourself is where in La-La Land will their operations be based? Will they be at…
A) The Beverly Hills Hotel
B) The Courtyard Marriot in Century City
C) Some random Motel 6 in the Valley
D) Bruce Willis’ Malibu compound.
The answer has been Waldo’d somewhere below.
Question: Congrats on the new site! As a late Christmas gift, I’m going to need all the info you have on the Glee Super Bowl episode, ASAP. —Stacy
Ausiello: Would you believe me if I told you that the original draft of the post-’Supe script did not include Kurt or his crush Blaine? Well, believe it. Luckily, Ryan Murphy shoehorned the pair into the high-profile episode at the 11th hour — much to the relief of one Chris Colfer. “It definitely made me a little nervous that they were having a huge episode without my character, to be sure,” Colfer confesses. “But they did squeeze us in. We’re in it for, like, a minute, but it’s a very happy minute.” The Golden Globe nominee goes on to admit that life on the Glee set has been a little “odd” since his character left McKinley High for the far more inclusive Dalton Academy. “It feels like I’m on a different show,” he says. “It’s kind of lonely to be honest, because I don’t have Amber [Riley] there with me. It’s weird. I feel like I’m a guest star.”
Question: I can’t tell how glad I am that you are back. I am going through Glee withdrawal. Do you have any scoop for us? —Bethany
Ausiello: POTENTIAL NEW COUPLE ALERT: Rumor has it the show’s Valentine’s episode will feature a flashback to Puck (Mark Saling) and Lauren’s (Ashley Fink) infamous seven minutes in heaven. And as he previously raved, it most definitely rocked his world.
Question: Glee seems to have paired up everyone except Mercedes. Is she ever going to get a boyfriend? —M.K.M
Ausiello: Not in the near future. In fact, there’s a scene in Valentine’s episode where Mercedes gives Rachel a big speech about the advantages of being single. Apparently, while all of her peers were knee-deep in romance drama, Mercedes was focusing on herself. (Funny story: That’s what I told my friends in high school too. OK, sad story.)
Question: Will Finn and Rachel get back together in Glee‘s V-Day episode? —Amanda
Ausiello: Um, no. Finn actually has his eye on someone else. I’ve said too much!
Question: What’s coming up necks on Vampire Diaries? —Krista
Ausiello: Necks. Funny. The long-awaited Bonnie-Jeremy smooch will finally be sealed in February/March. Right around the same time, Elena decides that the only way to save her family and friends is to sacrifice herself to Klaus (role still being cast).
Question: Can you tell us something about how Tyler and Caroline’s relationship is going to develop on The Vampire Diaries? —Nuria
Ausiello: It’s going to develop into a (wait for it… ) triangle. And the third wheel’s name?! (Drumroll… ) Matt!
THIS JUST IN: The answer to the Torchwood multiple-choice quiz is D) Bruce Willis’ Malibu compound. Congratulations to all the winners! Thanks for playing!
Question: A while back you hinted that there would be two breakups this season on House. Were Wilson/Sam one of them? And, if so, can you ID Couple No. 2? —Jacob
Ausiello: Yes, Wilson/Sam were one of the two. I’m not going to spoil the other relationship that’s about to crater, but I will say this: I actually teased that there would be at least two breakups this season. The key words being at and least.
Question: When does Olivia Wilde return to House? —Joel
Ausiello: I believe her first episode back is 7.18.
Question: Smallville producers have hinted that Chloe’s return will be awesome/badass. Care to elaborate? —Mercy
Ausiello: Here’s your one and only hint: The Matrix. In related news, look for a big Chlollie moment at the end of her comeback episode on Jan. 28.
Question: You’re back! Huzzah! I need some Fringe scoop please. I’ll take anything. —Hayley
Ausiello: My “Over There” mole tells me that an upcoming episode will flash back to 1985 to show the consequences of Walter’s kidnapping of Peter from the alt-universe.
Question: Castle? Please, please, please? My birthday is this week, and I’m a totally loyal fan since TV Guide (just ask Matt), so please give me some really juicy Castle scoop? —Gina
Ausiello: Spoke to Matt. He says he wouldn’t know you if he tripped over you at Subway. But that’s neither here nor there. A Castle scoop you want, a Castle scoop you get: A Castle-Beckett smooch won’t be the only plot twist in the show’s Jan. 24 episode. The ep will also feature some significant movement in Beckett’s quest to find her mother’s killer. Oh, and regarding the Big Kiss, let’s just say there’s a lot more to the story.
