Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Agents of SHIELD - Season 3 - Chloe Bennet Teases Daisy Johnson Transformation


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Agents of SHIELD - Season 3 - Chloe Bennet Teases Daisy Johnson Transformation

22 Jul 2015

Share on Reddit


Chloe Bennet Responding to Twitter Comments :)















The #daisyjohnson transformation is beginning. 💇🏻 #AgentsofSHIELD @clarisshair

A video posted by Chloe Bennet (@chloebennet4) on

157 comments:

  1. Ugh, they are ruining everything I love about Skye. The name thing I was furious about but now Daisy has completely overwhelmed Skye. Just because she met her psychopathic murdering biological parents does not mean Skye has to completely change her whole identity. It's disgusting what they're doing to her.

    This show continues to fail at dealing with issues of self-identity, abuse, and brainwashing.

    I love Skye and Ward so much I'm sticking around for them (I love the others too but these two are my favorites) and I am displeased with what they're doing to both.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm totally and completely agree with you. Seriously I want to scream OMG what the heck? AOS is completely different from the beginning.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You say that like it's a bad thing. This is the MCU. Actually this is Marvel. The only thing constant is change. Change is necessary for good storytelling. I'm perfectly fine with characters growing. Nothing stays the same. That's life.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Except the characters aren't growing. 2B was an out of character disaster for everyone involved (literally all of them got screwed over at some point) and it seems like the trend is continuing.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ik that but those changes is happening all at once and we don't have time to adjust so please understand that.

    ReplyDelete
  6. No, the characters were out of character that was character development. I know you won't see it that way. You refuse to see it that way. So let the rest of us enjoyed the way things are now. Bitterness is unproductive. Anger is restrictive.

    ReplyDelete
  7. LOL, every time I think I'm okay again and think things will be fine, the show does something new that makes me angry.

    And check Chloe's mentions. There are a lot of upset people.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I know sometimes it's hard to adjust to major changes, but in the grand scheme of things it's just a haircut. There are worse things to have to adjust to such as having your entire town wiped out by a flood or getting a text message at 2 AM telling you that your brother-in-law has stage IV cancer. In the world of the show, Coulson losing his hand is a much bigger change then Skye/Daisy getting a new hairstyle or even using a different alias (especially because she's a spy and spies change their appearance and name all the time).

    ReplyDelete
  9. Noooo! They are making a gorgeous stunning girl uglier each season:( Season 1 <3 Season 2 bangs :S Season 3 short :( (only some women pull that look off without being a bit boyish)... And DAISY... She will ALWAYS be Skye to me. She been Skye for 27 years, why change. I get that Daisy Johnson is the comic book character but I still hoped her identity wouldn't change at least anymore. She just keeps transforming :/

    ReplyDelete
  10. sunnygreendale22 July 2015 at 01:01

    it's a haircut. I understand your concern. I too would hate to see the Skye we know disappear for the sake of adding a comic book character to the show. But a haircut is a superficial change, and while it might be fan service, I think it's ultimately harmless. I'd wait until the season premiere at least before jumping to conclusions.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I actually think a completely different look for somebody who's trying to stay off the radar is a good idea. Actually I think shorthair for someone who does a lot of combat is a good ideal and I've always wondered why so many female comic book characters have long flowing hair. Isn't that a little dangerous? Also the character is a spy. Spies change their look and use different names all the time. Keeping the same appearance and even the same name could put her at risk. Hydra knows what she looks like and she has superpowers. That makes her a big target. Maybe a different hairstyle could keep her from getting kidnapped. There are logical explanations for this.

    ReplyDelete
  12. It's not just a haircut as I said - it's the name thing too. Daisy Johnson is swamping Skye and it's obvious already.

    I'm waiting to see how it plays out but if it happens exactly as I fear, I'm going to be even more upset.

    ReplyDelete
  13. sunnygreendale22 July 2015 at 01:08

    Many people are also ecstatic. I personally don't care one way or the other. The writers can't make everyone happy. Also, I've said it before and I'll say it again, if you want to actually have a discussion about this, citing that other people agree with you doesn't do anything to get your point across. Take the time to explain your own opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  14. That she hasn't been Skye for 27 years. She was Daisy for the first year of her life. Mary Sue from childhood on to her early teenage years. We actually have no idea how long she was using Skye as an alias. But it's just that, an alias. Skye is a spy. Name changes and new hairstyles are normal for that lifestyle.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I'm okay with it too. Actually, the more I think about it the more it makes sense. Hydra knows her name and knows what she looks like. With her powers, you know that they would want her. Using a different name and changing her appearance drastically may help keep her from getting kidnapped.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I feared that Daisy Johnson would swamp Skye - I didn't mind that Skye was Daisy at first but didn't want that to happen - and it looks like my worst fears are coming true. First the name thing (why exactly would Skye feel uncomfortable with a name she chose herself? She felt uncomfortable as Mary Sue Poots which is why she changed it in the first place. And why exactly does she owe anything to one parent who literally tried to murder her and the other who wanted to murder all her friends?) and now the haircut. The Skye I loved is gone and now it seems like she's someone completely different.

