Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Persons Unknown - Pilot review from Beyond Hollywood


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Persons Unknown - Pilot review from Beyond Hollywood

2 Jun 2010

Share on Reddit
The first hour of Christopher McQuarrie’s first foray into television, the mystery-drama “Persons Unknown” is exactly how you would set up a TV show with a finite number of episodes (in this case 13). The premise is killer: seven strangers wake up in a hotel in a small town in the middle of nowhere. The town looks a lot like a Hollywood movie backlot, and everything there is to see can be seen from the porch of its lone hotel. There is a Chinese restaurant, a Sheriff’s office, phones that don’t work, and other stores to provide the basic necessities of life, but beyond those buildings, there are only … mountains.

As the show opens, divorcee Janet (Daisy Betts) is at the park with her 5-year old daughter when strangers abduct her. Janet, not her child. Janet wakes up in a mostly empty hotel, unsure of how she got there, where “there” is, or who the culprits are. She quickly meets Joe (Jason Wiles), another abductee, and soon the two locate others in the same predicament: the high-strung Charlie (Alan Ruck), who longs to return to his dependent wife; empathetic grief counselor Moira (Tina Holmes); tough Marine Sergeant McNair (Chadwick Boseman); happy-to-lucky car salesman Blackham (Sean O’Bryan); and party girl Tori (Kate Lang Johnson), who wakes up with one mean hangover and the best line of the pilot. Later, the hotel finds itself staffed with a night manager (Andy Greenfield), who has no idea how he got there, but only knows that he applied for a night manager’s position at a hotel and, well, got it.
The strangers quickly realize that leaving the town is impossible, thanks to precautions taken by their captors while they were unconscious. The order of the day is mystery, questions, and some hints to get the audience guessing at the reasons behind it all. Beyond the seven individuals trapped in the small ghost town, there are parallel interludes taking place in San Francisco, where a reporter (Gerald Kyd) has found clues to Janet’s abduction. As the reporter goes about his investigation, it becomes clear that he, too, is being watched. Or at least, the people he’s talking to are being monitored by the same mysterious individuals scrutinizing every movement of our seven strangers via omnipresent security cameras.

The pilot episode is written by show creator Christopher McQuarrie, and directed by TV genre vet Michael Rymer of “Battlestar Galactica” fame. The pilot is all drama, questions, and mystery, and just a little dash of action. But since a show like “Persons Unknown” is not going to live and die by its action scenes (or lack thereof), that doesn’t really become an issue. At least, in the early goings. The pilot also doesn’t offer any introductions to the bad guys whatsoever, so that’s another mystery that will surely be peeled back as the show slowly unravels. Is it one person? Two? An entire crew of people? And how do they control the people who come and go in order to keep the prisoners alive? So many questions, so few answers.

As of this review, NBC is setting up the show as a mega mini-series, with a finite number of episodes (13 in all) before the end is revealed. That seems like the best option, as an ongoing series where people can’t leave a small town would get a little redundant, not to mention stretching the premise beyond reason. This isn’t “Lost”, there is no massive island to endlessly explore, after all.
Full Review: Screen Rant

1 comment:

  1. The thing that excites me the most about this is that it is finite. Networks are so loathe to mega mini series, be they 13 eps, 2 seasons or whatever. mainly due to the high cost of starting up a show. But if this show is a reasonable success it might be just the thing to show US networks that finite can be a money maker. Especially if they are willing to commit to the whole thing hell or high water and let that commitment be known publicly.
    Because not all stories can really last 200 episodes and such. Some stories are best told quickly with no filler or fluff. No Bai Lings or Nikki and Paolo nonsense (Lost fans know what I'm talking about). Heroes was at least a 3 act story but they weren't given the power to make it such and after a pretty good start, ruined it. Kidnapped would have been an awesome 'Brit style' show with a caper a series told in 12 tight hours. but NBC wouldn't do that from the start and it didn't have a chance.

    Other nets are just as bad with their stuff. the internet has shortened many attention spans and taught folks a lot about good storytelling. Those with the magic box and the blogs are more selective about what they watch. And they have been exposed to the way things are on cable and overseas. The networks will have to step up in a lot of ways to stay in business. Changing the rules of storytelling is one step (changing the ratings system is another)

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.