Question: Any new stuff on Supernatural? —Christy
Ausiello: As you may or may not have heard, a late winter episode will obliterate the fourth wall by transporting Sam and Dean to an alt-uni where they are actors named Jensen Ackles and Jared Padalecki starring in a cult TV show called Supernatural. Wait, it gets wink-winkier: In this other dimension, Sam/Jared has a wife — and it’s none other than Padalecki’s real-life bride (and former ‘Supe costar) Genevieve Cortese!
Question: Any decision on the new lead for Spartacus: Blood and Sand? —Charles
Ausiello: Not yet. Aussie actor Liam McIntyre was firmly in the running as of a few weeks ago, but ultimately producers decided that he wasn’t their guy. So it’s back to the drawing board.
Question: So excited about the launch of your new site! I, too, am obsessed with The Good Wife. Any scoop for us? —Andrew
Ausiello: This season’s breakout prop — Kalinda’s bat — will make a triumphant return later this season, only this time she’ll be assaulting a (literally) softer target: Blake himself! Coincidentally, the attack comes at a time when Scott Porter‘s future on the show is very much in doubt. “We’ve been discussing [bringing Scott on full-time] from the beginning and the decision has to be made quickly,” exec producer Robert King told TVLine’s Matt Mitovich. “There are so many other things Scott is doing, I don’t know if that is likely. But we have a very good Plan B if it’s unlikely.”
Question: I cannot wait for Parks and Recreation to return! Any scoop on my favorite parks department? —Carter
Ausiello: Andy is going to go to great (read: grotesque) lengths to prevent April from moving far away from Pawnee; a dark secret about Ben’s political past comes to light; and we finally learn where Tom buys his hipster threads (hint B***** B******* B***.)
Question: What’s ahead for Serena and her former professor on Gossip Girl? Their last scene was pretty great. —Ana
Ausiello: First they have to get past the little matter of you, know, her mother basically destroying his life. “The biggest obstacle for them will be can Ben ever actually get over what Serena’s family put him through,” explains EP Stephanie Savage. “It’s fine to blame Lily, but at a certain point it becomes part of a larger conversation about who these people are and how they conduct themselves. And just the reality of Ben trying to get on his feet and figure out what he’s going to do with his life is pretty challenging now, and how does Serena fit into that equation — if she does at all?”
Question: I need Ask Ausiello back in my life! I also need some Greek spoilers in my life. What amazing things can we expect to see from my favorite Cyprus Rhodes co-eds? —Jon H
Ausiello: Some fresh blood! In this season’s second episode, we’ll meet Heath’s oft-referred-to-but-never-seen younger sister (played by newcomer Caitlin Thompson). “We’ve referenced her in the past as the underage girl who Beaver hit on,” explains series creator Sean Smith. “Her name’s Heather, but it’s pronounced HEE-ther. She’s ditzy like Heath and becomes a ZBZ pledge as well as President Logan’s lackey pledge.”
Question: First of all, congrats to you and Matt and everyone else involved in this TVLine adventure. Now on to the question. It’s simple: Got any Danny/Lindsay CSI: NY scoops? —Jessi
Ausiello: I’ve got nothing on the DL sitch but I do have this: Hawkes is getting a special ladyfriend! Spartacus beauty Lesley-Ann Brandt has been cast as a potentially recurring love interest for Hill Harper’s lovelorn detective.
Question: Will Crosby and Jasmine get married on Parenthood? —Jane
Ausiello: A month ago I would’ve said yes. But now that I know what’s going to happen between Crosby and Gaby, I’m not so certain.
Question: How many more episodes will Jennifer Morrison be on How I Met Your Mother? —Iveta
Ausiello: You’ll see quite a bit more of Zoey, beginning with the Jan. 24 episode. “Her relationship with Ted continues to get more and more complicated,” teases EP Carter Bays. “There are a lot of twists coming.”
Question: I need a True Blood scoop. Maybe something on Jessica and Hoyt? —Endrick
Ausiello: Rumor has it Season 4 will not be kind to my favorite Blood duo. Actually it’s more fact than rumor since Alan Ball just confirmed for me via email, “The honeymoon’s over.”
Question: Friday Night Lights? I can’t believe the end is near. —Jeff
Ausiello: End? Who says it’s ending? (Mmmm…. Denial.) Before the last touchdown is scored, one character will enlist, another will get engaged, and *** *e*** **** *e**** ***.