    ReplyDelete
  17. sunnygreendale22 July 2015 at 01:13

    Well, i already explained my thoughts on the name change. While you may not agree with it, the fact that she's doing it to honor her father proves that she is not the character from the comics. If I'm wrong and that does happen, I'll be just as upset. But so far we have little information to go on. Watching the next episode should give us a better idea.

    ReplyDelete
  18. She will always be Skye to me.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Actually it looks like they're probably going to go with the more recent version of the character with slightly longer hair from Shield #7 which I think Chloe can pull off beautifully. I tried to find a picture of it, but I couldn't.

    ReplyDelete
  20. The fact that she's doing it to honor her father - the one who tried to murder all her friends - makes no sense to me, tbh.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Honestly, I thought her bangs in season 2 were an improvement over season 1

    ReplyDelete
  22. I just shared this as a general look for people who don't know since its a bit hard to find other photos :)

    ReplyDelete
  23. I know this is the top image that popped out. If I could screenshot something from my own comic book I would. I really did like this latest book.

    ReplyDelete
  24. But you support Ward, who tried to murder all her friends along with innocent civillians... That makes no sense to me.

    Hell Cal has vastly more reason to kill than Ward.

    ReplyDelete
  25. sunnygreendale22 July 2015 at 01:24

    Forgiveness is often more about the person doing the forgiving. Skye desperately wanted to find her parents and get answers to who she was. Her mother may have been pretty far gone, but Cal did love her, he did put her first in the end, and he did show that there was good in him. Maybe that was all Skye/Daisy needed. Again, Ward has tried to kill Hunter, Bobbi, May, Fitz, and Simmons, yet you want Skye to forgive him. That's fine. Even if some people disagree with you you're aloud to have that opinion, for no other reason than you like Ward as a character. Now think about how much Skye's desire for a nice, normal, happy family means to her. If there's some aspect of that that she can cling to, not matter how thin, doesn't it make sense that she would?

    ReplyDelete
  26. No they didn't get screwed. They grew, they developed, that's what happens in any show that survives.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Every show that survives grows and changes from the pilot. Skye was the growth character from the start, it was clear her story would reshape her even then.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I really want to see the end result, but clearly this has been coming for a while, she and Luke had tweeter comments about it a while back, in jest or in knowledge is the question.

    ReplyDelete
  29. sunnygreendale22 July 2015 at 01:35

    Even if it doesn't make sense to you, it's still proof that she's different from the comic book character.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Well apparently it's not that short, Chloe just tweeted about it and she said that they're doing a tv version of it.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Exactly they've always tweaked the lore, and I'm fine with that.

    ReplyDelete
  32. In other AOS news of the not hair varity, Jamie Alexander suggested that AOS will also have Easter Eggs for Thor 3 along withy the movies...

    ReplyDelete
  33. I assumed it would be consistent with the latest version of the character from issue SHIELD #7. They took great pains in that issue to make all the characters look like their television counterpart. In that Daisy's hair was somewhat short, but not really.

    ReplyDelete
  34. I saw that. I wonder if it's already happened. I'm terrified at the thought that Coulson's murderer probably knows that he's alive. I also love the fact that she mentioned Agents of SHIELD first before the other sources. It made me feel like she values the show. I hope she's in another episode this season. It needs to become a tradition.

    ReplyDelete
  35. I know, I'm now back to rethinking the last season and like you hoping she's back again (would love to see her and Daisy now that she has control). The only issue I have with her new show (which looks interesting to me) is if it impacts her availabilty for AOS (I know silly but...), I'd love a Sif a season tradition alright.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Short hair? Interesting choice. It will be harder for the stunt people, but it might make her look more athletic.

    ReplyDelete
  37. I don't think it would be that much of a problem. Amy Acker managed to do an episode despite being on POI at the time. J August Richards came back despite all the projects he's been working on. You never know.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Will have or already had? Because Sif popped up twice already in AoS at the behest of LokiOdin, the first of which made everyone wonder if Amora/Enchantress would be the villain of Thor:Ragnarok given how Lorelei is her sister.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Good point Sir, it would be crazy if a Thor 3 egg was that far back, but it's Marvel so it could very well be. That would be kind of cool I think.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Terrified? I'd LOVE for Loki to find out he'd been cheated of the credit of killing Coulson and try to do it again only to get his *** handled to him in return. :)

    ReplyDelete
  41. Ikr, AOS has had some of the greatest character development.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Completely agree, whether you like it or not, all the characters have developed from what we saw in 1A. To me all of it fits and flows naturally and gives us interesting characters across the board.

    ReplyDelete
  43. I don't get why people are freaking out. It's HAIRCUT for god's sake.

