Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Television: The Greatest Art Form Of All Time?


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Television: The Greatest Art Form Of All Time?

5 Jun 2010

Share on Reddit
Hey everyone! Some of you may know me from over at DarkUFO. If not, my name is John and it's nice to meet you all! I usually go by Cadence in the comments section. When I saw that SpoilerTV was looking for writers, I jumped at the opportunity. After an episode of one of my favourite shows has aired, I often sit down at my computer and write a mini-essay. Since I’m going to be writing anyway, I figured why not try and share my thoughts with people who care about television just as passionately!?

I’ve never really written anything in a public forum before, so this is my first foray into the world of blogging. I thought that my first entry would be an article about why I think that television might be the highest form of art. Feel free to ignore my pseudo-intellectual rambling, but I truly hope that you enjoy what you read.



There are three things that I love about television.

The first is that television combines several distinct art forms into one incredible whole. No other medium allows people to tell stories as long and as well paced as a novel, while essentially being a high-end theatre production with musical accompaniment. As a musician, I take a very keen interest in a show’s soundtrack. When television is done right, it has the ability to transcend all other forms of art. It’s similar to how Wagner combined music with drama into what was called a “Gesamtkunstwerk,” which means something along the lines of “Total Art Work.” That may sound like a presumptuous comparison to make, but I guess that’s how deep my passion for television runs. This by no means implies that all television is anywhere close to the ideal; however, there are some shows that certainly find themselves near that terriotry.

The second is that television makes you think. When I say think I mean that the show tells a story that can be parsed for metaphors and thematic content. A lot of shows are well paced, well written, and can bring forth strong emotions (see the paragraph below), but they often lack that special something that elevates a show above the average. I think that this is worth noting because a lot of television doesn’t do anything of the sort. I can be moved without thought, but once I'm over whatever I'm feeling, it's nice to be left with something.

The third is that television moves you. Maybe you just witnessed the Grey’s Anatomy season finale and felt a great sense of unease and terror wash over you as a truly nerve-wracking episode went by. Maybe you watch Glee on a regular basis. Each week, the cast somehow lifts your spirits in a way that only a group of misfit kids with unreal real-life problems that are dealt with in song can. Maybe your favourite character on Lost has just died and you find yourself legitimately sad and, dare I say, crying inconsolably? If television can do that, then it has done it’s job.

On the whole, the emotional aspect seems to be more important than the intellectual. When I watched Across the Sea (Lost), although it made me think for hours, the hour of television itself didn’t truly move me. I wasn't particularly attached to the characters of young Jacob and young MIB and later on, when they had grown up, too much information was packed into the remaining half hour. Although the general experience of sitting around and thinking was very enjoyable, the hour spent watching was far less exciting. The best possible episode is one that combines both emotional satisfaction with a lot to think about. This may be why I absolutely loved the lost finale.

Some shows make you feel (Spartacus, Grey's Anatomy, Glee, Chuck, etc), while others masterfully make you feel while thinking (Lost, The Wire, Battlestar, Dollhouse, Band Of Brothers, etc).

I hope you enjoyed reading my thoughts and thanks for your time! Next time I post, I plan on discussing serialised drama versus procedurals and more episodic shows.

14 comments:

  1. I don't want to be bitching any particular show, but I really don't think that some of them have anything to do with art. They're just images and words. All the while, you get things like Mad Men, Breaking Bad, and others, that are just so beautiful and artistic. The way I see it is, television in itself isn't really an art, but it gets awfully close sometimes.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That's kind of what I'm trying to say :). You're right in that different shows have different goals. Something like Chuck shouldn't strive to make you think in the way Lost does. It's what makes Chuck fun. I'm just saying that there's an ideal that makes me the happiest and that would be shows like Lost and Battlestar.

    I don't know that I'm clever enough to really ever write a recap of something like Mad Men, but I know where you're coming from.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey John, welcome to the site and great first post :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey John good post. I hope to post some stuff one of these days as well. I like your overall argument for tv as art, but when I think of tv I can't help but think of the commercials, sweeps, and just the whole business side of it. To me TV is like the best use of money when it comes to Art but not the highest. Geez, I sound jaded. But I do want to meet you halfway tho, how about tv will be the highest form of art in the future?