Adam
Source: Ask Ausiello

54 comments:

  1. At this point I think we can all agree that Sera Gamble and the rest SPN writers are completely INSANE(in a very good way)......

    ReplyDelete
  2. omg :D booth and brennan, spending valentine together?:D

    ReplyDelete
  3. agreed. it does sound fun to watch however

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Fringe spoiler sounds interesting, but it's confusing me! When I saw the spoiler about casting young Peter and Olivia (both age 9) I was thinking we might see Olivia shoot her step dad as I think she was 9 when she did that. Now I'm not so sure and am confused. This says we are in 1985 so Peter is 7, is Olivia the same age? I think she is but I'm not completely sure about that. Then again they may use children who look 9 for 7 year olds.

    Also is this in the other universe or ours, I can't tell, does Ausiello saying "Over there mole" mean it's there or is that just his way of saying his Fringe mole in a silly way? I'm tired and probably not thinking properly, maybe it's obviously over there to everyone else. If it is over there that would be really interesting and something I'd not thought about before. Did alternate Olivia shoot her step dad too? Or is she "damaged, dark, quiet and yet tough and a survivor" for some other reason? Also why would Olivia be damaged in 1985? In our universe I doubt she was that damaged in 1985 it would be after she's shot her step dad even though I guess he could already have been abusing her mum and that would be damaging. Also if it's over there I wouldn't be surprised if for some reason Peter had met alternate Olivia when they were children.

    I should go to sleep before I write anything else stupid (hope it makes sense) but I am looking forward to this episode it sounds like it will be really interesting. Maybe it'll even be the consequences in both universes but I feel we've already seen how it was when Walter got Peter to our universe, so maybe it is completely over there.

    ReplyDelete
  5. ummmm Supernatural ? lmao Sounds insane atm i also agree but i'm sure i'll have a huge crush on it and watch it over and over though LOL

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have to give them kudos for doing things that rarely any writer dares to do.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Some people are already complaining that "Ruby" is back in Supernatural. Guys, as far as I can tell from these spoilers, it's not Ruby, it's just Genevieve playing Genevieve. The boys probably think it's Ruby though. :D

    I for one can't wait to see this episode.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Absolutely!
    That's why I said "in a very good way"...I can't wait to see it!

    ReplyDelete
  9. lmao can you imagine Dean's reaction when he finds out Ruby is Sam's wife? freaking out, much? ;P

    I love those crazy SPN people. Suddenly "sitting in a laundromat reading about myself sitting in a laundromat reading about myself" doesn't seem that much of a headache anymore ;)

    ReplyDelete
  10. I for one cannot wait to see the look on Sam's face when he wakes up next to Ruby. #Priceless. I am very much looking forward to this episode.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Why the hell do I still have this Santa hat on my head? GET IT OFF!!!

    ReplyDelete
  12. O.O!!! I'm slapping myself. I'm an idiot. I completely forgot about Dean's reaction to the "Ruby Situation". I was thinking about Sam's all this time. LOL! Ok...REALLY looking forward to this one.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Oh yea! That will a nice chance for those that just casually watch the show to notice the voice change with Cas/Misha. (ignore that slash please guys XD)

    I must stop. I'm getting all excited. I can't do this.

    ReplyDelete
  14. How do you mean, in your avy?

    ReplyDelete
  15. oh my at the Supernatural spoiler! Breaking the fourth wall is a very brave move but I have confidence if anyone can pull it off, it's the Supernatural team, cannot wait to see that one :D

    Loving the sound of Booth and Brennan spending Valentine’s Day together. Alone. bit too :D

    ReplyDelete
  16. I'm thinking the episode might flip back and forth b/w the blueverse and redverse, similar to the way Entrada did, OR they are separate episodes. I think it will be one episode exploring how the consequences of Walter's actions effected both worlds and the resulting childhood troubles for Olivia--resulting from her experiences at home and the drug trials (the cortexiphan trials were in 1983 and Peter died and was taken in 1985)--and Peter. Olivia's issues started in 83' with the experimentation on her. I'm wondering if they are going to explore both Peters, since their story overlaps so much. I think Altivia had a happier home life, but who knows. We still don't know what happened to Olivia's birth father if she ever knew him. Same for Altivia. Maybe they have a similar story there that might explain Altivia's toughness, though that can be explained by the constant state of emergency they have to deal with Over There. As usual, I guess we'll see it when we see it.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I hope he's not serious about Torchwood being based in Bruce WIllis' malibu home. >.> I for one can't wait until the new series is on.