    ReplyDelete
  44. I think part of the problem is people are used to TV shows and movies where characters don't change at all to the point where they become stagnant or characters of their selves. You're not provided with the opportunity to see how major events affect the character because in the next episode they are back to exactly how they were before, as if nothing happened. That doesn't happen on AOS. For example, we got to see Fitz deal with what happened to him as any real person would. We got to see his frustration at not being able to do the things he used to do and see him adjust to his new normal. I'm very grateful for that being a member of the disabled community.

    ReplyDelete
  45. I'm tempted to claim 'first world problems'. We have way too much time on our hands.

    ReplyDelete
  46. That and we're fans I guess...

    ReplyDelete
  47. Which can be a very dangerous combination sometimes.

    ReplyDelete
  48. She will rock teh short hair

    ReplyDelete
  49. Completely agree with you, for example while I gave watching NCIS, Tony petty much never outgrew the playboy character for the 7 seasons I watched, it was always the women. At some point it just got boring and repetitive.

    AOS has development, both major and minor (just May's change over what SKye told her about Barhain), and I had actually just been thinking about Fitz's injury as an example. You didn't just have him dealing with how to deal with this massive life changing injury, but you also got to see how everyone else of his "family" had to deal with it to, with varying degrees of success. Thought it was brilliant acting all round.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Can't really disagree with you there...

    ReplyDelete
  51. sunnygreendale22 July 2015 at 03:08

    That's an excellent point. And it just goes to show that there are several different possible reasons for why Skye is changing her name/hair.


    Also, people seem to forget that Skye changed a lot between seasons one and two as well, but Chloe Bennet managed to make the character feel consistent then and I have faith that she'll do it again.

    ReplyDelete
  52. A very good point, Skye the Shield agent was very different to Skye the consultant, and it worked. Let's wait and see...

    ReplyDelete
  53. sunnygreendale22 July 2015 at 03:26

    Ikr. So different! it took me quite a while to get used to those bangs, but I think she pulled them off. :)

    ReplyDelete
  54. Well played sir!

    ReplyDelete
  55. Stephen S. Bowman22 July 2015 at 04:43

    really again with the name change she was Daisy Johnson first in the comics and since this show is about the comics here name from the comics comes first no question asked

    ReplyDelete
  56. They aren't ruining everything you love about Skye. Skye is evolving. She's evolving into who she WANTS to be. Skye has always been Daisy, and after years of searching she finally realized that. So now, she can close that chapter of her life asking "Who I am?" to "Who is Daisy Johnson and how do I grow into myself more?"


    Sure Cal may have had a hand in her deciding to take her real name, but not that much. I can't believe you defend Ward's actions and then you criticize Cal's actions who is arguably 10x more redeemable than Ward is. Although Skye and Cal got off to a wrong start, it was honestly just a lack of communication and understanding. However, I feel like if Cal is to ever comeback and regains his memories he might be more of a villain...but we will deal with that if that even happens.


    She's not changing her identity because she found out who her parents were. To her, Skye was always another alias. Daisy Johnson is who she is, Skye wants to be herself. She was Daisy when she was born, and she was Skye most of the show but she wants to be who she was born to be, Daisy Johnson.

    ReplyDelete
  57. She has always been Daisy. She just didn't know it yet. She's not going to be a totally new character. Just a new version of herself.

    And seeing her trying to live this life, without losing who she is at her core, is going to make some great TV.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Looking forward to seeing it.

    ReplyDelete
  59. I'm excited. They must start shooting season three soon?

    ReplyDelete
  60. Can't wait. Chloe's gonna look awesome.

    ReplyDelete
  61. They've posted photo's of the trailers arriving on set, so I'm guessing within the next couple of weeks at the most.

    ReplyDelete
  62. I wonder what Chloe's look will be. Hope it won't be too short (like her hair longer).

    Very excited for the new season to start. Looking forward to seeing the BTS pics of the cast.

    ReplyDelete
  63. I'm definitely a girl, I completely freaked out about it

    ReplyDelete
  64. Ooh, I'm curious what her haircut will be like. And I NEED her to get the Quake suit from the comics. The casts Simmons made her were clearly an early prototype of the Quake gauntlets, and Fitz can make a suit like that in his sleep.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Coulson needs to get his revenge. And it needs to be glorious. Not least of which because I find Loki an overgrown bratty child who's long overdue a slap in the face back to reality.

    ReplyDelete
  66. The funny thing is, I always groan at the unbelievability of female action stars not bothering to pull their hair back/up when heading into battle, and AoS is no exception with that. Cutting her hair is another way to do that, I guess...

