Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Review of Elementary Episode 2.20 "No End of Void": "Milk It"


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Review of Elementary Episode 2.20 "No End of Void": "Milk It"

12 Apr 2014

Share on Reddit



 After some recent episodes involving bizarre gimmicks--ears grown to create false evidence, dentures being used by a murderous mother attempting to cast doubt on her son's guilt, and so on--Elementary offers with "No End of Void" an episode that merely invokes the shadow of terrorism in a plot about the manufacture of vast amounts of anthrax for nefarious purposes. The plot begins when Watson (Lucy Liu) is asked to attend a patient in police custody. When he dies of anthrax, the hunt is on for the source of the disease.

The victim ended up with the disease because he picked an ex-con's pocket, as video surveillance reveals, an ex-con with connections to other criminals with radical leanings. When the ex-con is tracked to his home, we are treated to an excellent example of how Holmes (Johnny Lee Miller) and Watson have complementary working styles. While Holmes calculates time lines, average walking rates and pace lengths to establish a search perimeter, Watson checks the guy's mail and finds he has a storage locker nearby. Holmes's over-intellectualizing is complemented by Watson's more pragmatic approach. However, since the ex-con is dead and his anthrax hoard gone, the hunt must continue.

The plot unfolds with several red herrings, notably an apparent terrorist plot to use the anthrax to  infect hundreds of government figures. Ultimately, however, things loop back to the brother of one of the apparent terrorists, Bart Macintosh (Garret Dillahunt), a struggling dairy farmer. The "guest star" rule applies here and impacted my ability to be surprised by the plot; the moment I recognized Dillahunt, I knew he would have to turn out to be more than a minor figure, so the revelation of his guilt came as no surprise: he has plotted to use the anthrax not to commit mass murder but instead to kill his cattle and collect a huge insurance payout. Such monetary motives seem to be getting all too frequent on Elementary, as several other recent episodes have ended up being about profit. Admittedly, profit is a popular motive for murder, but the show seems to be getting into something of a rut with the idea.


Macintosh's willingness to kill his brother as well, however, adds a bit more resonance to the episode, especially given its subplot. In the subplot, we learn that Holmes's old friend and mentor Allistair (Roger Rees) has died of a drug overdose--after three decades of sobriety, he has apparently lapsed. Holmes's distress--and his difficulty coping not only with the loss but also with with its being drug-related--is a through-line in the episode, manifesting itself in potentially dangerous ways (Holmes takes unnecessary risks tracking the anthrax, which would have got him killed had he not been after a red herring rather than the real thing) as well as in "dialogues with the dead," in which Allistair appears to Holmes and they chat. I confess this is a gimmick I rarely enjoy, but it works reaonably well here, notably due to Miller's strong performance, matched by Rees's touching Allistair. Also key here are Watson's attempts to get Holmes to face up to how the death has affected him--including matching him dish for dish in a crockery-smashing tantrum.

The relevance of this plot, I think, is that it contrasts--implicitly, anyway--different ways familial relationships can be destructive. Allistair is not, of course, Holmes's actual family, but we did first meet him when Holmes had Allistair pose as his father, and Allistair's mentor capacity for Holmes gives him a sort of surrogate father role for the detective. This contrasts with Allistair's fraught relationhship with his own son--indeed, Holmes initially suspects that Allistair's death may have had something to do with that strained family history: a son who could never come to terms with his father's leaving his mother and entering into a homosexual relationship. Holmes's own troubled relationships with father and brother come to mind here. We are further reminded of family connections when Watson disposes of expired milk on her mother's recommendation. Her mother fears it might be contaminated by anthrax, so family concern contrasts here with Macintosh family strife--and leads to Holmes solving the crime, when he leaps to the bovine conclusion while watching Watson dump milk.

All in all, this is a satisfying episode. As a bonus, it even works in reference to absurdist drama, as Allistair's lover gifts Holmes with a signed first edition of Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot, a play in which Allistair had an early career success, and another element of the epsisode that might comment obliquely on the show's themes, given the play's bleak view of human relationships. (Though technically, the book Holmes is given is not really the first edition of the play, as he's given an English edition, and the play was originally issued in French as En Attendant Godot.) How did you enjoy the episode? do you agree or disagree with my criticisms (keeping in mind that in Waiting for Godot, the worst insult one can apply to someone is "crrrrrritic!")?

11 comments:

  1. All in all, this is a fulfilling show .As a reward, it even performs in referrals to absurdist dilemma, as Allistair's fan presents Holmes with a finalized first version of Samuel Beckett's Awaiting Godot, a perform in which Allistair had an beginning profession achievements, and another factor of the epsisode that might opinion obliquely on the show's styles, given the play's gloomy perspective of romantic connections. (Though officially, the guide Holmes is given is not really the first version of the perform, as he's given an British version, and the perform was initially released in France as En Worker Godot.) How did you appreciate the episode? do you believe the fact or don't believe the fact with my criticisms (keeping in thoughts that in Awaiting Godot, the most severe offend one can implement to someone is "crrrrrritic!")?





    Spybubble

    ReplyDelete
  2. Someone needs to teach the author how to spell and use correct punctuation. There are SO many errors I stopped reading half way through.

    ReplyDelete
  3. actually the book seen in the show is a first edition, it is the First English Language Edition and specifically the Grove Press, New York, 1954 edition, maybe to a bit more research, and some grammar check, as editions can have more then one first. by the way this edition, in the right condition, is worth well over 2 grand.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Apologies. fixed--I hope.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Um, yeah, I know that. I said it was a first edition, not the first edition, myself. Ian called it "the" first edition in the episode.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Fabulous review! One of the things that struck me as very brave about the episode is that it never does provide ANY explanation of why Alastair relapsed. We aren't given any satisfying closure about it. In a way then, Holmes is waiting for his own Godot - that thing that could trigger his own relapse....

    ReplyDelete
  7. Someone might learn to be a bit less sarcastic.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks. Nicely put. I very much liked that element, too.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Virginia Fontana12 April 2014 at 20:20

    Nice review! I agree about the "Guest star rule" when one realizes the recognizable, ubiquitous character actor is most likely the culprit. I feel like this is pretty much always an issue with this and other shows of the genre. :)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thanks! Yes, it can be a distraction. I like it when a "name" guest star is included only to turn out not to be guilty of anything--as with last week's episode!

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.