    I also can't wait for that Supernatural episode! It sounds so awesome, I hope we get Jim/MIsha in, that'll be sooo funny. Too bad we couldn't get Danneel to guest star. lol @ Gen/Ruby I can't wait until their reaction.

    and jeeze, what a Smallville scoop. Chloe's entrance is "badass" and "matrix-like" I wonder what that means? I can't wait until she comes back, she's always been my favorite character, can't wait for all the chollie scenes. <33

    ReplyDelete
  18. This episode of Supernatural will either extremely bad or incredibly awesomely wonderful.......based on everything I know about SPN and its phenomenal writers (and actors, and directors, and crew and everyone else involved) - I'd say incredibly awesomely wonderful <3

    ReplyDelete
  19. It might just be the pessimist in me but, I think it's gonna go horribly wrong!

    ReplyDelete
  20. That episode simply can't and won't be bad!!:) When they figure out something this crazy and awesome, I'm positive that there's no way they can screw this up...

    ReplyDelete
  21. I hope Bobby is Jim but I think they are going to need Cas to bail themout of where ever they're stuck :)

    ReplyDelete
  22. I bet it will add more to the story line in a good way becasue angels definately have to be behind this and I'm dying to know more about the angels and whats going on in heaven :)

    ReplyDelete
  23. I was kinda hoping it was Gabe .......because we haven't had enough characters returning from the dead :P

    ReplyDelete
  24. I am SOOOO excited to see Genevieve back! I can't wait. This episode is going to be downright hysterical. Over at supernatural.tv forums, we've been discussing the possibilities this episode might present and laughing our asses off. I know in TV Guide magazine it said that this ep is supposed to be humor-heavy, so I really look forward to seeing what it'll bring us. I can't wait! And YAY GEN!! *squee*

    ReplyDelete
  25. I wonder what the Bones proposals will be.... Sweets and Daisy, I believe is the obvious one.

    I really really really hope Booths not gonna propose to Hannah. I just don't see him being that kind of guy..he'd be denying his feelings for Brennan and he's too good of a guy to do that. Ahhh plus it would break Brennan's heart....

    Who could the second proposal be?

    ReplyDelete
  26. I actually don't hope it's Gabe... that was a hugely meaningful death to me and bringing him back would cheapen the consequences. I don't know. To quote Dean Winchester, "What's dead should stay dead. Unless you're me."

    However, that's not to say I wouldn't like to see him back, albeit as a spirit or ghost... maybe we could see him in purgatory? :)

    ReplyDelete
  27. oh bummer. I'd love to see their reaction to someone who looks like Cas but acts like Misha ;) if that makes any sense, since Cas originally looks like Misha... because he is Misha... ok, I'm oficially confused lol so much for the meta understanding :P

    anyway, I think I'm gonna love it :)

    ReplyDelete
  28. No way. So far, they've dealt wonderfully with meta episodes (where's Dahne? I wanna know what she thinks about this meta heavy episode :P). Think about The Monster at the End of This Book, Changing Channels and The Real Ghostbusters. I loved them all and this episode seems just like another one like them - yet way more crazy ;) I love crazy!! (btw, if they continue like this, season 6 is definitely gonna be the most INSANE of all. Fairies, dragons and now this?).

    ReplyDelete
  29. I can't wait for this episode I'm so excited should be hilarious!

    ReplyDelete
  30. I can't wait for this episode of Supernatural its going to be hilarious!!

    ReplyDelete
  31. I miss Gabriel to! Unfortunately I think it will be Raphiel or Bathazar because it would make more sense if it was them and if Gabe did it, it would be sort of a repeat story line :(. On a side note, I'm definately missing some dead characters also and want to see them come back, :D

    ReplyDelete
  32. I wouldn't mind if Misha played Cas and AltMisha at the same time! :D

    ReplyDelete
  33. my google account does that too... weird!