    ReplyDelete
  67. We have to see how it's written, but Chloe says that adopting her birth name is representative of her finally learning the truth, as painful as it was, about where she came from and closing the door on that chapter. The name "Skye" is tied to a part of her life that's now over, the search for answers. It'll obviously take time for we fans to get used to the name change, but if done correctly, I think it can certainly be realistic.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Personally, I dislike the bangs (not a lot of women can pull these off IMO) and prefer her S1 hairstyle, but I didn't claim the entire second season was going to suck before it had even started because of them. Then again, I don't have some kind of agenda to diss everything about the show because they aren't conforming to my personal view of some characters.

    ReplyDelete
  69. The show AoS was in the beginning was pummeled by viewers and critics alike and lost a gigantic chunk of its audience. The vast majority of the changes have been for the better, I'll say.

    ReplyDelete
  70. It's just a look change right? I hope Chloe portray the character well.

    ReplyDelete
  71. He had one of that already, thanks to Hulk! :P

    ReplyDelete
  72. And as has been pointed out she's already been growing. I think it's fair to say that the Skye of 2.01 was already a different character than even Skye of 1.22, certainly vastly different from 1.01

    ReplyDelete
  73. Yeah, and it was awesome, but as per Thor: The Dark World he sure hasn't learn his lesson, so another such moment couldn't hurt. 😀

    ReplyDelete
  74. That would be cool but I wonder will they make us wait until further in on the season?

    ReplyDelete
  75. I don't know, thought the bangs made her look more mature than her Season 1 look where she did look like somebodys kid sister in some episodes. But either way I'm not going to freak about a haircut style as some form of a major statement on the show or the character.

    ReplyDelete
  76. This show is not about the comics. The MCU as a whole is loosely based on the comics. Daisy Johnson isn't biracial in the comics but Skye is on the show.

    ReplyDelete
  77. Maybe Coulson could have Daisy "Quake" him, I could just imagine Loki's look of surprise.

    ReplyDelete
  78. It's a change for her but I think she'll be good with it like that. I'd guess they'd been talking about it for a while.

    ReplyDelete
  79. A fair point, while it gives great TV like Bobbi's first fight scene with the Hydra goons, it's not exactly great ( I mean how many bloopers have you seen with women eating their own hair...)

    ReplyDelete
  80. Season three starts filming tomorrow.

    ReplyDelete
  81. And Daisy Johnson is an important figure in the lore, just as Daisy will be in the show dealing with the Secret Warriors. Since they have picked "Quake" to be what Skye becomes it makes sense to go the full way and have her take the name Daisy.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Well if she hasn't posted a pic by then the BTS photo's should give us a view. Hope Ming-Na is feeling better...

    ReplyDelete
  83. Christopher DeBono22 July 2015 at 13:18

    Yeah they're probably going to make her look a bit closer to her comic book character by cutting and styling her hair in a similar fashion.

    ReplyDelete
  84. Oh yeah, without the women having their hair down, we wouldn't be able to have the classic hair flip at the end of the fight like Bobbi did in that scene... LOL.

    ReplyDelete
  85. It did add to the Bad ass moment, but yeah it's a trade off for Good TV. And honestly since we get more strong female characters I can live with it...

    ReplyDelete
  86. Unless Nick can grow a beard quily, I'm guessing Hunter is going to be clean shaven this season.

    ReplyDelete
  87. Yeah, something tells me they'll make us a wait a bit longer, or they'd already be flashing around concept art of the suit. (Although it's always possible the reveal will be as part of the promotional photoshoot for S3.) They may not feel that Skye is far enough in her evolution into a superheroine to get the suit, or even go by "Quake" (they've confirmed she'll call herself Daisy but I don't think the same has been said for the code name). If so, while I want to see her in the suit already, I also appreciate that they're taking the time to properly develop the character before she takes on a superheroine identity, which is a pretty big deal.


    Just a few days ago I cited Arrow as an example of doing it wrong with their "everything but the kitchen sink" approach - namely, let's throw as many characters as possible into superhero costumes and give them superhero names, as if that will be awesome in itself and the journey isn't important. Not that they didn't try to give their characters any kind of journeys, but they were rushed and unsatisfying in the grand scheme of things, unlike AoS where the truly tactonic shift in Skye's character over the past 2 years has been believable. So if they need to take their time to do things right, that's fine by me.

    ReplyDelete
  88. Please, no. I respect that Nick likes the baby face look in his private life, but I want my sexy bearded Hunter. :(


    LOL.

    ReplyDelete
  89. He does look really different without the beard but I think we are going to have to live with it. I can't see how it would be beyond stuble at this point even if he started growing it out post Comic Con.

    You just this conversation and the thread itself gives you another feeling for actors and what they deal with. There's an online debate about a guy shaving and a woman's hairstyle...

    ReplyDelete
  90. A lot of people just take every new bit of information presented to them as further evidence of things they'd already believed in. That's what happens when your opinions or beliefs stiffen into dogma, which can't be questioned no matter what. So when you're dead-set on the notion that a character has been (or will be) badly written, even something as insignifcant as a haircut will be enough to reaffirm that belief in your mind.