    Thanks,
    CJ

    ReplyDelete
  5. Great article. I completely agree. TV does make you think, but also feel. Grey's is the perfect example of that. I rarely get through an episode without some kind of an emotional response (usually a few tears!!) You can feel for TV characters in a way that you can't for film characters. Spending 90 minutes/ 2 hours with a character is not the same as spending an entire season (say 22 episodes or about 15 hours) with them.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Absolutely! I like movies and all, but they're essentially short stories compared to the novel that is a television show.

    At the same time, television written season by season and episode by episode without a purpose or a game-plan leads to the potential for inconsistencies, which isn't something you'll find in most movies or novels. I'll talk about it more in my next article :). Thanks for reading!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Lol, you do sound jaded :P. I get where your coming from though, especially in terms of business and marketing. I completely neglected to think about. I watch a lot of things on DVD so I usually avoid them.

    Cable television doesn't have to stick to the very strict 6 act structure that the networks do. I just watch commercials hed The Pacific and Band of Brothers and each episode and act were as long as it had to be. Brilliant stuff.

    Thanks for reading and hope to see your posts!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I see that I had been reading the post a little too fast. It's true that we're kind of saying the same thing. Anyway, great post, I very much agree with that.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Nice stuff dude!
    I prefer TV as it gives the opportunity to really create characters to a level Film can't. And so if the show fails in this sense, ala Flashforward, I lose interest, and I think most people would agree with me here. haha.
    I find it weird that we are happy watching 121 hours of a certain set of characters, yet when say the third in a Trilogy of movies comes out, everyone says its a risk. We're also therefore a lot more willing to let TV broaden things.
    And so I'm with you. It's all about the feeling, and becoming invested emotionally too.
    Nice Stuff :)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thanks :).

    I'll be writing an article about episodic vs serialised storytelling soon and Flashforward is the perfect example of adhering too strictly to a serialised gameplan. As much as I love the serial style, characters and plots need to be written with backdoors in case of some sort of failure (be it actor or character chemistry, or fan reaction related). Flashforward failed to acknowledge that some of its characters were sorely lacking and had little to no chemistry on-screen or with other characters. Actors aside, much of the writing and character motivation made little sense. The writers were pandering far too much to the overall plot.

    Babylon 5 probably exemplifies the correct way to combine planned and fluid storytelling the best.

    As a final thought, I remember reading an article about Lost during the first season in which Damon Lindelof explained that the original plan was to have Michael, Sun, and Jin in a love triangle; however, Sun and Jin were received really well by the fans. Although Michael and Sun definitely had some good chemistry, it was a plot choice based on Sun and Jin's chemistry, fan reaction, and character development.

    Whether or not it was the correct choice (I certainly think it was) doesn't matter. The choice was made for the sake of character and not the plot.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I completely agree. No one seems to understand this argument. People usually think art is (and is going to be) what art is generically thought to be- sculpture, music, paintings, etc. Art is much more than that. Like Duchamp showed us, art doesn't have to be something physical, it can be a mere idea or the process of creating such art/idea/etc.

    Finally, someone that isn't afraid to argue against the nay-sayers and show them that our obsessions aren't just a bunch of images on camera combined with fluffy music, they're much, much more than that.

    Great first article! Can't wait to read some more.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Michael and Sun? Really? Hmm. I never saw nor wanted that. It's actually strange to see that. If anything, I'd rather see Sun and Jack. I know it sounds weird, but they became such good friends and their relationship continued to stay strong 'til the end (a sad, but fulfilling end).

    I can't talk about Lost anymore. If I do, I'm gonna end up killing myself and join the Losties in their little purgatory or wherever they are.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Just wanted to say thanks for posting.

    Really enjoying all the new articles the new writers are doing. Keep it up.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Thanks for the interest :). It's great to know people are reading and enjoying.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.