    ReplyDelete
  34. Horribly wrong does not begin to describe how I feel about this episode. I loathe meta; I think this meta episode sounds worse than the others put together. I hate on principle breaking any of these freaking walls and I can't wait until this one is over. I will be watching it like usual but if its complete junk I refuse to recap it. Tag team Wilson - YOU'RE IT!

    Of course that may be the pessimist in me. One good thing, I hate this episode so much in my mind that it can only go up from here.

    ReplyDelete
  35. See opinion above. Warning - not shy about my opinion on this one. However, I don't see Changing Channels as meta. Sure it poked fun at Supernatural's competitors but it was more of a Trickster/Gabriel tale. Those I love. So help me though if they hint at, mention, or even go near the topic of Wincest or Destiel in this new episode I'm going to have an aneurysm. My brain will literally be bleeding. If Becky is on, I'm muting. In fact, if I hear hint of any of these, it will be the first time in 6 years that I won't be recording Supernatural.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Dahne STOP! The optimist in you is showing! :D
    But it is true! when this episode does show the cushion will be my best friend!

    ReplyDelete
  37. If I remember correctly this METE episode of SPN was mentioned by both Misha Collins and Sera Gamble some time ago, I also vaguely remember a spoiler about an angel assassin from the future? Maybe these two spoilers are linked?

    I'm gonna go see if I kind find that spoiler.............................

    ReplyDelete
  38. As you may or may not have heard, a late winter episode will obliterate the fourth wall by transporting Sam and Dean to an alt-uni where they are actors named Jensen Ackles and Jared Padalecki starring in a cult TV show called Supernatural. Wait, it gets wink-winkier: In this other dimension, Sam/Jared has a wife — and it’s none other than Padalecki’s real-life bride (and former ‘Supe costar) Genevieve Cortese!

    SERA GAMBLE YOU ARE CRAZY INSANE AND I LOVE YOU! omg, I already have the awesome vibe coming out of this ep!! OMG and if Genevieve is playing.. hum herself its gonna be SO WEIRD and perfect omg RUBY ahahhaha! oh gosh. I LOVE THIS

    ReplyDelete
  39. I KNOW! :DDD I'm trying not to get to excited about this cause well... it is BONES... They could just be workin a case. season 4 : "they will be in bed" and look how that turned out HHAHAH

    ReplyDelete
  40. SLASH! what did you say? oh ignore sorry *cough* okay sorry random but I was looking for fics last night and WTF Jimmy/Cas ? any way ahhaha, you made me think of that

    Gosh if Misha isnt in this as MISHA Collins I will be a little desapointed no matter how this turns out. Sorry writers to many funny moments that will be lost if you dont do it. DO IT! And poor little misha will be happy to speak like a normal person ahaha

    ReplyDelete
  41. tsk tsk tsk, sometimes I'm not proud of us.

    But I'm so freakin' happy that Genevieve is back i LOVE her

    ReplyDelete
  42. Dean will just think he is in the futur again PWAHAHAHHA!

    ReplyDelete
  43. LOL YES PLEASE! I wish every one would play themself... exept Jared and Jensen cause even if it would be AWESOME in theory, watching it would be way to weird. At least Misha/Cas and Misha/misha wouldnt like talk to each other... okay this is way to hard ahahah.

    I CANT WAIT!

    ReplyDelete
  44. OH! They ARE themself? (is it themselves of themself sorry and thanks lol) OKAY IM CONFUSED! Help cause if that's it then ITS EVEN AWESOMER OMG!

    So explaination: I thought they would be in the alter.Universe were there is a Jensen and Jared, not that they are jensen and jared... (that does not sound like explanation to me.... wow. head ake)

    ReplyDelete
  45. LOL Oh you make my day with your comments HAHAHHA.
    AW and I would pay for a wincest or destiel comments :DDDDD Just to see Dean's face (dean dean not Jensen jensen... oh gosh)

    ReplyDelete
  46. I dont get how you can't be exited about this HAHHA! (though I did HATE ghostfacers and thought every one hated it until I found this site.... argh) C'MON it is AWESOME! AWESOME AWESOME!