    ReplyDelete
  91. May I say that I love your username. Well I want to see her so I could calm myself down lol

    ReplyDelete
  92. Anything works, but I really want Coulson himself to kick Loki's ass. Obviously, an ordinary human is at a severe disadvantage in a fight against an Asgardian, but I'm sure he can find a nifty weapon like "Bambino" (a.k.a. the Destroyer gun) or that thing that dissolved Garrett to balance the playing field.

    ReplyDelete
  93. I'll miss my long-haired Skye.

    ReplyDelete
  94. BTW, if you're looking for a good show to watch with kickass and complex women, Nikita which ended a couple of years ago is a great choice. The second half of Season 1 and the entirety of Season 2 are some of the best TV I've ever seen, and it's incredible how much female characters and the relationships between them drive the narrative (apart from the fact that they kick inordinate amounts of ass, physically and otherwise), which is still rare on TV. The reason I just thought of it is that the heroine, Nikita, actually DID have her hair in a ponytail or bun pretty often when going out to fight, which I appreciated. Heh.

    ReplyDelete
  95. It goes back to the point you made about how fan service is no problem as long as it doesn't alter the creative direction of the show in a meaningful way. Sure, the reason they've asked Chloe to cut her hair is almost certainly to give her Daisy's look in the comics, but honestly - who cares? It's not like it's some major storytelling decision.


    To give an example to the contrary: it's my understanding that Call is a full-on villain in the comics and has no positive relationship with his daughter whatsoever. Yet as S2 wore on, we saw that the AoS version of Cal was a humanized and tragic villain, and the relationship between he and Skye, while highly problematic and dysfunctional, was deeply moving in a way. I would've hated for them to fully vilify Cal and destroy the Skye/Cal relationship for the sake of being true to the comics, thus wasting Kyle MacLachlan's immense talent - and they didn't. So they clearly have the sense to know when something is important enough to justify deviating from the source material, and when it isn't.

    ReplyDelete
  96. And as I've said before, CAL IS CRAZY. I'm not sure how anyone could've gotten the impression that a man in his 50's who giddily declares "Best day ever!" before going to kill someone for revenge, or dances in joy when he discovers his daughter got superpowers, or tries to take down an entire spy agency with a few walks-ins from the street who have lame powers, or starts singing "A Bicycle Built for Two" to himself while a prisoner on a plane, is completely normal and sane. His mental state might not have been bad enough for him to get away with his crimes in a court of law, but he was sure as hell less sane and rational than Ward. Can you imagine someone like Cal on an undercover mission inside SHIELD for years?

    ReplyDelete
  97. I give them so much credit for Fitz's arc in S2, it's not common for shows to deal with disability in a way that's so realistic and dignified. (And with Coulson losing his hand, that's already three main cast members with disabilities between AoS and Agent Carter, so: respect, Marvel.) Iain said at the Comic-Con panel that he did some research into the effects of brain damage while the majority was done by the writers, and I have no trouble believing they went to the effort because I've seen little but wall-to-wall praise for his performance and the writing.


    I'm also impressed with how Simmons has been developed in the second half of S2. It takes some courage to put such a sweet, adorable character on a dark path, but they had her change in a realistic way in response to what she's been through... just like people do in real life. They didn't play it safe by having her stay the same character that viewers love through all the crap. AoS is big on character development and growth, and that's one of the biggest strengths in a show that could've easily just been cool Marvel mythology with action scenes and colorrful costumes.

    ReplyDelete
  98. I also really enjoyed how the FitzMack friendship blossomed out of that situation. A wall had appeared between Fitz and his existing friends/teammates because they were all walking on eggshells around him seeing him as fragile and vulnerable and not knowing how to handle it. And then you had Mack, who was A) direct and honest instead of treating Fitz any differently because of his disability, and B) unfamiliar with the "old" Fitz, so he wasn't expecting anything from him, he just accepted and liked him as he was. That's another example of good character writing, and having a solid foundation for a friendship instead of it just randomly existing.

    ReplyDelete
  99. Well, a haircut is pretty minor thing to me so adjusting to it shouldn't be a big deal: after a few episodes of seeing Chloe with shorter hair, we're bound to get used to it. A name change is much more important, but I don't think we're just going to start S3 with everyone calling Skye "Daisy" and treating it like the most natural thing in the world. It's a change that needs to be addressed and explained on-screen, and I imagine it will be. If not, I too will feel cheated.

    ReplyDelete
  100. The song remains the same: if a character isn't written the way KG thinks they should be, they've gotten "screwed over". Zero open-mindedness about the changes. What else is new?

    ReplyDelete
  101. Also, I'm sure all of those people who agree with KG about how bad the S2 finale was and S3 sounds can come here and make their own case. Simply citing their existence doesn't add anything to the discussion or make her argument any more credible.

    ReplyDelete
  102. As I've said before, even if it's not justified, even if Cal is actually ten times worse than Ward (not at all what I believe but whatever) - Skye has a need to forgive Cal. Believing she's the biological daughter of TWO monsters would be a terrible thing and make it hard to live with herself. Since Jiaying went as far as to try to murder her own child, it's only natural that Skye would cling on to whatever goodness she had found in her other parent. Cal may or may not deserve forgiveness, but Skye deserves the peace of mind she's able to glean from forgiving him, and that's good enough.

    ReplyDelete
  103. Yeah, heh. It's not easy to be an actor.


    I promise I won't accuse the show of screwing Hunter's character if he stays clean-shaven. However, if he cuts himself shaving and someone says "You should start being careful with a razor, dude", I reserve the right to complain about victim blaming.

    ReplyDelete
  104. sunnygreendale22 July 2015 at 15:16

    All of the characters had amazing development this season. It's not just that they let their characters change, but they let them change naturally and believably. When Simmons first started showing problems with powered people I immediately rolled my eyes and leapt to the conclusion that she was going to become, maybe not evil, but annoyingly antagonistic towards Skye, which didn't make any sense for her character. I, like many others, thought this because that sort of thing has been done over and over on tv; writers want to put a wedge between characters but they typically find a flimsy excuse and milk it for all its worth. Imagine my surprise, an relief, when Simmons was nothing but supportive towards Skye. Yes she made an insensitive comment or two about her powers, but she never thought anything less of Skye herself. Simmons changed, but she didn't stop being Simmons. Just like Fitz didn't stop being Fitz or Skye didn't stop being Skye.


    I remember a scene, I think it was the mid-season finale, where Skye briefly breaks through her new badass, May-influenced persona to give Coulson a hug. It was a simple gesture, but it helped show that, while the writers may have changed Skye drastically, possibly because of some negative feedback from fans, they never retconned the character. And I think Chloe Bennet and the rest of the cast deserve props for maintaining that consistency even as these characters change. Which brings it back to why I'm not sweating the name/hair change.

    ReplyDelete
  105. The fact that they show how these major events effect the characters is what I like about AOS in the MCU in general. Has anyone else done superheroes with PTSD before? Too many times they never show the after effects but they do here and I respect them for that.


    Speaking of representation of persons with disabilities in the MCU, this is the second time that the director of SHIELD has been non-traditionally able. Considering how little representation there is a persons with disabilities on television this is great.

    ReplyDelete
  106. Considering in SHIELD #7 they made Daisy Johnson more like her TV counterpart, I don't think we have a lot to worry about. Also she had longer hair than in the picture below, about three or 4 inches. I'm inclined to believe that's the look that TV Skye/Daisy will have.

    ReplyDelete
  107. If it's important they can always use fake facial hair. But these are spies trying to stay off the radar, so new looks are par for the course.

    ReplyDelete
  108. There are just some people who make you realize why the root word for fan is fanatic. It's terrifying when people get like that.

    ReplyDelete
  109. There is this part of me that hopes Colson's new hand has a rocket launcher or is strong enough to crush Loki's larynx.

    ReplyDelete
  110. sunnygreendale22 July 2015 at 15:36

    There is going to be a time jump, so I think the majority of that transition will take place largely off screen unfortunately. I think it will be addressed; maybe another character slips and calls her Skye, or maybe Skye becomes a nickname that just a few people like Coulson use. After all the uproar, I think the writers will have to do something to appease the fans, myself included because I too want some explanation, but I don't think the name will be nearly as important as Daisy's role as an inhuman and now, not only a shield agent, but the leader of a team of powered people. Questions about identity have always been an important part of Skye/Daisy's journey, but her name is just one aspect of that. While I would like them to address the name, the fact that the writers and Chloe have an explanation is enough for me, whether or not they voice it on screen.

    ReplyDelete
  111. Actually, they made some changes in the comic books recently. Comics Daisy is now of in human ancestry and they made her mom look exactly like her TV mom. I wouldn't be surprised at all if her one-shot in September we find out that Daisy is now of Chinese ancestry. Essentially they are taking parts of what they like from the TV version and passing it back to the comics version of the character. They also gave comics Daisy the nickname Skye and made her hair is longer in the new version. It isstill short but not that short. Basically the changes are going in both directions.

    ReplyDelete
  112. sunnygreendale22 July 2015 at 15:57

    It's the internet after all. You can find support for nearly any opinion about anything if you look hard enough. But when it comes to opinions, the quality of the argument is more important than the quantity of people who believe it. At least it should be anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  113. Holy crap, that's some fast growth, I'd still be a stuble stage if I'd gone that clean shaven.

    ReplyDelete
  114. I see what you did there.

    ReplyDelete
  115. For those of us that aren'that fanatical and for them I would guess.

    ReplyDelete
  116. Hunter can practically join the Secret Warriors with facial hair that grows so fast... although I'm not sure this kind of power would do much good against the bad guys.