    But yeah pessimist is the way to go so the ep will be watchable if you REALLY dont like meta. tsktsktsk Please make a review, I feel that even if its a VERY bad one it will be hilarious for someone who loved the ep (cause I will!)

    ReplyDelete
  47. lol is it wrong that I actually find your meta-hating entertaining? :P

    But honestly, why do you hate it that much? Just curious. For me being able to play games with the fans this way is what makes a show great. Not everyone would be brave enough to carry out an idea like this. SPN did it several times and succeeded.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Oh, if I hate it, I'll review it on my blog and probably make a lot of people angry. But recapping usually takes me 5+ hours and I'm not spending that amount of time on something I truly despise. Of course, this is all premature. It could be that I find it the best episode they ever made - but I'm not holding my breath. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  49. I'm glad you find it entertaining and not annoying. I forget to use my tactful words when I'm really passionate about something. I guess saying I hate meta is misleading because I don't hate all meta. I loved when Crowley said, "Castiel, haven't seen you all season." It was brilliant. A funny side note that stayed in character and did not change the storyline or detract from it. I love the little fan winks they add in, especially when it could go right over a non-fan's head and they wouldn't know they missed something. Then it's meta within the show and not meta for meta's sake. It's when forced meta changes the show that I cannot abide it, the "meta episodes" if you will. But even here my definition differs from what that apparently means to many people at SpoilerTV. I do not see Changing Channels as a "meta episode". It was funny how they used Supernatural's competitors in the story and I enjoyed the little digs. But still, those were a very small part of a big episode. They weren't even all of the TV shows they mocked. The storyline would essentially have been the same if they had mocked Glee or American Idol and thus it doesn't qualify for me. And I am baffled that anyone considers WIaWSNB as meta. I don't see that at all.
    Even Ghostfacers doesn't count as a "meta episode" for me because it is more a parody of "real ghostbusting" shows than anything else. I don't find these any more meta than Live Free or Twihard.

    For me, a "meta episode" is one in which the meta drives the show, where it is the plot, and when it alters the cannon of the show. I loathe these. The prime example is The Monster at the End of This Book. Once this episode, made purely to meta with the fans, aired, it could not be taken back. We were forever stuck with the notion that thousands of people know Dean and Sam's story and that they think it is fiction. I'm not sure how to verbalize all the bad that comes with this idea. Let's suffice to say it lead to Becky, the most annoying character this show has ever produced. And with Becky came the canonization of Wincest. If for no other reason, this is proof that "meta episodes" and especially meta characters must die. I'm not explaining this section well. Sorry.

    The final reason why I hate "meta episodes" is that they take me out of the Winchester world and back into my own life. Quite frankly my life is not that exciting. I watch Supernatural to see their lives. Yes, I laughed and gasped when they used sympatico's name in the episode. I had many great conversations with her and others during the season 1 hellatus. I knew her opinions and on many occasions shared them. However, that whole thing sucked me right out of the story and into memories of that interminable hiatus. I had left the Winchester world and there's something wrong about the show doing that. Having an entire episode of inside jokes makes some people feel more like a part of the story. For me, it takes me right out of it.

    ReplyDelete
  50. If you refuse to recap, I will step in. I don't hate meta, but I do hate horribly-wrought meta...and I don't know...I don't ever wanna see Becky again, but I always thought it was funny how because she was such a fan, she knew where the colt was and helped the brothers out... anyway... lol

    ReplyDelete
  51. Well, I thought that episode was excellent for what it was...I think it could've been a huge trainwreck, but instead it was a weird way to introduce prophets, and archangels, and we even got a glimpse of what Lilith was up to... anyway, is it bad for those people in the show (the thousands that read the books) to not always realize that something is real and going on around them? I mean, you could say the same about the millions of people that watch the tv show... Also, it's possible that this tv show episode isn't going to be as bad as the episode with the alt universe full of EFFING FAIRIES...(What is this, Charmed or something?!)

    I mean...we haven't even made it through the dragon episode yet, so don't get too passionate about it yet lol...I do know what you mean however...that's what I was TRYING to say.

    ReplyDelete
  52. yh ur prob right!, but, i cant help it :PPP

    ReplyDelete
  53. maybe cam and that dr. to michelle...

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.