    ReplyDelete
  117. The ability to change your appearance to avoid capture.
    Okay we need to start a list of really strange superpowers.

    ReplyDelete
  118. I wonder if that's why they decided the character would have facial hair. I do remember from the comic con interview that he arrived on the set via the redeye and didn't even have time to take a shower before he started filming.

    ReplyDelete
  119. If Hunter can grow his facial hair *this* fast, maybe it can become spikes to stab his enemies with. Not too bad, if a bit of a Raina rip-off.

    ReplyDelete
  120. Cool, I bet Mike can give him some tips on how to use those functions.

    ReplyDelete
  121. Exactly, the characters have changed a lot but they're still themselves. Which gives me faith that Skye won't become an entirely different person even with the current transition into the Daisy persona.

    ReplyDelete
  122. Omgggg can't wait for this season. Their going to cast new people for the secret warriors right. Haven't heard much news recently.

    ReplyDelete
  123. Depending on how Jemma's situation develops this might be the way to address it with the gap. ie if Jemma is missing for the duration of the "gap" and then returns to have everyone else calling Skye Daisy, I could see them using that to explain why Daisy chose to change her name.

    That covers the change and the gap, if that's how Jemma's rock issue is addressed.

    ReplyDelete
  124. As I said above if Jemma is absent for the gap in the rock, then they could use her return and confusion over the name change to address the change.

    ReplyDelete
  125. sunnygreendale22 July 2015 at 19:44

    That is also a possibility, assuming she is absent for that long. I have a feeling that Simmons, or something resembling Simmons, got out of that rock before anyone noticed she was missing. Personally, I'm rooting for the Agent Venom theory that's been floating around.

    ReplyDelete
  126. I've actually been wondering myself who are going to be part of the AoS version of Secret Warriors. Lincoln is a shoe-in, given both the fact that he realized the truth about Jiaying in the end of S2 (thus being more inclined to work with SHIELD) and Luke joining the main cast. Two other possible members are Mike, if he comes back, and Alisha (the Inhuman who could clobe herself - Lincoln pointed out that she, like others, was misled into helping Jiaying, so it's not unthinkable that she would be willing to follow in Lincoln's footsteps).

    But right now, the only superpowered characters in the main cast are Skye and Lincoln, so it's hard to tell who's going to be on the team other than them.

    ReplyDelete
  127. It would be fairly easy for the show to have Alisha as she's Adrienne's stunt double from memory, though the fx costs might be an issue.

    I do wonder how large the team could be given the size of the cast already, though I presume "Lash" will also support along with random new Inhumans.

    ReplyDelete
  128. Exactly considering all they have been through already suggesting that they would still be the untouched happy 1.01 people...

    The growth of the characters has been logically if you will and well developed.

    ReplyDelete
  129. So very true, they all have developed, even May has changed from the detached May of Season 1.

    ReplyDelete
  130. And when you consider while Fury's is a cannon disability that had to be included, there was nothing that forced them to cut off Coulson's hand. That and the well developed female characters (on all sides) is another plus.

    ReplyDelete
  131. I doubt the cloning girl will return I barely remember her. I want some new people from the comic to appear.

    ReplyDelete
  132. It is nice to have a female villain who is evil in her own right and not just evil because she's trying to seduce the protagonists.

    ReplyDelete
  133. Considering everything these characters have gone through in the last two years, I would be deeply disturbed if they were exactly who they were her in episode one.

    ReplyDelete
  134. I probably didn't understand you correctly, you mean Lash supporting the Secret Warriors team? That seems unlikely, isn't he almost certain to be a villain?

    ReplyDelete
  135. sunnygreendale22 July 2015 at 21:12

    There's also Donnie Gill, if they can fish him out of the ocean, and though it might be a stretch, they could get Absorbing Man, seeing as he was more of a gun for hire than an outright villain and could possibly be convinced to work for shield in exchange for his freedom. However, I think both are more likely to join Ward's team. Also, there's a good chance Simmons might get superpowers from the Kree stone, so you never know. I think we'll only get one or two completely new characters on the team this season, three at most. As has been mentioned, this already large cast can only hand a few new faces.

    ReplyDelete
  136. Well, considering Donnie was shot and nearly killed by SHIELD (by Skye herself actually, though I assume he's unaware of that), I think he's almost as unlikely as join a SHIELD-related outfit as Absorbing Man is. Moreover, there's always the question of whether they won't prefer to stick to comic canon, in which Blizzard is a villain and member of the Masters of Evil. It actually makes me wonder if we won't eventually see a supervillain team (a real one, not the joke Cal had going) rise to challenge the Secret Warriors. Between Blizzard, Absorbing Man, Graviton and probably a couple I'm forgetting, there are enough loose ends they could tie up in a cool way if they do this.

    Anyway, I agree that given how big the cast has gotten, I don't imagine there will be too many new faces next season. I just wonder how it's going to work, because right now there aren't enough superpowered characters for this concept.

    ReplyDelete
  137. That could be, but I also thought we'd see more of the process of Coulson rebuilding SHIELD this time last year, yet it seemed to already be up and running when the show returned.

    ReplyDelete
  138. Sorry I meant Lash should have some supporting Inhuman villians as well surely, I doubt he'd just be on his own.

    ReplyDelete
  139. It would certainly come under the heading of Bad writing if that was the case (also would make no sense)

    ReplyDelete
  140. Very true, there was nothing sexual about her actions, twisted and evil in the end but yeah it was good writing IMO

    ReplyDelete
  141. It's possible we'll be seeing a proto-Secret Warriors team from the get go, but it likely won't be the definite one and wouldn't surprise me if a few of those proto-members get offed in order to emphasize Lash's threat. They did do something similar in last season's premiere, after all.

    ReplyDelete
  142. Don't see Alisha being developed into a real character anytime soon, being such a last minute addition to the previous season and played by a stuntswoman rather than a full-time actress to boot. The only reason she even exists was to increase the number of Inhuman enemies SHIELD would have to face in the finale, any new appearance of her would likely be to give her a proper sendoff IMO.

    ReplyDelete
  143. Does make one wonder how can they form a proper Secret Warriors team with a cast this big and almost completely human, doesn't it? Are they going to start handling powers to anyone on the regular cast just so they won't have to include too many guests? o_O

    ReplyDelete
  144. I can literally hear the voices in my head:

    "...c'mon Skye, hurry up"
    "Stop it, call me Quake in the field"
    "What, why?"
    "Because it sounds way cooler."
    "...ehh, copy that, Agent Quake."
    Coulson turns off his coms turns to Fitz: "That does sound cooler"
    "Way cooler, ya."

    ReplyDelete
  145. In other news, Clark Gregg apparently published the premiere's cover page on Instagram only to take it down after a short while. Fortunately for us someone saved it and put it on imgur. :)


    http://i.imgur.com/NGoCwPT.png

    ReplyDelete
  146. Ragtag is the season's codename, mind you, the episode name itself is covered in black; I *think* someone on Reddit managed to read "Laws of Nature" out of it. "Written by" is pretty obviously Jed Whedon and Maurissa Tancharoen, they've written last season's premiere and finale so it makes sense they'd do it again on the new one. No idea about the director, and don't feel like researching those who do the job on the show to throw a guess.

    ReplyDelete
  147. Stephen S. Bowman23 July 2015 at 11:08

    i was more referring to daisy johnson name not the MCU

    ReplyDelete
  148. Kevin Feige recently said this about a possible Ant-Man connection, but it fits here too.

    “People can read into it, We’ll see what it is. We shot that way before [the ‘SHIELD’ finale]. But, honestly, somehow that is how connections happen. Something that they don’t seem connected and someone goes, ‘Hey, you know what? We could connect these things.'”

    ReplyDelete
  149. Actually, Alisha's FX could possibly be some of the cheapest to use. They don't have to show her copy herself every time, just like they didn't show Gordon's teleport every time.
    Lincoln and Daisy almost have to have some sort of FX shown every time they use their powers.

    ReplyDelete
  150. I don't think she would look good with the "Angelina Jolie's hacker" look either but looks like is a adaptation and its longer. I don't think changing her hair was that important since a lot of comicbook adaptation don't follow exactly the comic looks.

    ReplyDelete
  151. Good point there alright, now that you've said it, their powers are more FX intensive by a wide margin. The waiting to see is going to kill me...

    ReplyDelete
  152. Right. Well, it's a definite possibility, I don't imagine Lash is the only one with the radical view that New Inhumans should be "judged", and eliminated if they aren't found worthy. Sadly, our history has taught us that an alarmingly large number of people can be sold on the idea of purity of race.

    A few folks who are comic readers have described Lash as similar to Ronan the Accuser. I'm really curious to see what his character will be like.

    ReplyDelete
  153. It's funny - per Misscar, the comic book version of Daisy is changing to better resemble the AoS version, too, including her hair now being slightly longer. With Chloe, on balance, cutting her hair, I guess they'll meet halfway in terms of hair length. LOL.

    ReplyDelete
  154. I can't wait to see what they decide to find the common ground. I'm surprised with them back filming that something hasn't leaked out yet.

    ReplyDelete
  155. Well, they've only been filming for a couple of days, right? Hopefully, the goods will start coming soon. I also hope ABC gets its shit together and doesn't wait until a week before the season premiere to start promoting the show's return, like last year. With the state of the ratings, they can't afford to slack off.

    ReplyDelete
  156. Very true on all accounts (honestly ABC's promotion of the show has always been fairly sh!te in my view). I'm just thinking that with the amount of attention the hair thing has generated that they might as well get a photo out on it...

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.